Audit Report Certification Audit for PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and Its Supply Bases FMS40006 RSPO Membership number: 1-0022-06-000-00 Audited Address: Peranap Mill: Simelinyang, Pauh Ranap, Sengkilo Village, Peranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia Its supply base: Simelinyang, Pauh Ranap, Sengkilo Village, Peranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia
Date of audit: 23/01/2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
SAI Global Indonesia
Page 1 of 118
Audit Report
Table of contents Executive Overview Abbreviations Used 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3
1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 2.0 2.1 2.2
2.3 2.4 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3
3.4 3.5 3.6 List of Tables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 4 5
SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT Introduction Audit Objective Scope of Certification 1.3.1 Palm Oil Mill 1.3.2 Oil Palm Estate Location of Mill and Estates Description of Supply Base Date of Plantings Area of Plantations Approximate Tonnages Offered for Certification (CPO and PK) Other Certificates Held Organisational Information/Contact Person Time Bound Plan for Other Management Units Partial Certification Requirements Date of Issue of Certificate
6 6 6 7 7 7 7 9 9 10 10 12 12 13 16 16
AUDIT PROCESS Certification Body Audit Methodology 2.2.1 Pre-audit 2.2.2 Certification audit Qualification of the Lead Auditor and Audit Team Members Stakeholder Consultation Date of Next Surveillance Visit
16 17 17 17 17 18 20
AUDIT FINDINGS Action taken on previous audit issues Claim and use of certification mark and or logo Description of audit findings 3.3.1 RSPO Principle and Criteria, Indonesian National Interpretation 3.3.2 Mill Supply Chain Requirements 3.3.2.1 Supply Chain Certification Standard 3.3.2.2 Supply Chain Certification System Recommendation Environmental and social risk for this scope of certification for planning of the surveillance audit Acknowledgement of Internal Responsibility and Formal Sign-off of Assessment Findings Mill and Estates GPS Locations FFB Production of the supply base Peranap Estate Age Profiles of Planted Palms Land use description of Peranap Estate in 2013 Estates and Area Planted 2013 Peranap Estate FFB Production Trend 2011 – 2013 Peranap Mill Total CPO and PK Production of 2013 and Estimate Production of 2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
20 20 21 21 93 94 99 100 100 100 Page 7 9 9 10 10 10 11
Page 2 of 118
Audit Report
List of Tables 8 9 10 11 12
Page Actual Peranap Mill Production of CPO and PK 2013 Estimated Peranap Mill Production of CPO and PK 2014 Certificates Held by Mill and Estates RSPO Certification Time Bound Plan List of internal and external stakeholder
11 12 12 13 20
List of Figures 1 Map of Mill and Estates Location
Page 8
List of Appendixes A Audit Plan B Nonconformities, Corrective Actions and Observations Summary C Stakeholder’s issues and comment D Definition of, and action required with respect to audit findings
Page 94 104 116 117
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 3 of 118
Audit Report
Executive Overview This is initial certification audit. SAI Global has audited Peranap Mill, PT. Rigunas Agri Utama and its supply bases operations that comprising one mill, one oil palm estate, support services and infrastructure. Initially Major Nonconformities were identified during this certification audit. Follow up audit has been conducted to review the corrective action taken to the Major Nonconformities, and objective evidences reviewed that Major Nonconformities could be closed out. At the conclusion of this audit, Peranap Mill, PT. Rigunas Agri Utama and its supply bases operation was found complies with the requirements of the National Interpretation of RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production, Republic of Indonesia, May 2008 and the RSPO Supply Chain Certification System, November 2011 and RSPO Supply Chain Certification Standard, Module E – CPO Mill: Module E Mass Balance November 2011. The recommendation from this audit is that certificate can proceed for PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill as a producer of RSPO Certified Sustainable Palm Oil and Palm Kernel Mass Balance Model. Estimated tonnage of certified CPO produced Estimated tonnage of certified PK produced
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
22,917 MT 5,482 MT
Page 4 of 118
Audit Report
Abbreviations Used AMDAL BOD BPN CPO CSR EFB FFB FRF GPS HCV HGU HPH IPM ISO ISPO KHT KLP KPN kWH LCC LUK LUP MB MSDS NGO OHS P2K3 PEL PHL POM PPE PPN PK PKB PKOF PT RAU RABQSA RKL RPL RSPO SA SCCS SIA SP SPSI TLV TPH TRAKSI WWTP
Environmental Impact Analysis (Analisis Dampak Lingkungan) Biological Oxygen Demand National Land Agency (Badan Pertanahan Nasional) Crude Palm Oil Corporate Social Responsibility Empty Fruit Bunch Fresh Fruit Bunch Fractionation and Refinery Factory Global Positioning System High Conservation Value Land Use Title (Hak Guna Usaha) Forest Authority Concession (Hak Penguasaan Hutan) Integrated Pest Management International Standards Organisation Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil Permanent worker (Karyawan Harian Tetap) Peranap smallholders (Kebun Plasma Peranap) Peranap Estate (Kebun Peranap) Kilo Watt Hour Legume cover crops Estate Unit Report (Laporan Unit Kebun) Mill Unit Report (Laporan Unit Pabrik) Mass Balance Material Safety Data Sheet Non-Government Organisation Occupational Health and Safety Safety Committee Environmental Evaluation Manual (Pedoman Evaluasi Lingkungan) Daily worker (Pekerja Harian Lepas) Palm Oil Mill Personal Protective Equipment Peranap Mill (Pabrik Peranap) Palm Kernel Joint Working Agreement (Perjanjian Kerja Bersama) Palm Kernel Oil Factory Rigunas Agri Utama Ltd. Quality Society of Australia Environmental Management Plan (Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan) Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan) Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Social Accountability Supply Chain Certification System Social Impact Assessment Indonesian Worker Union (Serikat Pekerja) Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia Threshold Limit Value Ton Per Hour Organization work unit who is responsible to provide heavy equipment, transportation equipment, and also maintaining road condition Waste Water Treatment Plant
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 5 of 118
Audit Report
1.0 1.1
SCOPE OF THE CERTIFICATION ASSESSMENT
Introduction
SAI Global conducted an audit of PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, Peranap Mill and Its Supply Bases on 21 to 23 January 2014 with Major Nonconformities identified. Follow up audit had been conducted on 17 and 23 March 2014 for verification of corrective action taken by the organisation. The purpose of this audit report is to summarise the degree of compliance with the relevant criteria, as defined on the cover page of this report, based on the evidence obtained during the audit of your organisation. SAI Global audits are carried out within the requirements of SAI Global procedures which also reflected the requirements and guidance provided in the international standards relating to audit practices such as ISO/IEC 17021, ISO 19011, RSPO Certification System, relevant RSPO Supply Chain Certification System and other normative criteria. SAI Global Auditors are assigned to audits according to industry, standard or technical competencies appropriate to the organisation being audited. Details of such experience and competency are maintained in our records. The audit team is detailed in the attached audit record. In addition to the information contained in this audit report, SAI Global maintains files for each client. These files contain details of organisation size and personnel as well as evidence collected during preliminary and subsequent audit activities (Documentation Review and Scope) relevant to the application for initial and continuing certification of your organisation. Details of your primary contact persons and their contact details and site addresses are also maintained. Please take care to advise us of any change that may affect the application/certification or may assist us to keep your contact information up to date, as required by SAI Global Terms and Conditions. Please note that this report is subject to independent review and approval. Should changes to the outcomes of this report be necessary as a result of the review, a revised report will be issued and will supersede this report.
1.2
Audit Objective
This is initial (certification) audit. The purpose of this audit was to determine compliance of your organization’s management system with the audit criteria (National Interpretation of RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production, Republic of Indonesia, May 2008 and the RSPO Supply Chain Certification System, November 2011 and RSPO Supply Chain Certification Standard, Module E – CPO Mill: Module E Mass Balance November 2011) and its effectiveness in achieving continual improvement and system objectives. It was also to verify the volume of certified and uncertified FFB entering the mill and volume sales of RSPO certified producers.
1.3
Scope of certification
The scope of certification is the CPO production from one (1) Palm Oil Mill and one (1) FFB supply base owned by PT. Rigunas Agri Utama.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 6 of 118
Audit Report
1.3.1 Palm Oil Mill Peranap Mill PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Location GPS Location Mill capacity
: Simelinyang, Pauh Ranap, Sengkilo Village, Peranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia : East 102001’10” South 0035’05” : 45 MT FFB/hour
1.3.2 Oil Palm Estate Peranap Estate PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Location
: Simelinyang, Pauh Ranap, Sengkilo Village, Peranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia
GPS Location
: East 101059’33” - 102004’23” South 0038’17” - 0033’51”
1.4
Location of mill and estates
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama mill and estate are located in Riau Province, Indonesia. The geographical coordinate of the mill and estates are shown on Table 1. Table 1: Mill and Estates GPS Locations included in certification assessment MILL AND ESTATE
EASTING 0
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
0
102 01’10” E
Peranap Mill Peranap Estate
SOUTHING
0
0
101 59’33” - 102 04’23” E
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
0 35’05” S 0
0
0 38’17” - 0 33’51” S
Page 7 of 118
Audit Report
Figure 1 Map of Mill and Estates Location
Source: Asian Agri Research and Development Centre Tebing Tinggi – Sumatera Utara
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 8 of 118
Audit Report
1.5
Description of supply base
The FFB source is one (1) organisation owned by PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, plasma estate managed by PT Rigunas Agri Utama and third party estates. Plasma estate and third party estate are excluded from certification. The plasma estate that supply FFB to Peranap mill is planned to be audited in 2016 based on time-bound plan. The third party (independent smallholders) sold FFB to the mill based on the agreed price and does not have special agreement with the organization. The hectarage and FFB production of the estates are shown on Table 2. Table 2. FFB Production of the supply base ESTATE
PLANTED AREA (HA)
FFB (TON/YEAR) (BUDGET 2014)
Peranap Estate, PT Rigunas Agri Utama
3,658
98,781
Sub Total
3,658
98,781
Peranap Smallholders Estate, PT Rigunas Agri Utama
5,142
100,252
N/A
50,000
8,800
249,033
rd
3 Party Total Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
1.6
Date of plantings Table 3: Peranap Estate Age Profiles of Planted Palms Estate Planted Area % of Planted Area (Ha) Year
Mature
Immature
Mature
Immature
1992
865
0
23.65
0
1993
1,315
0
35.95
0
1994
256
0
7.00
0
1995
575
0
15.72
0
1996
534
0
14.60
0
1997
113
0
3.09
0
Total
3,658
0
100.00
0
Grand Total
3,658
100.00
Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 9 of 118
Audit Report
1.7
Area of plantation
The areas details for organisation owned estates are shown on Table 5. Review of estate boundary maps has been done. There is no new open area since November 2005. All land in inside the concession area has been developed in period 1987 – 1989. The submitted estate boundary maps dated 23 June 2014 indicated that there are natural vegetated land has been cleared however the cleared area are within the enclave which is rubber plantation and it is open by the community who encroached to the company concession which the company do not have control. Table 4: Land use description of Peranap Estate in 2013 USED AREA
HECTARES
Mature plantation area
3,658
Immature plantation area
0
Total area planted
3,658
Emplacement and Mill
35
Other area (enclave, water ponds, land with slope >30 %)
1,522
Total leased area
5,215
HCV Area (included in planted area)
99
Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
Table 5: Estates and Area Planted 2013 ESTATE
MATURE (HA)
Peranap Estate
IMMATURE (HA) 3,658
0
Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
1.8
Approximate tonnages offered for certification (CPO and PK)
Approximate tonnages offered for certification is estimated based on the organisation last three years actual FFB production of Peranap Estate as well as last year CPO and PK, OER and KER of Peranap Mill. Table 6: Peranap Estate FFB Production Trend 2011 – 2013 YEAR
Actual Production (MT)
2011
98,304
2012
103,040
2013
97,301
Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 10 of 118
Audit Report
Table 7: Peranap Mill Total CPO and PK Production of 2013 and Estimate Production of 2014 FFB Processed (MT)
Supply Base
CPO Production (MT)
OER (%)
PK Production (MT)
KER (%)
Actual production 2013 Peranap Estate* Other Suppy Base Per anap Smallholders Estate, PT Rigunas Agri Utama and the
97,301
21,997
22.61
5,192
5.34
133,052
27,304
20.52
7,098
5.33
230.353
49.301
21.40
12.290
5.34
3rd Party Total actual production
Estimate production 2014 Peranap Estate
98,781
22,917
23.20
5,482
5.55
Other Suppy Base Per anap Smallholders Estate, PT Rigunas Agri Utama and the rd 3 Party
162,876
35,561
21.83
9,040
5.55
58,478
22.35
14,522
5.55
Total estimate production 261,657 Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014 *Detail see Table 8
The FFB from Peranap Estate are processed together with FFB from other supply based, therefore Peranap Mill used RSPO Supply Chain Mass Balance Model – Module E. Table 8: Actual Peranap Mill Production of CPO and PK 2013 Month
Total FFB (Ton)
Palm Oil (MT)
January 7,136 February 6,697 March 6,138 April 7,879 May 6,204 June 6,765 July 8,404 August 8,933 September 10,142 October 10,408 November 9,774 December 8,820 Total 97,301 Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
1,663 1,535 1,438 1,862 1,408 1,488 1,840 1,917 2,182 2,398 2,259 2,007 21,997
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
PK (MT) 401 385 336 419 339 361 424 430 487 569 538 503 5,192
Page 11 of 118
Audit Report
Table 9: Estimated Peranap Mill Production of CPO and PK 2014 Month
Total FFB (Ton)
Palm Oil (MT)
7,423 7,279 7,615 7,044 7,100 7,747 8,778 8,415 8,294 9,849 9,610 9,627
January February March April May June July August September October November December
PK (MT)
1,722 1,689 1,767 1,634 1,647 1,797 2,036 1,952 1,924 2,285 2,230 2,233
98,781 Total Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
412 404 423 391 394 430 487 467 460 547 533 534
22,917
5,482
Based on the above figures, the estimated of certified CPO and PK offered in 2014 for certification are: Estimated tonnage of certified CPO produced Estimated tonnage of certified PK produced
1.9
22,917 MT 5,482 MT
Other certificates held
The organisation is implementing ISCC standard based on the following certificate. Table 10: Certificates Held by Mill and Estates MILL/ESTATE Peranap Mill and Estate
OTHER CERTIFICATION HELD ISCC by SGS Germany, EU-ISCC-Cert-DE100-20130950, Period of 26 November 2013 – 25 November 2014
Source: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, January 2014
1.10
Organizational information/contact person
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Jl. MH. Thamrin No. 31, Jakarta 10230 Phone : (+62-21) 2301119 Fax : (+62-21) 2301120 Contact person : Ms. Asrini Subrata Stakeholder Relation Manager Email :
[email protected]
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 12 of 118
Audit Report
1.11
Time bound plan for other management units
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama as a subsidiary of PT. Inti Indosawit Subur is committed to RSPO certification of all its Management Units located in North Sumatera, Riau and Jambi Provinces. Time bound plan has been developed to achieve the RSPO certification for all its Management Units by 2018 and 2016 for Plasma. The time bound plan is realistic and challenging. The plan was detailed on Table 11. The time bound plan was revised in February 2014, because the previous version was not updated. Table 11: RSPO Certification Time Bound Plan
Name of Mill Buatan I Mill
Name of Supply Base Plantation
Mill Address Delik & Pangkalan Kerinci Village, Bunut Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau
Buatan Estate
Buatan (Plasma)
Buatan II Mill
Delik & Pangkalan Kerinci Village, Bunut Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau
Buatan Estate
Buatan (Plasma)
Ukui I Mill
Ukui Village, Ukui District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau
Ukui Estate
Ukui (Plasma)
Ukui II Mill
Ukui Village, Ukui District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau
Soga Estate
Ukui (Plasma)
Tungkal Ulu Mill
Pulau Pauh / Penyabungan / Merlung Village, Tungkal Ulu District, Tanjung Jabung Regency, Jambi
Tungkal Ulu Estate
Tungkal Ulu (Plasma)
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Estate Address
Time bound for certification
Delik & Pangkalan Kerinci Village, Bunut Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Delik & Pangkalan Kerinci Village, Bunut Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Delik & Pangkalan Kerinci Village, Bunut Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Delik & Pangkalan Kerinci Village, Bunut Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Ukui Village, Ukui District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Ukui & Lubuk Batu Jaya District, Pelalawan & Inhu Regency, Riau Ukui Village, Ukui District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Ukui & Lubuk Batu Jaya District, Pelalawan & Inhu Regency, Riau Pulau Pauh / Penyabungan / Merlung Village, Tungkal Ulu District, Tanjung Jabung Regency, Jambi Renah Mendalo, Merlung, Muara Papalik District, Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency, Jambi
2010
Certified on 16 September 2010
2010
Certified on 16 September 2010
2010
Certified on 1 March 2011
Brought forward from 2012 to 2011
Certified on 11 June 2012
2010
Certified on 1 March 2011
Brought forward from 2012 to 2011
Certified on 11 June 2012
2011
Certified on 15 August 2012
2012
Certified on 11 July 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Progress
Page 13 of 118
Audit Report
Name of Mill
Mill Address
Muara Bulian Mill
Singoan / Bukit Sari / Bulian Jaya Village, Muara Bulian / Pemayung District, Batang Hari Regency, Jambi
Name of Supply Base Plantation Muara Bulian Estate
Muara Bulian (Plasma) Muara Bulian (KKPA)
Topaz Mill
Petapahan Village, Tapung District, Kampar Regency, Riau
Topaz & Seed Garden Estate
Taman Raja Mill
Lubuk Bernai / Kampung Baru / Pelabuhan Dagang / Pematang Pauh Vilage, Tungkal Ulu District, Tanjung Jabung Regency, Jambi Langkan / Penarikan / Tambak / Sotol Village, Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau
Taman Raja & Badang Estate
Segati Mill
Segati Estate
Penarikan & Gondai Estate
Penarikan (KKPA)
Gunung Sahilan (KKPA)
Tanah Datar Mill
Tanah Datar Petatal Village, Talawi District, Asahan Regency, North Sumatera
Tanah Datar Estate
Bahilang Estate
Aek Nabara Mill
S1-S3 / Sukadame Village, Bilah Hulu / Kota Pinang
Aek Nabara Estate
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Estate Address
Time bound for certification
Singoan / Bukit Sari / Bulian Jaya Village, Muara Bulian / Pemayung District, Batang Hari Regency, Jambi Maro Sebo Ilir District, Batanghari Regency, Jambi Maro Sebo Ilir District, Batanghari Regency, Jambi Petapahan Village, Tapung District, Kampar Regency, Riau
2011
Certified on 28 August 2012
2012
Certified on 12 July 2013
2012
Certified on 12 July 2013
2013
Lubuk Bernai / Kampung Baru / Pelabuhan Dagang / Pematang Pauh Vilage, Tungkal Ulu District, Tanjung Jabung Regency, Jambi Langkan / Penarikan / Tambak / Sotol Village, Langgam District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Pangkalan Sarik / Baru Village, Langgam / Siak Hulu District, Pelalawan / Kampar Regency, Riau Pangkalan Sarik / Baru Village, Langgam / Siak Hulu District, Pelalawan / Kampar Regency, Riau Gunung Sahilan Village, Lipat Kain District, Pelalawan Regency, Riau Tanah Datar Petatal Village, Talawi District, Asahan Regency, North Sumatera Bahilang Village, Tebing Tinggi District, Serdang Bedagai Regency, North Sumatra S1-S3 / Sukadame Village, Bilah Hulu / Kota Pinang District,
2013
Public Notification conducted in December 2013. Main Audit in Jan 2014 Public Notification conducted in December 2013. Main Audit in Jan 2014
Progress
2014
-
2014
-
2014
-
2014
-
Brought Forward from 2015 to 2013
Public Notification conducted in December 2013. Main Audit in Feb 2014
Brought Forward from 2015 to 2013
Public Notification conducted in
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 14 of 118
Audit Report
Name of Mill
Name of Supply Base Plantation
Mill Address District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra
Estate Address
Time bound for certification
Teluk Panjie Mill
Teluk Panjie Village, Kampung Rakyat District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra
Teluk Panjie Estate
Teluk Panjie Village, Kampung Rakyat District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra
Brought Forward from 2015 to 2013
Peranap Mill
Simelinyang / Pauh Ranap / Sengkilo Village, Peranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau
Peranap Estate
Simelinyang / Pauh Ranap / Sengkilo Village, Peranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau
Brought Forward from 2016 to 2013
Peranap (Plasma)
Simelinyang / Pauh Ranap / Sengkilo Village, Peranap District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Tuo Sumai / Sungai Rambai Village, PWK Sumai / Tebo Ulu District, Bungo Tebo Regency, Jambi Tuo Sumai / Sungai Rambai Village, PWK Sumai / Tebo Ulu District, Bungo Tebo Regency, Jambi Kampung Padang Village, Bilah Hilir District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra Sennah Village, Bilah Hilir District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra Rahuning Village, Bandar Pulau District, Asahan Regency, North Sumatra
2016
December 2013. Main Audit in Feb 2014 Public Notification conducted in December 2013. Main Audit in Feb 2014 Public Notification conducted in December 2013. Main Audit in Jan 2014 -
2016
-
2016
-
2017
-
2017
-
2017
-
Gonting Mahala Village, Bandar Pulau District, Asahan Regency, North Sumatra Negri Lama Seberang Village, Bilah Hilir District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra Aek Korsik Village, Aek Natas District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North
2017
-
Brought Forward from 2018 to 2013
Public Notification conducted in December 2013. Main Audit in Feb 2014
Bungo Tebo Mill
Tanjung Selamat Mill
Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra
Progress
Tuo Sumai / Sungai Rambai Village, PWK Sumai / Tebo Ulu District, Bungo Tebo Regency, Jambi
Bungo Tebo Estate
Kampung Padang Village, Bilah Hilir District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra
Tanjung Selamat
Bungo Tebo (Plasma)
Pangkatan
Gunung Melayu I
Gunung Melayu II
Negri Lama I
Rahuning Village, Bandar Pulau District, Asahan Regency, North Sumatra Gonting Mahala Village, Bandar Pulau District, Asahan Regency, North Sumatra Negri Lama Seberang Village, Bilah Hilir District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra
Pulau Maria Estate
Sentral & Batu Anam Estate
Negri Lama
Aek Kuo
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 15 of 118
Audit Report
Name of Mill
Name of Supply Base Plantation
Mill Address
Estate Address
Time bound for certification
Progress
2018
-
Sumatra Negri Lama II
Negri Lama Seberang Village, Bilah Hilir District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra Source: Asian Agri, March 2013
1.12
rd
*3 party which is excluded from scope of certification
Negri Lama Seberang Village, Bilah Hilir District, Labuhan Batu Regency, North Sumatra
Partial Certification Requirements
The internal auditor organisation conducted the site visit and review regarding no replacement of primary forest or any area identified as containing High Conservation Values (HCVs) or required to maintain or enhance HCVs in accordance with RSPO criterion 7.3, land conflict, labour disputes and legal non-compliance to all management units which have not been certified to ensure that partial certification requirements were fulfilled. Site visits were conducted by the organisation for ensuring compliance against partial certification requirements according to RSPO Certification System clause 4.2.4: PT. Gunung Melayu: Gunung Melayu II Mill and their supply bases on 3 April 2013 PT. Saudara Sejati Luhur: Gunung Melayu I Mill and its supply base on 4 April 2013. PT. Rantau Sinar Karsa: Supply base for Tanjung Selamat Mill on 16 April 2013 PT. Indo Sepadan Jaya: Tanjung Selamat Mill and its supply base on 18 April 2013 PT. Rigunas Agri Utama: Bungo Tebo Mill and its supply base on 30 April 2013 PT. Mitra Unggul Pusaka: Segati Mill and its supply base on 8 June 2013 Based on the review it was concluded that: There was no new planting since January 2010 so there was no replacement of primary forest or any area identified as containing High Conservation Values (HCVs) or required to maintain or enhance HCVs in accordance with RSPO criterion 7.3. There were no land conflict and labour disputes There was no non-compliance with regulations based on internal gap analysis. Major non-conformances (NCR2014-01) rose from the audit since at the time the audit was conducted the evidence of compliance of all uncertified management units to partial certification requirements could not be shown. The NCR2014-01 was closed and the RSPO Internal Audit report has been revised accordingly and can be used for RSPO certification partial requirement. Also management has appointed SPO officer to ensure that all partial requirements to be included in the RSPO Internal Audit report (See Appendix B).
1.13
Date of issue of certificate
Date of issue of certificate will be the date on approval of this Assessment Report by the RSPO Secretariat.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 16 of 118
Audit Report
2.0 2.1
AUDIT PROCESS
Certification body
PT. SAI Global Indonesia Graha Iskandarsyah, 4th floor Jl. Iskandarsyah Raya No. 66 C Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta 12160, Indonesia Phone : +62 21 720 6186, 720 6460 Fax : +62 21 720 6207 Contact person : Ms. Inge Triwulandari Technical Manager Email :
[email protected] SAI Global is one of the world’s leading business providers of independent assurance. SAI Global provides organisations around the world with information services and solutions for managing risk, achieving compliance and driving business improvement. We provide aggregated access services to Standards, Handbooks, Legislative and Property publications; we audit, certify and register your product, system or supply chain; we facilitate good governance and awareness of compliance, ethics and policy issues and provide training and improvement solutions to help individuals and organisations succeed. The SAI Global business is driven by two equally important client needs - the mandated need for organisations to conform to regulations, standards and legislation in all their locations, and the operational need for organisations to improve business processes and procedures as well as corporate culture. As we are a global company, we can meet these needs for any client - those operating within one country's borders and in one language or those operating across borders and in several languages. There are three business units/divisions within SAI Global namely the Information Services Division, the Compliance Division, and the Assurance Division. The Assurance Division helps organisations manage risk, achieve process or product certification and drive improvement by providing training, registration audits and supplier management programs which can improve business performance. We provide independent audits, assessments and certification of your products or business processes to ensure they comply with industry standards or customer specific requirements. We understand how compliance with those standards can improve the efficiency, economy and profitability of your operation. With auditing and assessment staff located around the world, our clients include large global corporations as well as single site organisations. 2.2
Audit methodology
2.2.1 Pre-audit SAI Global planned the stage 2 certification audit based on review of the data given during stage 1 ISPO audit including: stakeholder, land title, etc. on 25th – 26th November 2013). SAI Global already communicated with RSPO Secretariat and ASI and it was confirmed that stage 1 is not mandatory under RSPO Certification System.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 17 of 118
Audit Report
2.2.2 Certification audit The Certification Audit was performed on 21st – 23rd January 2014 integrated with audit for ISPO, Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (Peraturan Menteri Pertanian #19/Permentan/OT.140/3/2011). The audit programme was included in the body of report. The audit methodology for collection of objective evidences were site inspection, documentation and record review and interview with staffs, workers, and other stakeholders. Objective evidences from documentation/record review in one area may also be cross checked with other objective evidences in other areas and with the evidence of implementation on site during the audit. Inputs from stakeholders via letter, email, or other communication media were also considered for this certification audit. Audit plan is available in Appendix A of this report on page 94. 2.3
Qualification of the lead auditor and audit team member
Eko Purwanto – Lead Auditor Eko Purwanto graduated as Bachelor of Forestry from Forest Conservation Department, Faculty of Forestry, Bogor Institute of Agriculture (IPB) in 2001. He owned working experience at Oil Palm Plantation in East Kalimantan since 2003 to 2012, the last position was Estate Manager. He has implemented good agricultural practice including integrated pest management and limited pesticides uses. He has completed lead auditor training courses for RSPO P & C (2013), ISO 9001:2008 (2012), ISO 14001:2004 (2013), ISPO (2012) and RSPO SCC (2012). He has also completed training course of ISO 14001 (2012), Minaut Indonesia (2011) and Introduction to HCV Toolkit HCV (2011). For the last 2 years he has been involved in quality (ISO 9001) management system audits for very broad industrial and involved in Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) audit for several plantations and mills since October 2012. Bayu Abirowo – Audit Team Member He is a Bachelor of Electrical Engineering from Trisakti University, Jakarta. He joined SAI Global in 2004 as Lead Quality Auditor for ISO 9001:2008 and was registered in IRCA. He has working and auditing experiences in manufacturing companies with large scale manpower and deals with various kinds and positions of interviewed people. He is also SA 8000 auditor certified by Social Accountability International since 2011. He has received training for legal requirements of land acquisition, customary rights, HCV (High Conservation Value) and social impact management in palm forestry. He was also trained for RSPO principles and criteria (P&C) and ISPO (2012) lead auditor. Edy Widodo – Audit Team Member Edy Widodo graduated as bachelor of the Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Technology, University of Padjadjaran, Bandung. Earlier he worked as an Assistant Estates Manager in PT SMART Tbk. (1999 to 2005). He joined SAI Global in 2013 as a Lead Auditor for ISO 9001: 2008. He has working experience in the industrial sector and audit Plantation, and also the processing industry and agricultural mechanization. He is also the ISPO auditor who has obtained a certificate from the ISPO Commission, Ministry of Agriculture of Indonesia, on February 2013. He had got a certificate of training on Understanding ISO 14001: 2004 & Auditing ISO 14001: 2004 in 2013. He also had joined RSPO P&C training (2013).
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 18 of 118
Audit Report
Dirgantara Bayu L – Audit Team Member Dirgantara Bayu L, owned a bachelor degree majoring in occupational health and safety from University of Indonesia. He owns a lot of experienced in field of QHSE MS (Quality, Health, Safety and Environment Management System) for several sectors of industry, such as: chemical manufacturing, construction and oil and gas exploration. He is registered as lead auditor (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 and ISPO) within the international professional auditor membership (IRCA & RABQSA) and also registered in local government ministry of manpower AK3U & HIMU (Safety Officer & Industrial Hygienists) and ISPO Lead Training Auditor from Ministry of Agriculture. He joined SAI Global Indonesia in 2012 and currently is a management systems auditor. Iwan Setiawan - Technical Specialist for HCV Issues He completed the education at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural sciences (MIPA), University of Padjadjaran. Experienced in researching wildlife, species management, protected area management, facilitating multi-stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation, facilitator and trainer for Natural Resources Management, and qualified in Community Based Biodiversity Assessment. He actively initiates and manages various nongovernmental organization focused on Biodiversity Conservation, also has done a number of studies of HCV in Palm oil plantations in various areas in Indonesia since 2012. Currently he is listed as RSPO Approved HCV Assessor – Team Leader. 2.4
Stakeholder consultation
Public notification was made on December 10th, 2013 and was published on RSPO website as well as SAI Global website. Stakeholder consultation was performed into internal and external stakeholders. Internal stakeholders included staffs and workers. External stakeholders were selected by considering that they have an interest in the organisation activities, directly border with organisation area where the workers live. External stakeholders included NGO, governments and civil societies. Letters were also sent to external stakeholders to invite for comment or individual / group discussions. Group and Individual discussions with stakeholders (Table 12) were conducted during the audit, to verify compliance against relevant criteria and indicator related to land status and conflict, environmental, social aspect and HCV. Surrounding Village of estate and mill has been chosen to represent societies. Group and individual discussion were conducted for two sessions. First session was conducted especially for surrounding stakeholders directly affected on estate and mill, i.e. Head of village, farmers. Second session was conducted especially for labour union, gender committee and selected workers. Group interview was conducted for workers with similar job while others were interviewed individually in the scope to verify compliance against relevant criteria and indicator related to infrastructure facility, labour, social aspect (discrimination and sexual harassment), environment and HCV. The result of stakeholder consultation used to justify fulfilment of some indicators, e.g. criterion 2.2 indicator major 3, minor 1 and minor 2, criterion 2.3 indicator major 1, criterion 6.5 indicator minor 1, criterion 6.6 indicator minor 1, criterion 6.7 indicator minor 1, criterion 6.8 indicator minor 1, criterion 6.9 indicator minor 1, 2 and 3, criterion 6.10 indicator minor 1 and 2, criterion 6.11 indicator minor 1, etc.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 19 of 118
Audit Report
The result of these consultations was provided in Appendix C on page 116. Table 12: List of internal and external stakeholders STAKEHOLDERS
METHODS OF CONSULTATION
Internal stakeholders ( mill & estates ) Head of SPSI
Group discussion
Head of Gender Committee
Group discussion
Workers
Group discussion for workers with similar role, otherwise individually interviewed
External Stakeholders ( mill & estates ) Head of Villages : - Talang - Semelinang Farmer groups (FFB Supplier / KUD) - KUD Katipo Jaya - KUD Bukit Makmur Social and Labour Agency (Dinas Sosial dan Tenaga Kerja Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu) Agriculture and Plantation Agency (Dinas Pertanian dan Perkebunan Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu) Environment Agency (BLHD Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu) National Land Agency (Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu) Sub District Police (Kepolisian Sektor Peranap)
Individual discussion
Sub District Head (Camat Peranap)
An invitation letter to comment was sent
NGOs: AMAN (Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nasional), GAPKI, Sawit Watch, WWF, Lentera Rakyat and Walhi Sumatera Utara District Head (Bupati Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu)
An invitation letter to comment was sent
2.5
Individual discussion
An invitation letter to comment was sent An invitation letter to comment was sent An invitation letter to comment was sent An invitation letter to comment was sent An invitation letter to comment was sent
An invitation letter to comment was sent
Date of next surveillance visit
The next surveillance visit will be 9-12 months from the initial audit. 3.0 3.1
AUDIT FINDINGS
Action taken on previous audit issues
This is initial certification; there were no previous audit findings.
3.2
Claim and use of certification mark and or logo
This is initial certification, no claim and use of RSPO certification mark and or logo.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 20 of 118
Audit Report
3.3
Description of audit findings
3.3.1 RSPO Principle and Criteria, Indonesian National Interpretation PRINCIPLES 1: COMMITMENT TO TRANSPARENCY REF 1.1 1.1.1 major
1.1.2 major
1.1.3 major
Guidance
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Oil palm growers and millers provide adequate information to other stakeholders on environmental, social and legal issues relevant to RSPO Criteria, in appropriate languages & forms to allow for effective participation in decision making. Are there any records of information requests?
Information response logbook
General Administration (KTU)
Information requests were registered in Logbook permintaan dan tanggapan terhadap permintaan informasi (information response logbook) such as: farm survey 2013 from BPS (National Statistics Bureau), monitoring of minimum wages implementation from Jamsostek, job apprenticeship from vocational school (SMKN1 Paranap).
Compliant
Are there any records of responses to information requests?
Outgoing mails and mailing register/ logbook, environmental inspection records
General Administration (KTU)
Records of responses to those information requests were maintained and traceable. Outgoing mails were also registered in a logbook to response following requests such as: manpower statistics January-June 2013, response to apprenticeship request from vocational school SMKN1 Pasir Penyu, response to BPS survey 2012, etc.
Compliant
Does records of information requests from stakeholders, and the responses given, be kept for a period determined in the applicable regulations and taking into account their relative importance?
SOP AA-GL-5008.1R1
General Administration (KTU)
Records were kept and retained for 3 years as described in procedure “penanganan permintaan informasi stakeholder” (stakeholder information request handling)
Compliant
Growers and millers should respond constructively and promptly to request for information from stakeholders. See criterion 1.2 for requirements relating to publicly available documentation. See also criterion 6.2 relating to consultation.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 21 of 118
Audit Report
REF 1.2 1.2.1 major
1.2.2 major
Guidance
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Management documents are publicly available, except where this is prevented by commercial confidentiality or where disclosure of information would result in negative environmental or social outcomes. Are management documents available and List of information that publicly available was Compliant - Logbook & list of General publicly available? information Administration established where most of information/ records were Note: sent to interested parties (stakeholders) in periodic request and (KTU) Information request and responses shall basis in order to comply with current regulation such responses 2013 include any relevant or required as: - Site Permit (Izin documentation, in accordance with Legal: Lokasi) & applicable national laws, such as: Copies of land use title (HGU) and licenses (Izin Plantation Legal: Lokasi, Izin Usaha Perkebunan), Operation Permit : Land titles/user rights (Site Permit (Izin SPUP (Surat Lokasi)), plantation operation permit (Ijin Environmental: Pendaftaran Usaha Usaha Perkebunan), land use title (Hak Management Document (AMDAL), environmental Perkebunan) Guna Usaha) or other documentation management and monitoring reports (‘laporan related to application for Land Use Title RKL/RPL’), Monthly land application activity report, 3 in accordance with relevant procedures. monthly hazardous waste management report, bi Environmental: annually air quality inspection report, bi-annually Environmental and social impact PUP report (plantation business progress), company assessment (AMDAL/UKL-UPL) and organization structure, high conservation value related monitoring reports (RKL-RPL). (HCV) reports and management plans, Social: - Documentation of social activities Social: of social and community programs. Social impact assessment (SIA) report, CSR - Health and Safety Plan planning and report, health and safety plan, - Continuous improvement plan continuous improvement plan, etc. Are records of information requests from stakeholders, and the responses given, kept for a period determined in the applicable regulations and taking into account their relative importance?
-
Letters from stakeholder,
-
SOP AA-GL5008.1-R1
General Administration (KTU)
All records were retained for 3 years as defined in a procedure
Compliant
Examples of commercially confidential information include financial data such as costs and income, and details relating to customers and/or suppliers. Data that affects personal privacy should also be confidential. Examples of information where disclosure could result in potential negative environmental or social outcomes include information on sites of rare species where disclosure could increase the risk of hunting or capture for trade, or sacred sites which a community wishes to maintain as private.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 22 of 118
Audit Report
PRINCIPLES 2: COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS Ref. 2.1 2.1.1 major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Evidence of compliance with applicable local, national and ratified international laws and regulations of Peranap Mill and Estate have been provided, including - valid permits: waste water discharge permit, river water and ground water abstraction permits, hazardous waste storage permit, boiler and pressurised vessel permits, lifting equipment, personnel who conducted lifting equipment, electrical - provision of required infrastructure waste water treatment ponds, hazardous waste storage, availability of MSDS, - environmental: periodic environmental parameter monitoring (stationary emission, ambient emission and ambient noise, moving source emission, waste water discharge quality, and ground water quality), - system of plant cultivation, oil palm plantation, - list of flora and fauna protected, - management of guard area, - paramedic and company doctor, medical check-up, safety committee, - minimum wage, labour law, occupational safety, employee social benefit. - transport and lifting equipment,
Major NCR 2014-02
There is compliance with all applicable local, national and ratified international laws and regulations. Is there evidence of compliance with laws and regulations, which concern the operation of oil palm plantations?
List of regulation compliance Procedure.AA-GL5001.1-R0 (Compliance to regulations and its change) Regulations compliance evaluation form (Reviewed 25 October 2013)
Sustainability Sub Department General Administration (KTU) General Administration (KTU) and/or Public relations (HUMAS)
(Closed)
Further, in the estate, other evidence that the company complies with relevant legal
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 23 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
requirements was implementation of tax payments (PPH Pasal 21) in 2013 which was paid on August 2013. The records were sighted for period October 2013. Status of compliance with laws and regulations were evaluated, and evaluation of compliance result indicated that compliance status was justified with reference to the objective evidence of compliance. Evaluation of compliance result indicated that compliance status was justified with reference to the objective evidence of compliance. Example: employment agreement, social security, training programs, employment list, CSR program and its implementation, list of employees, payroll and over time calculations, menstruation leave, result of environmental monitoring and measurement, hazardous waste manifest, etc. However there were several regulations especially for Health & Safety regulations issued by Ministry of Manpower were not yet updated such as: Permenaker No1/1981 occupational disease reporting, Permen No.25 /2008 Occupational disease diagnose and Kepmen No. 609/2012 regarding accident, etc were not available yet. Major Nonconformities: a. Compliance with several laws and regulations have not been evaluated, e.g. QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 24 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings -
2.1.2 major
Is there evidence of efforts made to comply with changes in the regulations?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
List of regulation compliance, Permentan 98/2013.
Procedure.AA-GL-
Sustainability Sub Department General Administration
PP 81/2012 (Pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga dan sejenisnya), - Per.Men LH 21/2008 (Baku Mutu Emisi Sumber tidak bergerak), - Per.Menkes 416/1990, Permenaker No.25/2008 (Diagnosis PAK), - KepMenaker No.609/2012 (Pedoman Penyelesaian kasus kecelakaan kerja dan PAK). - Per.Gub Riau No. 35/2007 (Limbah cair) b. Based on the latest resume medical check-up of audiometry test it was noted 16 mill employees and 34 estate employees were not in normal condition (hearing losses) also based on spirometer it was noted 22 estate employees had lungs restriction, however there was no further investigation (anamneses and diagnoses) from the medical doctor which is required by Permenaker No.2/1980 article 3 point 6. c. Some workers have not been covered by national insurance program (Jamsostek) as required by Kepmenakertrans no.150/1999, e.g. some PHL workers (81 harvesters and 62 people in maintenance work) Established procedure was described mechanism for updating latest laws and regulations and requires regular access to regulatory bodies to update information of laws and regulations. Update and compliance review against change of law and regulation
Status
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 25 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference 5001.1-R0 (Compliance to regulations and its change)
2.1.1 minor
Is there a documented system, which includes written information on legal requirements that the palm oil company should comply with?
Regulations compliance evaluation form (Reviewed 25 October 2013)
Memorandum No.017/GLAAS/MEMO/10/12
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Procedure.AA-GL5001.1-R0 (Compliance to regulations and its change) Regulations compliance evaluation form (Reviewed 25 October 2013)
Department in Charge (KTU) and/or Public relations (HUMAS)
Sustainability Sub Department KTU
Audit Findings
Status
was conducted annually. Organization has reviewed and updated the regulation in October 2013. Evaluation against regulation was performed annually. The last evaluation was performed on th 25 October 2013 to all applicable law listed in “evaluasi kepatuhan hukum” (list of regulation compliance). For instance, the newest regulation was Permentan no.98/ 2013. Awareness to this regulation was sent through th email (10 October 2013) to respective people in the form of “matriks sosialiasi permentan 98/2013” to identify key points in the regulation. Memorandum (No.017/GL-AAS/MEMO/10/12) defined that it is the responsibilities of General Administration (KTU) and/or Public Relation (HUMAS) to conduct visits to the local government offices (PEMDA) in order to update new regulations published and/or changes within existing regulation, the records were sighted of “work visit verification” to the local government of Peranap dated January 2013. Valid applicable laws and regulations were registered including detail requirement applied. Updating of law and regulations change activities were well documented and last update was performed in May 2013. Updating of regulation in October 2012 was sighted. Information on applicable legal and other requirements have been reviewed and summarised.
Compliant
A list of “evaluasi kepatuhan hukum” has been
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 26 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
created to demonstrate compliance against law & regulation that includes environment, safety, legal and labour aspects. E.g. compliance against UU no.13/2003 (labour regulation), Permentan PER/01/MEN/1982, UU no.1/1970 (safety regulation for workers).
2.1.2 minor
Is there a mechanism for ensuring that compliance with relevant legal requirements is implemented?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
SOP AA-GL5001.1-R0
Procedure.AA-GL5001.1-R0 (Compliance to regulations and its change)
Regulations compliance evaluation form (Reviewed 25 October 2013)
Sustainability Sub Department General Administration (KTU)
There were valid documented forms and procedures to describe the evaluation of regulation and periodically reviewed, such as: Procedure.AA-GL-5001.1-R0 (Compliance of regulations evaluations). Regulations compliance evaluation form (Reviewed in October 2013). Mechanism for ensuring compliance with all applicable local, national and ratified international laws and regulations were described in procedure. Evaluation of compliance with regulation was conducted by Sustainability Sub Department and Mill and Estate Manager.
Compliant
A documented procedure has been established to describe method to identify new / revised law & regulation including awareness and implementation of those laws within the company. As defined within the procedure No. AA-GL5001.1-R0 that the mechanism for ensuring compliance with all applicable local, national and ratified international laws and regulations were described in procedure. Evaluation of compliance with regulation was conducted by
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 27 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings Sustainability Sub Department administration officer (KTU).
Guidance
Status and
Identifying inconsistencies between national, regional and local regulations. Implementing all legal requirements is an essential baseline requirement for all growers whatever their location or size. Relevant legislation includes, but is not limited to, regulations governing land tenure and land-use rights (including customary rights), labour, agricultural practices (e.g. chemical use), environment (e.g. wildlife laws, pollution, environmental management and forestry laws), storage, transportation and processing practices. It also includes laws made pursuant to a country’s obligations under international laws or conventions (e.g. the Convention on Biodiversity, CBD). Furthermore where countries have provisions to respect customary law, these must be taken into account. For small-scale produces the focus should be on the grower having adequate knowledge of the main legal requirements and implementing them. Key international laws and conventions are set out in Annex List of Related Laws and Regulations
2.2 2.2.1 major
The right to use land can be demonstrated, and is not legitimately contested by local communities with demonstrable rights. Are there documents showing ownership or Decree of the Head of Copy of land title (HGU) of Rigunas Agri lease of the land in accordance with administration – State Minister of Utama was sighted and legally owned by the relevant laws? KTU Agrarian Affairs / company. Copy of land use title was available Head of National and well maintained in the office of Peranap Land Agency No. Estate, while the original one was kept in the 18/HGU/ regional Office Pekanbaru. Land use title BPN/2000 dated mentioned that the land was located at Pauh 27 April 2000 and Ranap Village, Peranap Sub District, Indragiri Land use title Hulu District, Riau Province. permit: HGU No. Site Permit (Izin Lokasi) issued as indicated in 3 issued on 21 Decree of the Governor / Head of the Provincial June 2000, valid th Riau, No. KPTS.78/IL-VI/1992 dated 24 June to 24 June 2035. 1992, concerning: Site Permit and Acquisition / Total area: Purchase of Land in the Sub District Pasir 5,214.242 Ha, Penyu and Peranap, District Indragiri Hulu for located in Pauh Oil Palm Program PIR-TRANS, on behalf of PT. Ranap Village, Rigunas Agri Utama, area of ± 12,857 ha. Peranap Sub District, Indragiri Approval of providing land from Governor of Hulu District, Riau Riau No. 525.26/PPD/418 dated 13 February Province 1984. And Riau Governor's letter No.525 / BKPMD /2295 dated August 2, 1988, concerning: Allocation forest areas for plantation of PT. Agri Rigunas Utama, area of ±
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 28 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
39,000 ha, with the following provisions: 1. Area of ± 27,500 ha is conversions production forest. 2. Covering an area of ± 11,500 ha a production forest by the exchange area of forest conversions, in accordance with the decree of the Governor of Riau nd dated 2 August 1988 No. Kpts381/VIII/1988. Ministry of Forestry Decree no. 690/Kpts-II/92; th Date 9 July 1992, concerning: The release of most the forest area which is located in Forest S.Serangge, Districts/DT II Indragiri Hulu, Riau Province, covering an area of 28,717.5 ha Plantation Operation Permit / Surat Pendaftaran Usaha Perkebunan (SPUP) No. HK.350/94 / th Dj.Bun.5/II/2002 dated 28 February 2002, with details: Company
: PT. Rigunas Agri Utama
Plant Type
: Palm Oil
Site Kelayang, Province
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
: Sub District Peranap and District Indaragiri Hulu, Riau
Area
: 5,215.242 Ha
Processing
: 1 unit of palm oil mill
Licensed Capacity
: 60 tons FFB / hour
Installed capacity
: 30 tons FFB / hour
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 29 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Plantation Business Assessment (Penilaian Usaha Perkebunan (PUP)); Class II, based on the Decree of the Governor of Riau No. st Kpts.848/VIII/2011, dated 1 August 2011 The plantation has a land rights area of 5,215.242 ha, by Decree of the Head of National Land Agency (Badan Pertanahan th Nasional), No.18/HGU/ BPN/2000, dated 27 April 2000 and Land Title (HGU) No. 03; Ranap Pauh village, Sub District: Peranap and Kelayang, District Indragiri Hulu, Riau Province, st dated 21 June 2000 and Letter of Measurement No. 01/Inhu/2000, areas th 5,215.242 Ha, valid until 24 June 2035. Building Permit (IMB): th
1. No. 28/IMB/2000, 7 September 2000, from District Head Level II Indragiri Hulu, to establish a new building workshop, warehouse and Palm Oil Mill, no permanent construction with the size of the 2 building area is 9,404 m , located in the Semelinang Tebing Village, District Peranap. Built on Land Certificate No. st HGU. 03, dated June 21 2000. 2. Building Permit (IMB) No. 93/BPMD & PPT/BP-IMB/IV/2013, dated 10 April 2013 from Head of the Regency Investment Board (KBPMD). Construction of permanent buildings with a total area of 2 24,857 m : afdeling office, plasma office, employee housing, mess, polyclinic,
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 30 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
warehouse, sport hall, canteen, baby care, traction / workshop, security post, generator room and parking area. 2.2.2 major
Is there evidence that legal boundaries are clearly demarcated and visibly maintained?
Area Measurements by BPN, measurement certificate no. 01/Inhu/2000 and Situation Map No.12/1997 dated 1 August 1997 with scale 1 : 40,000. BPN peg maintenance program and report (check list)
Head of administration – KTU
Area has been measured by BPN, measurement certificate no. 01/Inhu/2000, and recorded on the Situation Map / HGU map with a scale of 1: 40,000, dated 01/08/1997, no. 12/1997.
Major NCR 2014-03 (Closed)
Legal boundaries marker were sighted during the audit and maintained along the perimeters of estate lands which were mapped with Global Positioning System (GPS). Field observation was conducted to pegs number: -
Peg HGU No. : S:05060 (0º 35.380' N and 102º 02.481' E), Block A 96 B
-
Peg HGU 45 (0º 38.049' N and 102º 02.506' E), block C93F
-
Peg HGU 26 (0º 35.641' N and 102º 04.171' E), block B96F
Major Non Conformities:
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Map of HGU pegs was not entirely equipped with BPN numbering and coordinate and peg conditions was poorly maintained.
Records / documents such as map of BPN pegs, list of BPN pegs with its coordinates and maintenance of pegs (legal boundaries) cannot be shown during the
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 31 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
KTU/legal
No disputes found referring to public consultation result under “interview summary” page.
Compliant
audit.
major
Where there are, or have been disputes – are there proof of resolution or progress towards resolution processes acceptable to all parties are implemented?
2.2.1 minor
Is there evidence of land acquisition resolution with free prior and informed consent?
Pact of agreement
KTU/legal
Land acquisition from local communities has been performed through prior and informed consent as recorded in "surat persetujuan bersama” (pact of agreement). No force has been applied (free), informed consent were given to the previous owner.
Compliant
2.2.2 minor
Is there a mechanism to resolve conflict which is accepted by all parties?
SOP AA-GL-5003.1R1
KTU/legal
No land conflict identified (refer to result of public consultation) but a procedure has been established to describe conflict mechanism.
Compliant
2.2.3
Guidance
Where there is a conflict on the condition of land use as per land title, growers should show evidence that necessary action has been taken to resolve the conflict with relevant parties. For any conflict or disputes over the land, the extent of the disputed area should be mapped out in participatory way. Ensure a mechanism to solve the conflict (Criteria 6.3 and 6.4). All operations should cease on land planted beyond the legal boundary.
Any customary land use rights or disputes which are likely to be relevant should be identified.
2.3 2.3.1 major
2.3.2 major
Use of land for oil palm does not diminish the legal rights, or customary rights, of the other users, without their free, prior and informed consent. Are there records of any negotiated agreements between traditional owners of land and plantation companies (if any), supplemented with maps in appropriate scale?
N/A
Estate
Are there maps of an appropriate scale showing extent of recognised customary rights?
N/A
Estate
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Based on Social Impact Assessment and public consultation there were no customary rights in the land.
Not applicable
Based on Social Impact Assessment and public consultation there were no customary rights in the land.
Not applicable
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 32 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
2.3.3
Are there copies of negotiated agreements detailing process of consent?
major Guidance
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
N/A
Estate
Based on Social Impact Assessment and public consultation there were no customary rights in the land.
Not applicable
Where lands area encumbered by legal or customary fights, the grower must demonstrate that these rights are understood and are not being threatened or reduced. This criterion should be considered in conjunction with criteria 6.4, 7.5 and 7.6. Where customary rights areas are unclear these are best established through participatory mapping exercises involving affected and neighbouring communities. This criterion allows for sales and negotiated agreements to compensate other users for lost benefits and/or relinquished rights. Negotiated agreements should be non-coercive and entered into voluntarily, carried out prior to new investments or operations and based on an open sharing of all relevant information in appropriate forms and languages, including assessments of impacts, proposed benefit sharing and legal arrangements. Communities must be permitted to seek legal counsel if they so choose. Communities must be represented through institutions or representatives of their own choosing, operating transparently and in open communication with other community members. Adequate time must be given for customary decision-making and iterative negotiations allowed for, where requested. Negotiated agreements should be binding on all parties and enforceable in the courts. Establishing certainty in land negotiations is of long-term benefit for all parties. For definition of “customary rights”, see definitions.
PRINCIPLES 3: COMMITMENT TO LONG-TERM ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL VIABILITY Ref. 3.1 3.1.1 major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
There is an implemented management plan that aims to achieve long-term Is there a documented working plan of Mill Projection minimum of 3 years period? 2014 – 2017 Note: documented working plan shall Management Plan include plan for new acquisition which have 2014 – 2016 not replaced primary forests or HCVs to Mill Operation comply with RSPO requirements. Summary 2013
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Audit Findings
Status
Management plan during the three-years period 2014 - 2016 was used to achieve economic viability and long-term financial. The plan was approved by the top management. The parameters listed in the management plan which includes revenue and earnings, projected crop production (FFB yield trend), the extraction rate of CPO and PK (Production forecast up to 2017), harvesting, processing FFB and CPO. The achievement of the management plan is reviewed every month in the Estate Unit Report (LUK) and Mill Unit Report (LUP) according to the current month. Reviewing of LUK and LUP was conducted
Compliant
economic and financial viability. Regional Office Estate and Head Office
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 33 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
for period 2013. 3.1.1 minor
Is there annual replanting programme, where applicable, projected for a minimum of 5 years with yearly review?
Guidance
Whilst it is recognised that long-term profitability is also affected by factors outside their direct control, top management must be able to demonstrate attention to economic and financial viability through long-term management planning. The business or management plan may contain:
Replanting Plan Year 2018 – 2023 PT Rigunas Agri Utama
Estate and Head Office
Replanting Program was available for Year 2018 2023 the total area of 3,658 ha.
Compliant
Attention to quality of planting materials Crop projection = FFB yield trends Mill extraction rates = OER trends Cost of Production = cost per tonne of CPO trends. Forecast prices. Financial indicators.
Suggested calculation – trends in 3-year running mean over the last decade (FFB trends may need to allow for low yield during major replanting programmes). Growers should have a system to improve practices in line with new information and techniques.
PRINCIPLES 4: USE OF APPROPRIATE BEST PRACTICES BY GROWERS AND MILLERS Ref. 4.1 4.1.1 major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Operating procedure are appropriately documented and consistently implemented and monitored Are there Standard Operating Procedures "Agriculture Policy Estate The documented Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for estates, from land clearing to Manual" dated 1 (SOP) for Estate was evident: harvesting? February 2013 AA-APM-OP-1100.01-R1 Nursery
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
AA-APM-OP-1100.02-R1 Land Preparation
AA-APM-OP-1100.03-R1 Creation and Maintenance of Road
AA-APM-OP-1100.04-R1 Creation and
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Status
Compliant
Page 34 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Maintenance Trenches
4.1.2
Are there Standard Operating Procedures
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Mill Policy Manual
Mill Manager
AA-APM-OP-1100.05-R1 Soil and Water Conservation
AA-APM-OP-1100.06-R1 Planting Leguminous Cover Crop
AA-APM-OP-1100.07-R1 Oil Palm Planting
AA-APM-OP-1100.09-R1 Manuring
SOPs for IPM: o
AA-APM-OP-1100.10-R1 Pest & Diseases Control
o
AA-APM-OP-1100.08-R1 Weeding Control
o
AA-APM-OP-1100.14-R1 Census and Identification Plant
AA-APM-OP-1100.11-R1 Management Pesticides
AA-APM-OP-1100.12-R1 Castration
AA-APM-OP-1100.13-R1 Pruning
AA-APM-OP-1100.15-R1 Census of Production
AA-APM-OP-1100.16-R1 Consolidation
AA-APM-OP-1100.17-R0 Water Management
AA-APM-OP-1100.18-R1 FFB Harvesting
AA-APM-OP-1100.19-R1 Transportation Management
AA-APM-OP-1100.20-R1 Replanting
The documented procedures regarding processing
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 35 of 118
Audit Report
Ref. major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS (SOPs) for mills, from reception of FFB to dispatch of CPO and PK?
Reference
Department in Charge & Staff
Audit Findings
Status
activities of palm oil were already described within the “Mill Policy Manual” (MPM) document which was approved by Operations Director. The manual consisted of each processing station starting from FFB (Fresh Fruit Bunch) receiver until the CPO delivery and also includes the procedure of machineries preventive maintenance, utilities and quality control. Generally the procedures that currently existing are within the revision 01 (code R1) that was officially published in 2009, except for several procedures for mills were already on revision-2 (code R2). Herewith the procedures consists within the MPM such as: AA-MPM-OP-1400.02-R2 FFB Receiver Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.03-R1 Sterilizer station Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.04-R1 Threshing station Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.05-R1 Digesting and Screw Press station Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.06-R1 Clarifier station Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.07-R1 Nut Polishing Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.08-R1 Kernel station Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.11-R1 Water Treatment Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.12-R1 Laboratory Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.14-R2 Storage and delivery
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 36 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.15-R1 Preventive machineries maintenance Procedure AA-MPM-OP-14000.13-R1 – WWTP Process 4.1.1 minor
Are there records of at least annual checking and monitoring of operations?
-
Special Visit Report No. KPNSVR03-2013 date of visit 10-12 December 2013
-
Mill Operation Summary 2013
-
Crop & Production
-
Mill Utilisation
-
Mill Operation Summary (MOS) YTD December 2013
-
Regional Office
-
Estate, Mill and Head Office
-
Mill Manager
A special visit was made by VA (Visit Agronomy) personnel from Regional Office to the Estate and VM (Visit Mill) personnel to the mill primarily to identify main problems, review the actual criteria and standards of harvesting practised by the Estate with a view to provide solution to reduce crop losses, improve production and OER. Items checked were weeding, manuring, pest and diseases, pruning and drainage.
Compliant
Production FFB in 2013 Budgeting
Realization
Up to This Month
Up to This Month
Item
UOM
Acception of FFB
Kg
Nucleus Estate
Kg
107,754,998
97,300,770
90.30%
Plasma
Kg
103,932,000
95,823,250
92.20%
Outer Estate
Kg
49,999,999
37,228,580
74.46%
261,686,997
230,352,600
88.03%
6,907,320
3.00%
Sub Total Potongan/Sortasi
Kg
%
CPO Production Nucleus Estate
Kg
25,591,813
21,999,068
85.96%
Plasma
Kg
23,336,388
20,487,518
87.79%
Outer Estate
Kg
9,550,000
6,814,644
71.36%
58,478,201
49,301,230
84.31%
Sub Total Palm Kernel
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Kg
Nucleus Estate
Kg
5,980,403
5,195,781
86.88%
Plasma
Kg
5,766,561
5,101,767
88.47%
Outer Estate
Kg
2,775,000
1,994,242
71.86%
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 37 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings Sub Total
Status
14,521,964
12,291,790
84.64%
Rendemen CPO Nucleus Estate
%
23.75%
22.61%
95.20%
Plasma
%
22.45%
21.38%
95.22%
%
19.10%
18.30%
95.84%
Nucleus Estate
%
5.55%
5.34%
96.21%
Plasma
%
5.55%
5.32%
95.96%
Outer Estate
%
5.55%
5.36%
96.52%
Outer Estate Rendemen Palm Kernel
It was noted that each mill unit also Peranap mill has “Mills Operation Summary” (MOS) which is updated monthly and also summarized in to year to date rated within a year. MOS was a report that consists of regarding quantity and quality of received FFB, mill capacity utilization, CPO and kernel extraction, quality, stock and delivery and also process control, oil losses at each station, utility report (water and boiler), waste quality and also operational budgeting report. The summary tabulation of production realization and target at Peranap mill within 2013 includes FFB from centre estate also third party (within a tonnage, except OER and KER are %): Annual Target Total Processed FFB
261.657
230.353
CPO Product
58.478
49.301
Kernel Production
14.522
12.290
22.35
21.40*)
OER
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Realization (2013)
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 38 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
(22.63–own estate) KER
5.55
5.34 **) (5.33 – own estate)
*) OER total including FFB from outgrower **) KER total including FFB from outgrower
4.1.2 minor
Are there records of operational results?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Daily work plan (RKH = Rencana Kerja Harian) BKM (Buku Kerja Mandor) LUK (Laporan Unit Kebun) Daily Report of each processing station Daily Laboratory Report Laporan Harian Pabrik (LHP) LUP (Laporan Unit Pabrik Mill Operation Summary (MOS)
Mill and Estate
Inspection and Monitoring of Plantation Operation
Compliant
Head of Assistant and Field Assistant Division inspected and monitored the activities at the site on a regular basis. In daily activities Estate Foreman made Daily Work Plan (RKH: Rencana Kerja Harian), then further was noted that the realization of the activities was recorded in the Log book of group leader activity (BKM: Buku Kerja Mandor), which contains a record of the type of activity (maintenance/weeding, harvesting, census, spraying etc.), number of employees, number of agrochemical used, the amount of output and activity location (block). Checking of harvesting activities was conducted by the harvest foremen and foremen-I. Harvest foremen recorded the inspection harvest (Monitoring Ancak Panen), inspection items: preparing the midrib, ripe fruit was not harvested, the fruit lagged (not harvested) and cut raw fruit. The examination and transport of FFB were performed by Adm. Harvest (Kerani Panen), inspection items: FFB maturity and loss of fruits (berondolan) including cutting the fruit stalk (V = mouth frog system) and recorded in the form of transport and the quality of the fruit (FFB Transports form). Estate unit report summarised the Estate activity, performance and product on each month.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 39 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Inspection and Monitoring of Mill Operation It was observed during the audit that the records were reviewed in accordance to the processing control demonstration were in good implementation based on procedure defined, such as: The received FFB weight records were sighted and demonstrated as defined within the procedure. The mill has two weighbridges, each has a capacity of 50,000 Kg and also already calibrated by Metrology Body the Ministry of Industrial. The certificates of th Tare were available at the mill and still valid until 4 October 2014. The records of FFB receiving were sighted during the audit (several records within a period of November 2013) which showed that the defined procedure and rules were implemented accordingly. FFB sortation / grading was performed to control the quality of FFB that went into Peranap Mill. Records of sterilizer station showed that the implementation of sterilizing was conducted according to defined procedure. Sterilized process was conducted on three stages (peak) with total time were 75 minutes. Every peak has different pressure 2 between 5 kgf/cm which starts at peak-1 with 2 pressure 2 kgf/cm (28,44 psi) and ended at peak-3 2 with pressure 2.8-3.0 kgf/cm (39,82-42,66 psi). Every stage of peak was recorded into the graphic paper and daily log book of sterilizer station operator. The digesting and pressing process were reviewed during the audit and showed that the processes were conducted according to the defined procedure QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 40 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
that the temperature of processing shall be at least 95°C. The records were sighted at daily log book pressing station operators. The records of clarification station process were conducted according to the defined procedure such as vacuum drier and temperature were established within the range of -0,7 until -0,8 cmHg and 80-85 Celsius. The temperature within the tanks CST 95 Celsius and COT 95 Celsius. The records were sighted at daily log book clarification station operators. The records of quality control inspection at each process were filled in to “Daily Report Laboratory”; include the testing of water quality usage as utility support material. Generally the processing at kernel station was controlled as required within the procedure such as the silo temperatures were established within a range 70-80 Celsius. The preventive maintenance for processing machineries were conducted based on the schedule established for weekly, monthly, and annually also based on operating hours. The results for maintenance were recorded in the log book of each machine. The calibration of measuring equipment was conducted both internally and externally. Regarding the internal calibration, the results of each calibration were recorded within the calibration reports which consist of equipment type, standard and result of calibration. Several equipment calibration reports for internal were sighted such as for temperature indicators equipment, weighing and pH meter at
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 41 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
laboratory. Regarding external calibration was conducted by third party (PT Multiganda Scoteknik), such as for pressure gauge equipment which was last conducted on period of 2013. 4.2 4.2.1 minor
Practices to maintain soil fertility at, or where possible improve soil fertility to, a level that ensures optimal and sustained yield. Are there records of regular soil, leaf, and Research & Leaf sample analysis as a basis for fertilizer Leaf Sampling visual analysis? recommendations in 2014 has been carried out in Unit - Leaf Nutrient Development nd rd Analytical June 2013. Leaf samples were taken on 22 – 23 Analysis of Laboratory Mei 2013 (Ref no. 053/INT/RAU-R&D/MEI/L/12) and Peranap Estate sent to the Research and Development Centre PT. year 2013 Nusa Pusaka Kencana Analytical & QC Laboratory, to obtain analysis results and fertilizer recommendations.
Compliant
Diagnosis/leaf visual observations was done by considering the following criteria:
Comparison of green leaf with standard green colour (dark green).
The signs and symptoms (symptom) of nutrient deficiency.
Symptoms of pests and plant diseases.
The result of this visual monitoring was conducted by R & D Centre and the monitoring results were reported in the leaf samples and submitted to the Estate Manager. Visual monitoring is more regular performed by foremen and field assistant, with standard procedures based on Nutrient deficiency (symptoms), but it can also be a symptom of pest attack. Report included observation result and its recommendation for improvement.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 42 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
4.2.2 minor
Are there records of efforts to maintain and increase soil fertility (through use of fertiliser, planting of legume cover crops, compost, and land applications of POME or EFB) based on the result of analysis carried out as in point 4.2.1 minor above?
Manuring Program Year 2013 and 2014 Fertilizer Program and Realization period in 2013
Department in Charge Manuring Programs & Research
Audit Findings Programme and Realisation of Fertilizer for year 2013 in Peranap Estate
Type Fertilizer ZA Rock Phosphate MOP
4.3.1 minor
4.3.2 minor
Compliant
%
1,592,272
1,576,300
99.00%
376,437
372,350
98.91%
576,641
774,700
134.35%
45,797
45,800
100.01%
Dolomite
756,261
748,350
98.95%
23,366
23,200
99.29%
45,397,595
35,551,516
78.31%
227,456
145,945
64.16%
POME (M3)
4.3
Fertilization (Kg) Recommenda tion Realisation
Kieserite
HGFB Empty Bunch (EFB)
Guidance
Status
Long term fertility depends on maintaining the structure, organic matter content, nutrient status and microbiological health of the soil. Managers should ensure that best agricultural practice is followed. Nutrient efficiency must take account of the age of plantations and soil conditions.
Practices minimise and control erosion and degradation of soils. Are there maps of fragile soils? Topographic Map, Slope Class Maps and Map Soil Type and Slope Class Map scale 1: 40,000 Is a management strategy exists for SOP Land plantings on slopes above a certain limit Preparation (AA(needs to be soil and climate specific)? APM-OP1100.02-R1)
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Consolidation
Estate
There were no areas with fragile soils in Peranap Estate based on Map of Soil Type (Asian Agri Research and Development Centre Tebing Tinggi – Sumatera Utara, October 2012)
Compliant
Estate
The organisation has management strategy for planting on slopes above certain limit, as referred to company’s SOP and work instructions. The work instruction AA-APM-OP-1100.05-R1 described preparation for planting including planting on slopes area has been developed by organisation:
Compliant
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 43 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
(AA-APM-OP1100.16-R1)
Soil and Water Conservation (AAAPM-OP1100.05-R1)
Audit Findings o
o
-
Flat undulating 0 – 5
-
Rolling 6 - 12
-
Hilly 13 - 20
-
Steep >20
o
Status
o
o
o
o
System for planting on slopes area was provided through terracing, levelling of terrace, planting legume cover crops and determining of planting space. Site observation indicated that practices to control and minimize erosion have been applied by :
4.3.3 minor
Is a road maintenance program available?
Road maintenance plan years 2013 2014
Estate Office & Head of administration – KTU
Terracing
Making the catchment where runoff water, called: “Tapak Kuda”.
Making the catchment where runoff water, called “Rorak”.
Planting legume cover crop.
Road maintenance was done mechanically, based on the the road maintenance plan map in 2013.
Compliant
Road maintenance and repair activities using Motor Grader and Compactor, planned for 566,625 meters and the realization of 231,130 meters. Road maintenance work plan in 2014 was also available. The plan for 2014 is 353,480 meters and uses heavy equipment for 858 Hour Meter. Road maintenance program and its realization from January to December 2013
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
-
Grading
-
Hardening of the road
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 44 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Plan on hardening the road used gravel for 33,280 meter and the realization was 12,110 meter.
Plan hardening of the road use Krokos for 33,280 meter and the realization was 12,110 meter.
Road maintenance plan manually 1,001,862 meters, and has been realized up to October 2013, 868,828 meters.
Status
During field observation all main road and collection road were well maintained, although some collection roads were found slippery, but road improvement activity was sighted using heavy equipment (grading and compacting). 4.3.4 minor
Is subsidence of peat soils minimised under an effective and documented water management programme?
Map of Soil Type Unit (Asian Agri Research and Development Centre), January 2013
Estate
The organisation has a detailed soil map showing gradients and soil types. The soil map available in Peranap Estate, is Map of Soil Type Unit with scale 1:25,000 issued by Research & Development Centre. Based on the map there are no peat soil in Peranap Estate.
N/A
4.3.5 minor
Is a management strategy in place for other fragile and problem soils (e.g. sandy, low organic matter, acid sulphate soils)?
Map of Soil Type Unit (Asian Agri Research and Development Centre), January 2013
Estate
Based on Map of Soil type Unit, there are no areas of marginal land / fragile soil in Peranap Estate.
N/A
Guidance
Techniques that minimise soil erosion are well-known and should be adopted, wherever appropriate. This may include practices such as ground cover management, biomass recycling, terracing, and natural regeneration or restoration instead of replanting. For existing plantings on peat, water table should be maintained at a mean of 60cm (within a range of 50-75cm) below ground surface through a network of appropriate water control structures e.g. weirs, sandbags, etc. in fields, and Watergates at the discharge points of main drains (see also Criteria 4.4 and 7.4).
4.4 4.4.1
Practices maintain the quality and availability of surface and ground water. Is there protection of watercourses and Restoration of Estate wetlands, including maintaining and Riparian and
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
The Company has a procedure that prohibits the application of agrochemicals on the riparian area:
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 45 of 118
Audit Report
Ref. major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
restoring appropriate riparian buffer zones at or before replanting?
Areas surrounding Lakes/Reservoirs and springs (AAKL-12-EFP), issued on August 1 2010.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Report of analysis of river
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Environmental Field Procedure on the Restoration of Riparian and Areas surrounding Lakes/Reservoirs st and Springs (AA-KL-12-EFP), issued on August 1 2010. The Company has declared its HCV area of riparian to be 50 meters wide. The estate manager has followed this up with a Memorandum regarding river conservation and prohibition of agrochemicals application in the HCV areas (riparian, dyke, canal and estate boundaries), No. 229/GMnd RAU/MEMO/10/2012, issued on October 22 2012. This memorandum has covered the prohibition of some activities to protect and maintain the quality of water in the rivers (prohibition of agrochemicals application along the riparian area, weeding and tree root levering, disposing/discarding/throwing midrib to rivers and creeks. The document was available. For further elaboration, please see section for Criterion 5.2 Peranap Estate was traversed by Ketipo, Sengkilo, Pelangkawan, Rotan and Indragiri Rivers. Policy of riparian buffer zone management at or before replanting was provided in related procedure. Procedure mentioned that riparian buffer zone prohibits the application of agrochemicals on the riparian area. The other programs for maintaining and restoring of riparian buffer zones are:
Manual upkeep of weeds controlling in 0-10 m of riparian buffer zones.
Planting bamboo and ”Ketapang” at River and trench and planting Vertiver, Sungkai, Angsana
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 46 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
and Pohon Roda along the River.
4.4.1 minor
Is there an implemented water management plan?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Permit of ground water abstraction from Kepala Badan Penanaman Modal Daerah dan Pelayanan Perizinan Terpadu Kab. Indragiri Hulu No. 7/BPMD&PPT/BP /SIPPA-P/II/2013 dated 5 February 2013 valid for 2 years.
Mill Operational Report (LUP)
Mill
Put permanent pegs per 200 meters and paint the tree as boundary sign.
Not dispose stem to River and trench.
The organisation has declared its HCV area of riparian to be 50 meters wide. Quality of the Rivers was checked per 6 months by external laboratory. Last measurement was st conducted on 1 July 2013. Result of analysis mentioned that quality of the Rivers was in line with PP 82/2001. The main source of water for Mill activity is surface water – Ketipo river. Water Surface Permit “Surat Izin Pengambilan dan Pemanfaatan Air (SIPPA)” issued by government agency (Kepala Badan Penanaman Modal Daerah dan Pelayanan Perizinan Terpadu Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu) No. 7/BPMD&PPT/BP/SIPPA-P/II/2013 dated February th 5 2013, valid for 2 years. Flow meters were installed to monitor water usage. The organization has paid retribution to local government (Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Provisi Riau). The volume of water usage is monitored monthly both for process and domestic usage. Water consumption data July – December 2013 was sighted. The organisation has program to reduce water consumption, e.g. reduce floor cleaning using water, reuse sterilizer condensate water in clarification station, recycle water from oil cooler turbine to water basin. The company has also planted Sungkai (Peronema canescens), Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria) dan Bamboo (Bamboosa sp.) on the riparian.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 47 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Water use report period January to November 2013, th with report #072/MI-PPN/12/13 dated 6 December 2013. Surface water quality is monitored in per six months basis on Ketipo river, Rotan river, Indragiri river, Pelangkawan river, Sengkilo river, monitoring wells at Land Application area and non-Land Application area and employees drinking water source, . Surface water quality was analysed both for upstream and downstream. Monitoring was conducted by Dinas Pekerjaan Umum UPT Pengujian Provinsi Riau and environment laboratory of Faculty of Science Riau University. Result of surface water quality was nd reviewed for 2 Semester of 2013 against Government Regulation #82/2001 class II. Quality of river water was in line with Government Regulation #82/2001 class II. 4.4.2 minor
Is there monitoring of effluent BOD?
-
-
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Report of Analysis (01/MT.1/11.21.16 5.504) dated 05 December 2013 Analysis Report of Waste Water Quality (004/MIPPN/01/014) dated 28 December 2013
Mill
The company has conducted monitoring and analysis of BOD effluent based on KepMenLH 28/2003, Pergubri 35/2007, SNI 06-6989.72-2009 and RKL dokumen. The test results refer to the SNI 066989.72-2009. Analyses conducted by the Centre for Laboratory Testing DISKIMPRASWIL Riau Province, waste water sampling locations were at the outlet of st Aerobic 3 ponds on November 21 , 2013. Results of laboratory tests for BOD was 9,673.5 mg/litre with a load of 1.64 kg/tonne and pH 6.6, whereas quality standards based on ISO 06-6989.72-2009 for BOD is 5,000 mg/litre. Average discharge during monitoring is 3 630 m /day and production/use of materials on average during the month was 4,379 tonnes FFB/month.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Minor NCR 2014-04 (Closed)
Page 48 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Minor Non-conformities According to Report of Analysis of mill effluent dated th 5 December 2013, BOD value was 9,673.5 mg/l, while the standard based on KepMenLH 28/2003, Pergubri 35/2007, SNI 06-6989.72-2009 and RKL dokumen was 5,000 mg/l. 4.4.3 minor
Guidance
4.5 4.5.1 major
Is there monitoring of mill water use per tonne of FFB?
-
LUP (Laporan Unit Pabrik)
-
Report No. 072/MIPPN/12/13 dated 6 Desember 2013.
Mill
Mill water use per tonne of FFB was monitored monthly. Result of monitoring of mill water use per tonne of FFB was sighted for period July – December 2013. It was noted that mill water use per tonne of FFB period July – December 2013 was decreased being compared with budget.
Compliant
Growers and millers should address the effect of their use of water and the effects of their activities on local water resources. The Water Management Plan may include:
Taking account of the efficiency of use and renewability of sources. Ensuring that the use of water does not result in adverse impacts on other users. Avoiding contamination of surface and ground water through run-off of soil, nutrients or chemicals, or as a result of inadequate disposal of waste including POME. Appropriate treatment of mill effluent and regular monitoring of discharge quality, which should be in compliance with national regulations.
Pests, diseases, weeds and invasive introduced species are effectively managed using appropriate Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques. Is IPM plan documented and current? Estate Pest and Diseases management program of oil Compliant SOP AA-APMpalm plantations have been prepared within the OP-1100.10-R1 budget in 2013 and 2014. Pest & Diseases Control The SOP describes integrated pest control
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
SOP AA-APMOP-1100.11-R1 Management Pesticides
Pest and diseases
(integrated pest management/IPM) which combines various control techniques e.g. mechanical, biological, physical and chemical, applied early warning system (EWS) through periodically census for pests.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 49 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Stages program “Pest and Disease Control”, are:
management program
Visual observation (visual plant e.g. leafs or broken stems and fruit rot)
Conducting a census (to distribution and level of attack)
Control (manual, biological or chemical) e.g planting of Turnera subulatta (nest of natural predator caterpillars (Ulat Api)).
Census of evaluation (to see the effect of control).
determine
the
Pesticides used have been registered at the Ministry of Agriculture Pesticide Committee. Appropriate technical guidelines has been made for pesticide waste handling to minimize negative impacts on the environment, provided as appropriate SOPs and work instructions. Personnel who conducted IPM and pesticides spraying were well trained. Warehouse for pesticides storage was available. 4.5.1 minor
Is there monitoring extent of IPM implementation including training?
Realisation of IPM Programme Census
Estate
Monitoring was done by conducting a census of Crops Pests and Diseases. The results of rats Census in Afdeling III have been done in the period of December 2013: Attack 0.54% (from 5% the threshold).
Compliant
Pest Census Summary on caterpillars (Ulat Api) period December 2013. Recapitulation census on owl (Tyto alba) in the period September 2013, e.g.: Afdeling III, covering an area of 978 hectares, has plugged cages: as much as 39 cages. Referring to best practices management 1
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 50 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
cage cover 30 hectare, therefore the number of owl (Tyto alba) considered to be adequate. Trainings which have been delivered were: User Training and Paracol & Gramoxone Pesticides rd Limited, dated 23 of October 2012 and the certificate has been issued by the Government of Riau Province, Fertilizer and Pesticide Control Commission, valid for 5 (five) years since the launch nd (2 of January 2013). 4.5.2 minor
Is there monitoring of pesticide toxicity units (a.i. / LD50 per tonne of FFB or per hectare)?
Monitoring of Pesticides Toxicity Unit 2013 Estate Unit Report (Laporan Unit Kebun / LUK)
Estate Office & Head of administration – KTU & Researches Department
The company has monitored and recorded pesticides use in 2011, 2012 and 2013. Usage quantity of pesticides was within the recommended levels. Monitoring of pesticides toxicity unit LD50/tonne FFB was conducted at the end of financial year. Monitoring of pesticides toxicity unit was available for 2013. In the monitoring it was shown that the use of all pesticides was at 0.0022 gr/tonne FFB in 2013.
Compliant
Guidance
Growers should apply recognised IPM techniques, incorporating cultural, biological, mechanical or physical methods to minimise use of chemicals. Native species should be used in biological control wherever possible.
4.6
Agrochemicals are used in a way that does not endanger health or the environment. There is no prophylactic use of pesticides, except in specific situations identified in national Best Practice guidelines. Where agrochemicals are used which are categorised as World Health Organisation Type 1A or 1B, or are listed by the Stockholm or Rotterdam Conventions, growers are actively seeking to identify alternatives, and this is documented. Is there evidence of use of only approved Compliant The types of pesticides used by PT. Rigunas Agri Estate Unit Report Estate and registered agrochemicals permitted by Utama, Peranap Estate were: (Laporan Unit the relevant authorities? Kebun / LUK) 1. Gramoxone SL S 276, license number th RI.0101301197436, valid until 18 of March 2016. 2. Metsulindo 20 WP, license number RI rd 01030119991484, valid until 23 of June 2016. 3. Kenlon 480 EC, license number
4.6.1 major
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 51 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status rd
4.
5.
6. 7. 4.6.2 major
4.6.3 major
RI.01030120062433, valid until June 23 , 2016 Kenrane 288 EC, license number th RI.01010120103759, valid until 6 of September 2016. Eagle 480 SL, license number th RI.0103119941170, valid until 9 of January 2017 GARLON 480 EC, license number RI.695/9th 2008/T, valid until 6 of October 2013 Lindomin 865 SL, license number rd RI.0103011989867, valid until 23 of June 2016
Are there records of pesticide use (including active ingredients used, area treated, amount applied per ha and number of applications)?
Estate Unit Report (Laporan Unit Kebun / LUK)
Estate
Pesticides were used based on annual work programme. Activities using pesticides among others circle and path spraying, selective spraying etc. Records of pesticides use have been recorded including active ingredient, area treated, amount applied per ha, use of selective product and rotation number of applications. Several records of pesticide used were sighted, e.g. application schedule, list of pesticide use in oil palm estate, work achievement and pesticide use, stock card of agrochemicals. The records covered date of application, quantity of pesticide use and name of sprayers. The records were sighted in estate office. It was noted that dosage applied was according to annual programme.
Compliant
Is there documentary evidence that usage of agrochemicals is appropriate for the target species, given at correct dosage and applied by trained personnel in accordance with the product label and storage instructions?
Estate Unit Report (Laporan Unit Kebun / LUK)
Estate
Records of pesticides uses were well documented including active ingredient used, applied area and use per hectare and number of application rotation.
Compliant
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Dosage of pesticides use, target weed was in-line with the company Work Instruction, instruction on the label and storage instruction. It was noted that © SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 52 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
agrochemicals used were in-line with target pest, weed or disease, determined dosage, and applied by qualified person. It was noted that agrochemicals were applied by qualified people who have received limited pesticide training. All spraying operators have been trained. rd Training for all sprayers was conducted on 23 of October 2012. 4.6.4 major
4.6.1 minor
Are waste material from agrochemicals including pesticides containers are properly disposed in accordance with laws and regulations?
AA-AMP-OP1100.11-R1 and AAKL-04-EFP pesticide waste handling Hazardous waste manifest Balance of hazardous waste
Is there documentary evidence that use of chemicals categorised as World Health Organisation Type 1A or 1B, or listed by Stockholm or Rotterdam Conventions, and paraquat, is reduced and/or eliminated?
Weed eradication program using Paraquat period 2011 - 2013
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Estate
All agrochemical containers were triple rinsed and then managed by licensed vendor: PT. Elmusonsetindo Nusaindah for transporter and PT. Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa as processor. Hazardous waste manifests were sighted for handling of agrochemical containers on December th 9 2013. Liquid waste from agrochemical was reused for the next spraying application.
Compliant
Estate Office & Researches Department
All chemicals categorised as World Health Organisation type 1A or 1B, or listed by Stockholm or Roterdam Conventions. Paraquat which was the active ingredient of Gramoxone was still used in PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Estate, however the organisation has set internal target to reduce paraquat use. Data of paraquat used has been provided since 2009 to 2013, as mention below:
Compliant
Year
Unit
2009
Liter
2.064
2010
Liter
2.033
2011
Liter
4.877
2012
Liter
969
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Total
Page 53 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings 2013
Liter
Status
288
The use of Paraquat has been limited to a few species of ferns such as Stenochlaena and
Lycopodiophyta. 4.6.2 minor
Are there records of the results of health check-up for those who apply agrochemicals?
Summary of medical check-up 8-10 October 2013 and laboratory test result by “focus” clinic.
General administration (KTU)
The medical check-up was performed bi-annually. th th The last check-up was done in 8 -10 October 2013 to all workers related to agrochemical works such as: sprayers, fertilizers, storekeeper, lab analyst, etc. Recommendation was also communicated to respective employee.
Compliant
4.6.3 minor
Are there records showing that no work with pesticides for pregnant and breastfeeding women?
Monthly “form tes kehamilan” (pregnancy test reports)
General administration (KTU)
Pregnancy test was performed monthly to all female workers related to agrochemical works to prevent them working in unsafe condition. Breast feeding women are not allowed to work with agrochemical and reassigned for non-risky jobs.
Compliant
4.7 4.7.1 major
An occupational health and safety plan is documented, effectively communicated and implemented. Is there evidence of documented Documented policy related to occupational health & OHS Policy (dated OHS Officer Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) 26 November 2012, mills & estate. safety (OHS) was established and integrated to policy and its implementation? company policy also approved by Managing Director approved by th Sustainable (Kelvin Tio) dated November 26 2012 that consists Managing director) Department of: compliance to regulations, implement and MPM (Mill Policy monitoring OHS management system, setting Manual) objective and target, etc. APM (Agricultural Several documented procedures related to OHS Policy Manual) were integrated within the MPM (Mill Policy Manual) HSE Records forms: and APM (Agricultural Policy Manual). Also there Risk analysis were separated OHS Procedures and records established for operational activities such as: Job safety analysis (JSA) AA-KL-15-EFP Fire prevention for mills, offices
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Major NCR 2013-05 (Closed)
Page 54 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference HSE Procedures: AA-KL-15-EFP Fire prevention for mills, offices and housing AA-KL-14-EFP Estate emergency response procedure AA-KL-09-EFP Workshop safety prodecure include Lock/Tag out AA-KL-13-EFP Handling pressurized gas cylinders
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
and housing AA-KL-14-EFP Estate emergency response procedure AA-KL-09-EFP Workshop safety procedure include Lock/Tag out AA-KL-13-EFP Handling pressurized gas cylinders HIRARC Risk analysis JSA Job safety analysis However there were no clear rules and/or mechanism to ensure transporter personnel (especially the palm shell transporters; PT SDS/ PT SK) that concerns to OHS regulation as it was observed that several transporter personnel did not use proper PPE (Personnel Protective Equipment) and climbed the trucks above 2 metres height. Implementation records were sighted for several OHS programmes, such as: fire extinguisher inspections, hydrants maintenance checklists, resume of medical check-up include audiometry and spirometers and also workplace measurements for chemical and physical factors such as noise, vibrations, temperature and indoor air quality that comply to local government Permenaker No.13/2011. It has already conducted hazard identification and risk analysis within the scope of oil palm mill processes activities and agricultural estate activities as it has considered the stages of OHS risk control hierarchy such as elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative and PPE in order to OHS
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 55 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
risk precautions. Several mandatory PPE (Personnel Protective Equipment) were available by the organization to the employees and visitors such as: helmet, safety shoes, ear plugs, ear muffs and respirators. There was also deploying of several PPE symbols at the risk areas. There were also several working tools and machineries that utilized at mills, and estate was equipped with safety devices, such as knives covers that used by harvester and also pressure release valve at mill processing machineries. Emergency response equipment that provided by the organization such as first aid boxes that kept by each trained harvester supervisors, several fire extinguishers at the risk areas and also it was provided central clinic and ambulance units for each estates. Internal audit related to OHS management systems were integrated within the RSPO internal audit which th th conducted on 9 – 11 of October 2013 by internal auditor. Trimester reporting of OHS committee to local government (Ministry of Manpower) was periodically conducted as records were sighted for reporting period July – September 2013. Accident reports and records were reported to head office by using formats OHS indexes, there were also separated log book of accident records at the clinic. Regarding incident investigation were conducted by using forms (AA-SOP-OP-1400.02), the records of investigation were sighted as 3 (three)
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 56 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
accidents happened on estate harvester. Several tools and equipment which are regulated within the law were already certified and inspected by local government Ministry of Manpower (Disnaker Indragiri Hulu), such as: 2 units of boiler which has pressure capacity of 3 23 and 24 Kg/cm inspected date: April 2013; 3 units of sterilizer each with pressure capacity of 3.5 Bar; inspected date: September 2012. 1 unit compressor with pressure capacity of 150 Psi, 1 unit back pressure vessel with pressure capacity of 3.5 Bars and 1 unit steam separator with pressure capacity of 22 Bars were inspected on September 2012. 2 units of lightning rod installation, inspected date October 2013. 2 units of diesel motor (Generator) each capacity 300 KVA and 320 KW were inspected October 2013. Electricity installation approval with capacity 1200 KW, inspected date October 2013 1 unit steam turbine with capacity 1200 KW, inspected date October 2013. 4 units of lifting machineries, such as: Compactor, grader, tractor and excavator at estate also backhoe loader capacity 600 Kg at mill. As the result of inspections and testing, all equipments were summarized as safe and proper to be used.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 57 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Several license certificates were also sighted for personnel who have special competencies such as: 4 personnel (SIO) for steam boilers operators and pressurized vessels 2 personnel (SIO) operators of lifting equipment 1 personnel as certified welder 1 personnel as electrical technician
4.7.2 major
Are responsible person for health and safety program identified? Are records of their regular meetings with workers to discuss health, safety and welfare issues kept?
Organisation structure of P2K3 (OHS Committee): Decree letter No.14/DINSOSNA KERTRANS.04/P 2K3/X/2012; Decree letter No. No.13/DINSOSNA KERTRANS.04/ P2K3/X/2012. OHS briefings records OHS committee
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
OHS Officer mills & estate
Major Non conformities Based on observation during the audit, it was sighted several personnel of transporters, especially transporters of palm shell (PT SDS/ PT SK) were not wearing PPE (helmet and shoes) while loading the palm shell at the mill area. The transporter personnel also sighted climbing the trucks (above 2 metres height) to assist the loading activity. As per regulation by Ministry of Manpower, the organizations were complied with availability of OHS officer Mill and estate who act as OHS committee secretary at their units. The OHS committee (P2K3) was already established at mill with amounts 14 manuals as approved by Ministry of Manpower Indragiri Hulu with decree letter No.14 /DINSOSNAKERTRANS.04 /P2K3/X/2012; while at Peranap estate the OHS committee member amounts 50 personnel as decree letter No. No.13/DINSOSNAKERTRANS.04/ P2K3 /X/2012. Monthly safety committee meeting was held to review the OHS programme and performance. Records were sighted for Q1, Q2 and Q3 of 2013.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 58 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
meeting report for Q1, Q2 and Q3 year 2013 4.7.1 minor
Is there provision for accident insurance for workers?
Copies of insurance payment
4.7.2 minor
Is there regular health examination by a doctor for workers in stations or exposed to high-risk work?
Medical check-up report for period October-2013 (include physical examination, laboratory, audiometry and spirometer)
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Audit Findings
Status
Reports were quarterly submitted to local authority as required by local regulation. General administration (KTU)
Accident insurance was provided to workers and this also includes daily base workers, under the scheme “Jamsostek” as required by local regulation. Samples of workers for Mill and Estate were taken during this audit. The taken samples have been provided with accident insurance with percentage 0.89%. However not all employees were covered within the insurance as it is to be non-conformance within this audit report.
Compliant
General administration (KTU)
It was evident that general medical check-up within period October 2013 was conducted as it was planned once in a year; the medical check-up was conducted by third party clinic “Focus” with package such as: physical examination and specific measurement especially for audiometry and spirometers for high risk workers at mills and estate. As the result summary for the check-up, it was sighted that 16 personnel (from mill) and 34 personnel (from estate) were suspected to have hearing losses and also 22 personnel (from estate) were suspected to have lungs restriction and obstruction. However all of the suspected personnel was not yet conducted further analysis (anamneses & diagnose) in order to investigate either categorize as occupational disease or not. Since the hearing losses are categorized as occupational disease based on regulation Permenaker No.1/1981, that every occupational disease had mandatory shall be reported to the local
Compliant
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 59 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
4.7.3 minor
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Is there documented risk assessment for Occupational Health and Safety (OHS)?
Reference
Documented Risk analysis
Department in Charge
OHS Officer & OHS committee member
Audit Findings government ministry of manpower, however there were no any available reporting about it. Please refer to Major NCR 2014-02. The quantitative method of risk analysis was conducted for several activities at mill and estate, where the analysis method was described within the documented instruction that analysis considered frequency of hazard (level 1 – 5) and consequences of risks (level 1 – 5) that summarized the risk level from low risk to extreme risks. The mill’s risk analysis covered activities such as: transportation, weighbridge receiver, FFB sorter, loading ramp, transfer carriage, sterilizer, tippler, thresher, press, clarifier, engine room, water treatment, effluent plant, workshop, warehouse, diesel tank, laboratory, offices and traffic activities. While the estates’ risk analysis covered activities such as: Loading FFB, estate maintenance, fertilizer, pesticides & herbicides, harvesting, workshop activities at traksi and also warehousing. However several risky activities at mills were not identified yet as they are become non-conformance within this report. Within the risk analysis was also considered the hierarchy of control to take action of risk control such as elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative and PPE.
Status
Minor NCR 2014-06 (Closed)
Minor Non conformity Risk analysis result did not include activities in storage tank, where there was potential hazard related to the confined space and working at height. There was no available program to control these QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 60 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
hazards in the area of POM (e.g.: No gas detector for confined space work and no full body harness equipment for working at height, etc.) 4.7.4 minor
Are there records of OHS training?
Training schedule for year 2012 and 2013 Attendance list
General administration officer
Training record related to OHS was sighted and verified during this audit, e.g. boiler certificate and licence for boiler operator, licence for operator of generator set, licence of heavy equipment operator and basic OHS training performed internally.
Compliant
OHS Officer & ERT member
Several documented procedures related to emergency response were available, such as: Procedure for Fire handling & prevention at mill, offices and housing area (AA-KL-15-EFP) and also Estate emergency response procedure (KL-14-EFP). The emergency conditions have been identified including general fire, land fire, chemical spillage and earth quake. The procedure described the roles and responsibilities of each emergency response team including the mechanism of how to conduct medical evacuation to the nearby hospital/local health centre, the emergency contact numbers of each internal emergency team and external related parties such as public fire station at local area Kabupaten Kuansing and Public health centre “Puskesmas Peranap” were also available. The composition of emergency response team (ERT) was established (AA-447-01-LT) consist of ERT commander, head of transport and logistics and also several fire fighters and first aider. Accident reporting and investigation were
Compliant
Training certificate for boiler operator, heavy equipment. 4.7.5 minor
Is there accident and emergency preparedness procedure?
AA-KL-15-EFP Procedure Fire handling & prevention at mill, offices and housing area KL-14-EFP Estate emergency response procedure
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 61 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
documented in the form of RKK (AA-SOP-OP1400.02) to conduct the reporting and investigation of accidents. Accident and investigation reports described the accident chronology, cause and impacts of the accident and also to find the root causes of the accident happened and formulize the corrective and preventive action 4.7.6 minor
Is there evidence of OHS and first aid equipments available at worksites?
List of emergency tools Emergency kit inspection records (Monthly)
4.7.7 minor
Are workers trained in first aid should be present in both field and mill operation?
Emergency team chart Copies of emergency training (April 2013)
4.7.8 minor
Are there records of the occurrence of any work accidents are maintained and regularly reviewed?
Form of Report & Occupational Accident Investigation (AASOP-OP-1400.02) Monthly accident reporting OHS Committee (P2K3)
Guidance
OHS Officer & ERT Team
The emergency kits such as first aid box and emergency shower/eyewash were available at mill and several locations at estate. First aid kits were regularly checked as checklist was sighted. Mill and Estate were supported with one clinic centre and first aid room at each division office. The group leader (mandor) was provided with first aid kit.
Compliant
OHS Officer
First aid kits were sufficiently provided at Mill and Estates held by each group leader (mandor) at estate. Certified training related to first aid was on progress to be implemented next month, February2014, however currently the first aider was trained by clinic paramedics. During the audit, the group leader (mandor) was able demonstrate the use of first aid kit.
Compliant
OHS Officer
Accident number was reported on monthly basis. Quarterly accident statistic was also reported to local authority. Accident was followed up with treatment of the victim and accident investigation.
Compliant
Growers and millers should ensure that the workplaces, machinery, equipment, transport and processes under their control are safe and without undue risk to health. Growers and millers should ensure that the chemical, physical and biological substances and agents under their control are without undue risk to health when appropriate measures are taken. A safe and healthy working environment should be provided for all workers whether they are employees or contractors.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 62 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
KTU
Training programme for 2013/2014 was shown both for mill & estate such as: HCV, basic safety, basic fire, first aider, etc. training plan 2014 was also established that covered: diesel power operator, sustainability awareness, technical and managerial skill.
Compliant
The health and safety plan should also reflect guidance in ILO Convention 184.
4.8 4.8.1 major
4.8.2 major 4.8.3 major
Guidance
All staff, workers, small holders and contractors are appropriately trained. Is there any documented training Training plan 2013programme for staff, employee and 2014 scheme small holders in accordance with workers’ positions and competence?
Are the records of training for each employee kept?
Training attendance list, course certificate
KTU
Training records were maintained such as : first aider (May 2013), basic fire & awareness (November 2013), HCV awareness (November 2013), etc.
Compliant
Is there evidence that the company uses experienced or trained contractors?
Contract agreement and contractor profile
KTU
The company used experienced contractor for years such as school bus transportation and heavy equipment lease (PT. Karunia Mandiri Sejahtera Abadi). Sustainability training was also provided for some contractors.
Compliant
Training should be given to all staffs and workers by growers and millers to enable them to fulfil their jobs and responsibilities in accordance with documented procedures, and in compliance with the requirements of these principles, criteria and guidance. Contractors should be selected for their ability to fulfil their jobs and responsibilities in accordance with documented procedures, and in compliance with the requirements of these principles, criteria and guidance. Workers on smallholder plots also need adequate training and skills and this can be achieved through extension activities of growers or mills that purchase fruit from them, by smallholders’ organisation, or through collaboration with other institutions and organisations. For smallholders training records should not be required by anyone working on the farm should be adequately trained for the job they are doing.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 63 of 118
Audit Report
PRINCIPLES 5: ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND BIODIVERSITY Ref. 5.1 5.1.1 major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Aspect of plantation and mill management, including replanting, that have environmental impacts are identified, and plant to mitigate the negative impacts and promote the positive ones are made, implemented and monitored, to demonstrate continuous improvement. Is there documented impact assessment? - Mill and Documents of RKL and RPL were approved by Compliant Initial AMDAL on Estate Head of Indragiri Hulu Regency Environmental 8 July 2005 th - HSE, KTU Agency on July 8 2005. Document of RKL PT. Rigunas Agri Utama - Peranap Mill and Estate and RPL for PT. implemented procedure for identifying environmental Rigunas Agri aspect and evaluating its impact based on Utama, Peranap Environmental Management System ISO Mill and Estate 14001:2004. The result of environmental aspect, impact identification and evaluation were Procedure AAdocumented. Last review and update of EMS-431-PR environmental aspect and impact register for (Environmental st Peranap Mill and Estate were performed on April 1 aspect and impact 2011. identification) Peranap Mill and Estate have ensured that all Environment activities with significant environmental impacts were aspect – impact managed. Control measures were defined and evaluation (EMSimplemented for ensuring that negative 431-003-LT) environmental impacts were prevented or mitigated. There were two types of control measures defined: AMDAL document engineering control and administrative control. The 2003 implementation of those control measures were monitored during monthly environmental patrol and also round of internal audits. Social impact assessment result was documented in AMDAL document (released in 2003) covering some impacts such as: working opportunities, income, local perception, social conflict. Action plan (RKL/RPL) to address those issues were also established to address social issues such as :
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 64 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
interview with local communities and workers, dust & noise pollution control, field survey for contagious disease, health sanitation, etc. 5.1.2 major
5.1.1 minor
Are there records of regular report on environmental management in accordance with relevant regulations?
Are revisions to environmental management document if there are changes in companies operating areas or activities?
Report of RKL st RPL 1 Semester 2013
Receipt note of RKL RPL submission on August 2013
Initial AMDAL on 8 July 2005
Document of RKL and RPL for PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, Peranap Mill and Estate
Guidance
Procedure AAEMS-431-PR (Environmental aspect and impact identification)
Mill and Estate
Implementation of RKL RPL was reported regularly and the content has complied with RKL RPL document. The reports were submitted to Riau Province and Indragiri Hulu Regency Environmental Agency, Central of Environmental Management Regional Sumatera and Ministry of Environment.
Compliant
Mill and Estate
Initial EnvironmentaI Impact Assessment documents (ANDAL, RKL and RPL) which were approved by Department of Agriculture of Republic of Indonesia th on July 8 2005 based on Kpts.332/VII/2005 for PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, Peranap Mill and Estate were available.
Compliant
Internal environmental aspect and impact were evaluated as required by the procedure AA-EMS431-PR. Last review and update of environmental aspect and impact register were performed on April st 1 2011.
Documented impact assessment is AMDAL for plantation area ≥ 3,000 Ha and UKL/UPL for plantation < 3,000 Ha. In view of the fact that development activities in general will alter the environment, it is important to pay due attention to environmental components having the following characteristics: 1. Environmental components for which the functions must be maintained, safeguarded and preserved, such as:
protection forests, conservation forests, and biosphere reserves water resources biological diversity air quality natural and cultural heritage environment quality
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 65 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
2.
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
environmentally-oriented cultural values Environmental components which may undergo fundamental change(s), along with such change(s) as are considered important by the community in the area of the proposed business or activity, for instance:
land ownership and control employment and business opportunities living standards of the community
public health AMDAL is Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup consists of 3 (three) main documents; 1) Environmental Impact Assessment, 2) Environmental Management Plan, and 3) Environmental Monitoring Plan. The company must report periodically to related institution on environmental management and monitoring plan implementation. It is the responsibility of the company to provide sufficient objective evidence to the audit team that the full requirements of an EIA are met for all aspects of plantation and mill operations, and captures all changes over time. Environmental impact assessment should cover the following activities where they are undertaken:
Building new roads, processing mills or other infrastructure. Putting in drainage or irrigation systems. Replanting or expansion of planting area. Disposal of mill effluents (see criterion 4.4) Clearing of remaining natural vegetation.
Impact assessment may be a non restrictive format, e.g. ISO 14001 EMS and/or EIA report incorporating elements spelt out in this criterion and rose through stakeholder consultation. Documented management action plans addressing issues rose from the above impact assessment, which is monitored annually. Effect on the environment can be identified on soil and water resources, air quality (see criterion 5.6), biodiversity and ecosystems, and people’s amenities (see criterion 6.1 for social impacts), both on and off-site. Stakeholder consultation has a key role in identifying environmental impacts. The inclusion of consultation should result in improved processes to identity impacts and to develop any required mitigation measures. It is important that where activities, techniques or operations change over time during that time, identifications of impacts, and any required mitigation, are updated as necessary.
5.2 5.2.1 major
The status of rare, threatened or endangered species and high conservation value habitats, if any,which exist in the plantation or which could be affected by plantation or mill management, shall be identified and their conservation taken into account in management plans and operations Are there records of results of identification Document of HCV Regional A record of HCV Assessment in the form of a report, Compliant of any protected, rare, threatened or Office including a map of HCV area was available. HCV assessment 2012 endangered species, and HCV habitat? assessment was conducted in September 2012 by independent assessors from Forestry Department, Bogor Agriculture Institute. All assessors were approved in RSPO as HCV assessor - Discipline Specialist, coordinated by an RSPO approved HCV
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 66 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
assessor - Team Leader. The HCV assessment report was published in December 2012. Besides presenting data and map of HCV area, the report also includes a list of rare and threatened wildlife species from 3 (three) main wildlife groups: mammals, birds, and reptiles.
Description
HCV Type
Wide (Ha)
Ketipo River
1.2 & 4.1
32.70
Sengkilo River
1.2 & 4.1
78.88
Pelengkawan River
1.2 & 4.1
46.51
Todung River
1.2 & 4.1
32.00
Water ponds
4.1
10.00
Sacred graves
6
0.01
HCV Type:
5.2.2 major
If, rare, threatened or endangered species, or high conservation value habitats are present, are appropriate measures to preserve them to be taken?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Conservation Management Plan and Conservation Monitoring Plan
Regional Office Estate
-
HCV 1.2 : critically endangered species
-
HCV 4.1 : areas or ecosystems important for the provision of water and prevention of floods for downstream communities
-
HCV 6 : areas critical for maintaining the cultural identity of local communities
Based on the HCV assessment report, which includes a list of wildlife species, the Company has taken HCV protection and management measures: (i)
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Developed
an
HCV
Management
Major NCR 2014-09 (Closed)
and
Page 67 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Reference
Environmental Field Procedure the Restoration of Riparian and Areas surrounding Lakes/ Reservoirs and Springs (AAKL-12-EFP), issued on August 7 2014.
Environmental Field Procedure Conservation Area Monitoring (AA-PL-08-EFP), issued on August 1, 2010.
