HI5029 IS Project Management T3 2024 Assessment Help

HI5029 IS Project Management T3 2024 Assessment Help

HI5029 IS Project Management T3 2024 Individual Assignment Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T3 2024 Unit Code HI5029Unit Title IS Project ManagementAssessment Type Individual Assignment Due Date + time: 14/Feb/2025 11.59 pm (Melb / Sydney time)

Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) 1.Interpret and critique a variety of project management methodologies including both traditional and agile approaches; 2. Interpret user requirements and project management related data and make appropriate recommendations within a project context; 3. Analyse and evaluate the role of the modern project manager including ethical, social and cultural issues in the context of IT projects;Weight 40 % Total Marks Assignment (40 marks) Word limit 2500 words Submission Guidelines 

All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.



The assignment must be in MS Word format unless otherwise specified.

Academic Integrity Information Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.Penalties



All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time, along with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.



Your answers must be based on Holmes Institute syllabus of this unit. Outside sources may not amount to more than 10% of any answer and must be correctly referenced in full. Over-reliance on outside sources will be penalised



Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and referencing.

Individual Assignment Guidelines and Specifications

Individual Assignment Description In the dynamic landscape of project management, the integration of Agile methodologies with traditional project management approaches has emerged as a strategic imperative for organizations seeking to balance flexibility and structure. This synergy, often referred to as hybrid project management, strives to harness the strengths of both Agile and traditional methodologies. As organizations embark on this integrative journey, it becomes crucial to identify best practices that harmonize the iterative, adaptive nature of Agile with the comprehensive planning and control mechanisms inherent in traditional approaches. This exploration also necessitates a keen focus

on addressing potential conflicts that may arise when attempting to reconcile these seemingly disparate methodologies. As a project management consultant for anew company development company, you have been requested to produce a literature review report, which examines the integration of Agile methodologies with traditional project management approaches, identifying best practices for hybrid project management and addressing potential conflicts. For a thorough examination, perform a literature review concentrating on this specific research domain. Following this, create an analytical report investigating into the comparison of traditional and Agile methodologies. Explore how the strengths of traditional methodologies can be strategically incorporated into hybrid project management and suggest strategies to mitigate conflicts that may arise in the process. Your task involves conducting a literature search to identify at least ten (10) academic research papers relevant to this research area. Following this, you are expected to perform a critical analysis of the chosen references, offering a comprehensive discussion on how they contribute to the understanding of the topic. This assessment constitutes a substantial 40% of the unit’s grade, signifying its importance. It is recommended to initiate work on this assignment early in the semester, steadily progressing to develop a high-quality literature review by the semester’s conclusion. The deliverable for this assessment:

DeliverableWeightWeek DueFinal Submission40%Week 12 Deliverable Description You need to submit the final version of your assignment in Week 13. The structure of the final report consists of 5 sections as follows: 

Introduction

State the purpose and objectives of the report. 

Literature Review

Document a review of literature on Agile/SCRUM project scope management. 

Discussion

Discuss the references, and critically analyse them and discuss how they reflect the topic. You need to discuss the methods employed in handling scope changes within SCRUM projects, explore the challenges associated with them, and outline the effective scope management strategies to maintain control over project scope. 

Conclusion

Summarize your findings by emphasizing the key points of the report. 

References

Provide the list of references following the Adapted Harvard Referencing style. Your literature review should present the current state of knowledge in the specific area of the topic, and it should have a narrative that flows smoothly from one paragraph to the next. Additionally, the final submission should consist of no fewer than 2,500 words. Marking Rubric CriteriaFailPassCreditDistinctionHigh Distinction Presentation (4 marks) Poor presentation.Professional presentation and well written.Professional presentation with good writing skills.Professional presentation with very good writing skills.Professional presentation with excellent writing skills. Introduction

(4 marks) Vague introduction. Objectives are not clear.Acceptable brief introduction.Good introduction to the research area and objectives of the paper has been clearly outlined.Very good introduction to the research area and objectives of the paper has been clearly outlined. Good arguments built with quality references.An excellent thorough introduction to the research area and objectives of the paper has been clearly outlined. Excellent arguments built with quality references. Literature Review (15 marks) Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately.Some level of critical analysis done and sourced some reference material appropriately.Demonstrate ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately.Demonstrated very good ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately.Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately. Discussion (10 marks)

Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately.Some level of critical analysis done and sourced some reference material appropriately.Demonstrate ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately.Demonstrated very good ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately.Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately. Conclusion (4 marks) Argument is confused and disjointed.Mostly consistent logical and convincing.Logic acceptable follow with suitable arguments.The logic is very clear and easy to follow with strong arguments.Excellent logical sequence and commendable conclusions. Referencing (3 marks) Lacks consistency with many errors.Generally good referencing style.Clear styles with excellent source of references.Very good sources of references. Correct format followed.Excellent sources of references. The correct format followed.

Student Assessment Citation and Referencing Rules Adapted Harvard Referencing Rules Holmes Blackboard has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply: 1. Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources that provide full-text access to the source’s content for lecturers and markers. 2. The reference list must be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled: “References”. 3. The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z alphabetically by author surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source. For example: 1. Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. & Stein, A. 2004. Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf 1. All assignments must include in-text citations to the listed references. These must include the surname of the author/s or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page number of the content, and paragraph where the content can be found. For

example, “The company decided to implement an enterprise-wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies (Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4)).”

Non-Adherence to Referencing Rules Where students do not follow the above rules: 1. For students who submit assignments that do not comply with the rules, a 10% penalty will be applied. 2. As per the Student Handbook, late penalties will apply each day after the student/s has been notified of the due date. 3. Students who comply with rules and the citations are “fake” may be reported for academic misconduct. Submission Guidelines Your document should be a single MS Word or OpenOffice document containing your report. Do not use PDF as a submission format.

All submissions will be submitted through the safeAssign facility in Blackboard. Submission boxes linked to SafeAssign will be set up in the Units Blackboard Shell. Assignments not submitted through these submission links will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above) and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be penalized per day late (including weekend days) according to Holmes Institute policies. The SafeAssign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of plagiarism. SafeAssign will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class members submissions for plagiarism. You can see your SafeAssign similarity score (or match) when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your assignment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your assignment will be graded as late. Submitted assignments that indicate a high level of plagiarism will be penalized according to the Holmes Academic Misconduct policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of the resubmission feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please

remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission.