Impact of the Fur Trade on Politics written by: Thea Franklin • edited by: Laurie Patsalides • updated: 1/5/2012 Learn about how the fur trade started, who got involved, what companies were created, and what kind of political issues arose (here's a hint: war!). Bet you never knew how crazy the history behind a fur coat was!
How It All Started In order to understand how the fur trade impacted political decisions of the time, you must first understand how fur trade even began. It started in the 1500's when a French explorer named Jacques Cartier landed in North America, near the Gulf of St. Lawrence. He began trading with the local Native Americans, who were willing to trade their small furs for European items they had never seen before. Eventually the French would begin to trade for one of the most famous furs: the beaver pelt, which was highly prized for its many uses. By the early 1600's, the French had created alliances with multiple Native American tribes, including the Algonquin, Montagnais, and the Huron. It was around this time that English traders landed in the area and became direct competition for the French. The power struggle between the two over the next century would get so out of control that it would eventually lead to war.
French and Indian War The French and Indian War was fought between 1754 and 1763 up and down the eastern North American coast, and would eventually be considered one of the many wars fought during the Seven Year's War (a European war fought over a variety of reasons). England and France already had problems with one another, and when France tried to expand their trading territory in North America farther south, the English fought back.
Most of the Native Americans believed that the French were less threatening than the English and chose to fight on their side. This gave the French an advantage in troop numbers and early on, they were winning. However, the English eventually decided to put all of their effort into the North American war, and were able to defeat enough of the French navy to cut off their supplies. The French were finally defeated just outside Quebec, and the English were able to take most of the French territories. The Treaty of Paris forced France to give up Canada and everything east of the Mississippi River to the English, as well as the Louisiana Territory to the Spanish, and was left with little else. From this point on, Great Britain was considered the greatest power.
Companies Fur trade was considered such a profitable venture that in addition to the French and the English, the Russians and eventually the American colonists would also try to get a hand into the profit. The companies were created to try to hold monopolies over certain areas of North America. Hudson's Bay The Hudson's Bay Company was the first trading company, founded by the English in 1670. It completely dominated the fur trade in North America until the creation of the North West Company in 1779. Even after the appearance of competitors, they were still able to maintain a fairly large amount of profit. When fur trading died out in the East and Midwest, Hudson's Bay merged with the North West Company and took control of fur trading in the West, dominating that area until it became too populated courtesy of wagon trains. Implications of illegal fur trading and bad publicity would lead to its eventual downfall and disbandment by the government. However, the company itself still exists to this day, though instead of trading, it runs retail stores. North West The North West Company ran from 1779 to 1821 until it was forced to merge with the Hudson's Bay Company. In the 1820's, the dying fur trade was causing hostilities between companies, and they believed it was in everyone's best interest to merge and stop the fighting. American Fur and Pacific Fur Both the American and Pacific Fur Companies were created by John Jacob Aster in 1808 and 1810, respectively. They dominated the American fur trade (not Canada) until they were run out of business by the Hudson's Bay Company in 1842. Russian-American The Russian-American Company was founded in 1799 and gave Russia trading rights down the west coast from what is now Alaska all the way to just north of San Francisco. When profit from fur trading began to decline in the 1820's, the company was taken over by the Russian government and would eventually be sold to a San Francisco company, though it closed for good in 1881.
So Where Are the Politics? In a word, everywhere! If you look to the political decisions made by England and France, they were completely driven by the fur trade at that time, because the fur trade had everything to do with land and territory expansion. When it came to the U.S., they made decisions based on keeping foreign traders out and controlling the trade with the Native Americans. Why? Because they knew from watching previous centuries, and the current market, that fur trading was profitable, and when does a country not want to make a profit? Even when the beaver trade dried up, traders simply moved on to other animals. However, not all the political decisions made were in the favor of the traders. Theodore Roosevelt is considered one of the greatest conservationist presidents in history. He is credited as being completely disgusted at the near eradication of the beavers and the continuing damage to other animals being trapped for fur. In addition to the numerous environmental reforms attributed to him, he is also responsible for pushing the conservation efforts and reforms for animals.
References Sources: Spielvogel, Jackson L. Western Civilization Vol. II: Since 1500. Thomson Wadsworth, 2006. Strong, Douglas H. Dreamers & Defenders: American Conservationists. University of Nebraska Press, 1988. Images: Benjamin West. "Noble Savage". http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Benjamin_west_Death_wolfe_noble_savage.jpg Napa. "Beaver Pelt". http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fur_trade_museum_beaver_pelt.jpg Pach Brothers. "Theodore Roosevelt".http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:President_Theodore_Roosevelt,_1904.jpg
The Fur Trade and Politics: How Did It Impact the Political Decisions of ...
Impact of the Fur Trade on Politics written by: Thea Franklin • edited by: Laurie Patsalides • updated: 1/5/2012 Learn about how the fur trade started...
Answers: Guest Teacher. A) The English competed with the French for furs. B) They had sent some of their best military commanders to the colonies. C) British expansion caused the Indians to revolt. Other issues: How do I interpret a forensic DNA repo
Jul 24, 2013 - Get answers to your History & Social Studies questions like How did the fur trade contribute to the French and Indian War? from BookRags.com.
Fur Trade Contributed to the French and Indian war because the English competed with the French for furs.
Dec 29, 2012 - The fur trade, more than any other activity, contributed to the white exploration and opening of the wilderness north of Mexico, and it led to extensive contacts between whites and Indians. All the colonial powers were involved in the
The French and Indian War did not curtail the fur trade for long, and soon HBC personnel moved into the interior. Independent tradersâ Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and Bostoniansâbegan frequenting Lake Winnipeg and the Saskatchewan River, fol
An aggressive policy on the part of the French after 1663 led to extension of trade to lake Michigan and lake Superior through Indian middlemen such as the Ottawa, ... following reorganization of the Hudson's Bay Company on Hudson bay after 1713, con
Oct 6, 2017 - Fur Trade Area Hudson Bay Blankets Alexander Mackenzie. Early North America history centers around the animal skin trade and American Western Expansion. North of present day Mexico, the vast territory of the United States and Canada was
North West Company Fur Post page 1 of 8. People of the Fur Trade: On the backs of men, in the hands of women. Working the trade. The North West Company operated in a complex system of managers, assistants and contract workers. At the top level were t
The first was an independent band of blood relatives or unrelated people who contributed an equal share of the hunting expedition expenses; the second was a band ..... In the case of the fur trade, this meant that the French were forced to learn from
Sep 19, 2016 - All permanent residents of New France were permitted to trade for furs with Indigenous people, but they had to sell the beaver and moose hides to the ... of men into the beaver trade, and to reduce the glut of pelts) was given while En
Fur Trade. In the early 17th century, French traders began to use Huron (or Wyandot) middlemen to trade with the Native peoples in the Great Lakes region. ... In the mid-18th century, Native peoples were living peacefully in a multiethnic region wher
Frank Biocca. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lau, Richard R. 1986. "Political Schemata, Candidate Evaluations and Voting Behavior." In Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, ... Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and T
Grade 4: Unit 6. Student Look-Fors. 1. Students complete the graphic organizer with accurate information. A sample completed graphic organizer is included below: 14th Amendment (1866). Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Su
[and] the political parties shall ensure a balanced and fair representation of women and men at all decision-making levels. (2) All parliamentary and governmental commissions and committees shall ensure equitable and paritarian representation of wome
Native women were the primary female participants in the fur trade. Plains Indian women married French Canadian, British, American, and Indian employees of the fur companies. As wives and daughters, Native women acted in such important fur trade role
Aug 14, 2011 - The fur trade in the seventeenth century was globalized: that is, furs obtained from the Indians in North America were transported to Europe where they were sold for a profit. ... While the French viewed the war as a failure as it did
The Ojibwe were particularly influential, which led many French and British people to favor Ojibwe customs of bartering, cooperative diplomacy, meeting in councils, and the use of pipes. Following the American Revolution, the US competed fiercely wit
Jun 23, 2008 - In this paper I investigate the nature of cynicism in Dutch politics. Borrowing the notions of cynicism and kynicism from Sloterdijk (1984/20056) we can identify as kynics the cynical citizens that remain hopeful, and as cynics, the cy
Kompas (2008), Percepat Protokol Manajemen Krisis (Accelerating Crisis. Management Protocols), April 28. McLeod, R. (2008), Survey of Recent Developments, in: Bulletin of Indonesian. Economic Studies, 44, 2, 183-208. Patunru, A. and C. von Luebke (20
Jan 18, 2018 - Purnama to be arrested for humiliating Islam.8 Iqbal had also been critical of Purnama's policy on wages, criticising the fact that wages in ... 7 https://www.koranperdjoeangan.com/sinetron-hukum-gubernur-ahok/; .... 2012 at https://ma