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Monitoring Plan. The Company gave the title for this document as “Conservation Management Plan and Conservation Monitoring Plan” (November 2012). The document is available. (ii) Conducted dissemination (awareness) about the existence of HCV in the Company’s concession area to the surrounding communities in September 2012, through a Public Consultation during the HCV assessment. Record of the participants’ list and the activity documentation was available. (iii) The estate manager has issued a Memorandum regarding river conservation and prohibition of agrochemicals application in the HCV areas (riparian, dyke, canal and estate boundaries), No. 229 / GM-RAU / MEMO nd /10/2012 on October 22 2012. This Memorandum is addressed to the Manager of RGU Factory, Chief Assistant, and all Assistants. Key points of the Memorandum are: (i) the prohibition of agrochemical applications along the riparian area, (ii) the prohibition of weeding (garuk piringan) and tree root levering (dongkel anak kayu) on riparian up to 10 meters wide, (iii) the prohibition of wildlife hunting, fishing using poison and or electric current, in the entire plantation area, (iv) the prohibition of disposing/discarding/throwing midrib to rivers and creeks, (v) the manager instruction of midribs were arranged in accordance to the Agricultural Policy Manual, (vi) recipients of memorandum were required to socialize to each staff and employees, (vii) an attachment
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 68 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
that contains the dos and the don’ts related with the conservation of HCV areas identified. The document was available. (iv) Conducted dissemination (awareness) about the existence of HCV and wildlife conservation to the Company’s employees, which was conducted through 2 (two) ways, i.e: Active method: Dissemination to the employees has been conducted in the period of September th nd 9 and November 2 , 2013, involving at least employees from various working units: assistants, foremans, office clerks, upkeepers, harvesters, tractions (evidence of implementation was available). Record in the form of participant list was available. Passive method: Establishing information /warning/prohibition boards related to the existence of HCV and wildlife conservation at 24 (twenty four) spots in the plantation area. Letters on several information /warning /prohibition boards have faded off, that made it unreadable. Record in the form of activities documentation was available. (v) Conducted a habitat protection in the riparian area with HCV. Activity was focused on prohibition of agrochemical applications and habitat enrichment in riparian area with HCV in certain locations with forest tree species. To support this effort, the Company has set up a small nursery. Records in the form of activities documentation and reports were available. (vi) Conducted a regular monitoring that was divided into six monthly monitoring and focused QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 69 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
on the inspection of damaged area, and six months monitoring that was focused on inventory of wildlife species and plants in riparian area with HCV. The document in the form of procedures was available. A record in the form of report was available. (vii) The Company doesn’t have SOP which is specific for the HCV management. It has 2 (two) SOPs which are relevant to certain elements of HCV protection, mainly biodiversity (HCV 1) and ecosystem services (HCV 4) in the Company’s concession area, with a focus on riparian: 1. Environmental Field Procedure the Restoration of Riparian and Areas surrounding Lakes/Reservoirs and Springs st (AA-KL-12-EFP), issued on August 1 2010. The document was available. 2. Environmental Field Procedure Conservation Area Monitoring (AA-PL-08EFP), issued on September 2012. The document was available. Major Non conformity The Company doesn’t have SOP which is specific for the HCV management.
Opportunity for Improvement: It could be considered to improve the HCV management and monitoring SOP. 5.2.3
Are measures taken for protecting species
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Conservation
Regional
In the available SOP the prevailing laws and
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Major NCR Page 70 of 118
Audit Report
Ref. major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS and their habitats in accordance with relevant laws and included actions to control any illegal or inappropriate hunting fishing or collecting activities?
Reference Management Plan and Conservation Monitoring Plan
Department in Charge Office Estate
Audit Findings
Status
regulations, particularly Act No. 5/1990 and Government Regulation No. 7/1999, have been referred. However, the SOP does not adequately cover all HCV area, all types of HCV existence in the plantation, and all HCV key elements.
2014-10 (Closed)
The HCV Management Plan and its implementation have not covered conservation and monitoring of rare or threatened species and their habitats, which are HCV 1 key elements: Southeast Asian Box Turtle Coura amboinensis, and Southeast Asian Soft shell Turtle Amyda cartilaginea. Controls of illegal wildlife hunting, fishing, or harvesting, have not been implemented in a planned and consistent manner. Efforts are limited to the establishing of information/warning/prohibition boards. An intensive and regular monitoring and disseminations (awareness) to the workers, “plantation community” (workers and their families living in the housing complex inside the plantation) and surrounding community have not been conducted yet. Major Non conformities 1. The HCV Management Plan and its implementation have not covered conservation and monitoring of rare or threatened species and their habitats, which are HCV 1 key elements: Southeast Asian Box Turtle Coura amboinensis, and Southeast Asian Soft shell Turtle Amyda cartilaginea. 2. Controls of illegal wildlife hunting, fishing, or harvesting, have not been implemented in a planned and consistent manner. Efforts are QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 71 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings limited to the establishing warning/prohibition boards.
5.2.1 minor
Are posters and signs warning of the presence of protected species produced, distributed, and made visible to all workers, and the community, including guidelines in handling them?
Map of sign board location.
Information board installed
Sign board of protected species
Regional Office Estate
Status of
information/
The Company has conducted a dissemination (awareness) about the existence of HCV and wildlife conservation to the employees, which was conducted through 2 (two ways): (i) Active method: Dissemination to the employees has been th conducted in the period of September 9 and nd November 2 2012 (for the full description please see the previous section), (ii) Passive method:
Compliant
Establishing information/warning/prohibition boards related to the existence of HCV and wildlife conservation. The warning sign clearly described species that need to be protected completed with picture of the species. Prohibition boards mentioned activities prohibited, e.g. prohibition for illegal hunting and fishing. The information/prohibition/ warning boards were located in several areas: in front of the office, road side on the ways to HCV area, and also in HCV area. Information content and locations considered to be adequate. Opportunity for Improvement:
5.2.2 minor
Does company appoint dedicated and trained officers to monitor any plans and activities as above?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Organization Structure of Asian Agri Sumatera
Estate
It could be considered awareness by involving outside Estate.
It could be considered to improve information/ warning/prohibition boards.
to improve HCV other participants
The Company has an Environment & HCV Head Assistant and Conservation & HCV Officer staff. Both staffs are positioned at the Regional Office in Pekanbaru (Ukui Estate) with its coverage area
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 72 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
includes four plantations under Asian Agro Group, including PT. Rigunas Agri Utama. Their backgrounds of formal education, training and experiences of both staffs are sufficient for them to have basic competencies to develop HCV Management and Monitoring Plan, to conduct a regular monitoring on the implementation of the plan as well as to write up a monitoring report. Guidance
5.3 5.3.1 major
5.3.2 major
This information gathering should include checking available biological records and consultation with relevant government departments, research institutes and interested NGOs if appropriate. Depending on the biodiversity values that are present, and the level of available information, some additional field survey work may be required.
Waste is reduced, recycled, re-used and disposed of in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. Are all waste and pollutions sources Identification of waste and pollution sources from Mill and Result of identified and documented? Peranap Mill and Estate activities was evident. The Estate evaluation of sources of pollution, type and control method of environmental waste were documented, e.g. used oil, used oil filter, aspect and impact and used battery, medical waste, POME. Are estates and mills waste management Procedure waste handling including hazardous Procedure AA-KL- Sustainability and disposal implemented to avoid or waste handling has been established and Sub 06-EFP – reduce pollution? implemented. The procedure required waste to be Department, Handling of segregated from point of generation. In addition Mill Mill and Hazardous and Estate also established waste register, which Estate Waste. described wastes generated from each Procedure AA-KLactivity/location, its classification (organic, inorganic 07-EFP – or hazardous), and its control measure. Handling of Medical Waste. It was observed that organic and inorganic wastes were segregated at point of source. Mill and Estate Procedure AA-KLincluding housing have provided different colour of 11-EFP – waste bin for each type of waste. Organic and Handling of inorganic wastes from Mill and Estate including Laboratory Waste. housing were disposed to landfill in the Estate area. Form AA-KL-601Areas of organic and inorganic wastes disposal were FM – Record of far from housing, in the flood-free area, not in
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Major NCR 2014-07 (Closed)
Page 73 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference Hazardous waste
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Form AA-KL-602FM – record of hazardous waste circulation Form AA-KL-602FM – Record of hazardous waste uses. Permit of PT. Elmusonsetindo Nusaindah (KepMen LH 44/2010) as hazardous waste transporter and collector Permit of PT. Isano Lopo Industri (KepMen LH 16/2013) as hazardous waste collector , KepMen ESDM 289.K/10/DJM.O/ TU/2013 and KepMen ESDM 778.K/10/DJM.O/ TU/2013 as hazardous waste processor Hazardous waste
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
swamp area and completed with warning sign not burning wastes. Hazardous wastes generated by Mill and Estate were used oil, used oil filter, used battery, medical waste and used lamp. Temporary storage of hazardous waste was available to collect hazardous waste prior to be transported by licensed vendor. Temporary storage of hazardous waste still held valid permit from the Head of Investment and Integrated Licensing Service of Indragiri Hulu h Regency dated November 28t 2013. (4/BPMD& PPT/ BP-LB3/XI/2013) with permissible period 90 days and valid through 5 years. Disposal of hazardous waste was performed in coordination with Sustainability Department in Pekanbaru Regional Office. These hazardous wastes were managed by licensed vendor: PT. Elmusonsetindo Nusaindah for transporter/collector and PT. Isano Lopo Industri as collector/user. Disposal of hazardous waste was completed with manifest. Manifest of disposal was sighted for May 2013 and December 2013. Hazardous waste was reported to Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province and Central of Environmental Management Regional Sumatera. Receipt note was sighted. Major Non conformities
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 74 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
manifest dated 9 December 2013
5.3.1 minor
5.3.2 minor
Guidance
Is there management plan of hazardous waste and instruction of disposal of agrochemicals and their containers waste in accordance with the product label and existing regulations?
Record of hazardous waste
Record of economical waste
Are there records of waste monitoring or analysis?
Record of hazardous waste
Record of economical waste
5.4.1 minor
Status
Based on the existing manifest, hazardous waste nd shipment was made on May 22 , 2013 and th December 9 , 2013, the time interval exceeds the maximum temporary storage limit (90 days) specified in the license no. 4/BPMD & PPT/BPLB3/XI/2013. Estate
Mill and Estate
Empty agrochemical containers from Estate activities were cleaned using a triple rinse method. Empty agrochemical cans and bottles were disposed to landfill and separated from organic and inorganic wastes. Empty agrochemical jerry cans were reused for chemical solution during spraying. Fertiliser sacks were cleaned prior to be reused for lose fruit layer during harvesting in order to avoid contamination of fruits with fertilizers. Estate has been completed with area to clean agrochemical containers and fertiliser sacks. Liquid waste from cleaning was reused for agrochemical dilution during spraying or gardening. The hazardous wastes balance was made for each type of hazardous waste: waste oil, waste battery, used fuel and oil filters, and medical waste. Quantity of empty agrochemical cans and bottles disposed was recorded.
Compliant
Compliant
The waste management and disposal plan should include measures for:
5.4
Audit Findings
Identifying and monitoring sources of waste and pollution. Improving the efficiency of resource utilisation and recycling potential wastes as nutrients or converting them into value added products (e.g. through animal feeding programmes). Appropriate disposal of hazardous chemicals and their containers. Surplus of chemicals container should be disposed of or cleaned in an environmentally and socially responsible way (e.g. returned to the vendor or cleaned using a triple rinse method), such that there is no risk of contamination of water sources or to human health. The disposal instruction on manufacture’s label should be adhered to.
Efficiency of energy use and use of renewable energy is maximised. Are there records of monitoring renewable Result of energy use and its efficiency analysis?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Mill
Fibre and shell were used as boiler feed. Volume of fibre and shell used for boiler feed was estimated
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 75 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
(energy/ton CPO, or energy/ton palm product)
5.4.2 minor
Guidance
5.5 5.5.1 major
Are there records of monitoring of fossil fuels use for operational reason and its efficiency analysis?
Department in Charge
monitoring of renewable energy use and its efficiency
Mill Unit Report (LUP)
Estate Unit Report (LUK)
Audit Findings
Status
monthly. Record sighted for 2012 and 2013. Total energy generated by steam turbine generator for Peranap Mill was recorded monthly and evaluated yearly as total energy (GJ) per ton of CPO produced. Total energy per ton CPO produced was increased in 2013 compared with 2012 due FFB processed in 2013 less than 2012. Mill and Estate
Fossil fuel used for Mill and Estate activities were recorded. Fossil fuel was used for heavy equipment, diesel generator and FFB transportation. In 2013 fossil fuel use was decreased compared to budget. And fossil fuel budget in 2014 less than budget in 2013.
Compliant
Growers and mills should assess the direct energy use of their operations, including fuel and electricity, and energy efficiency of their operations. This should include estimation of fuel use by contractors, including all transport and machinery operations. The feasibility of collecting and using biogas should be studied if possible.
Use of fire for waste disposal and for preparing land for replanting is avoided except in specific situations, as identified in the ASEAN guidelines or other regional best practice. Is there any documented assessment Replanting plan will be begun in 2018. Compliant - Replanting Plan - Estate where fire has been used for preparing Year 2018 – 2023 Office & It was noted that Peranap estate has not conducted land for replanting? PT. Rigunas Agri Head of replanting activities since its first plant in 1992, as Utama administrati defined within the procedure that the replanting are on – KTU & - Procedure within 25 years since its first plant year. Researches replanting (AAHowever it was described within the replanting Department APM-OP-1100.20procedure (AA-APM-OP-1100.20-R1) that the R1) - Estate organisation committed to zero burning by using Manager “chipping technique” at the ganoderma risks plantation by conducting topple to the palm trees, chopping and stacking using excavator by bucket modification. Procedure replanting mentioned that Field Assistant, Assistant Chief and Estate Manager must perform
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 76 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
checks to ensure that the contractor does not perform burning for land preparation for replanting. All the replanting activities requires to be documented and monitored, such as: Schedule of replanting (chipping, digging and planting), progress planting LCC (Legume Cover Crop) and Minutes Works replanting (Progress in the Works Contractor) In the procedure of replanting mentioned that, the methods used are:
Toppling trees (excavators)
Chipping: cutting palm trunk, so as not infected with ganoderma
Planting LCC / legumes (Mucuna and Puereria javanica etc. So that the decay of the old oil palm trunks can be faster
Planting of oil palm.
using
heavy
equipment
This method has been used in replanting the whole plantation belonging to Asian Agri group including PT. Rigunas Agri Utama. 5.5.2 major
Are there records of implementation of zero burning policy?
- Procedure of Replanting (OP1100.20-R1). & Procedure of Land Preparation (OP1100.20-R1) - Company Policy dated 26 Nov 2012
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
- Estate Office & Head of administrati on – KTU & Researches Department - Estate employees
The organisation has policy of zero burning documented in procedure of land preparation: AAAPM-OP-1100.02-R1 (Land Preparation) and OP1100.20-R1 (Replanting).
Compliant
The organisation had documented company policy th dated 26 November 2012 that defined to conduct zero burning practices actively to support initiative of preventive and monitoring of fire and smokes.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 77 of 118
Audit Report
Ref. 5.5.3 major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS Are there procedure and records of emergency responses to land burning (tanggap darurat kebakaran lahan)?
Reference Procedure for Fire handling & prevention at mill, offices and housing area (AA-KL-15EFP)
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
OHS Officer & ERT member
Several documented procedures related to emergency response to land burning such as: Estate emergency response procedure (KL-14-EFP) were available Fire drill simulation was conducted at Peranap nd estate on November 22 2013 at warehouse and workshop with scenario of fire incidents at estate land near to workshop area. The records of both drill evaluation review were sighted.
Compliant
OHS Officer
The infrastructure and equipment regarding to fire control and prevention were provided and properly functioned such as:
Compliant
Estate emergency response procedure (KL-14-EFP) 5.5.1 minor
Are appropriate fire extinguishers and facilities, depending on the risks assessment, available?
List of emergency tools Emergency kit inspection records (Monthly)
Peranap estate: 1 unit Ambulance, 17 units fire extinguisher deployed at several risk locations such as offices, housings, Workshop & warehouse, also first aid boxes and bags that kept by each supervisors (mandor); 1 unit water mobile tank capacity 1000 litres that supported with 1 unit “robin” pump. Peranap mill: Fire extinguisher (11 spots with DCP and CO2 medium at electrical area), 4 spots hydrant box, hydrant pumps pressurized 4 bars and 8 units of first aid boxes.
Guidance
5.6 5.6.1 major
Fire should be used only where an assessment has demonstrated that it is the most effective and least environmentally damaging option for minimising the risk of severe pest and disease outbreaks, and with evidence that fire-use is carefully controlled. Use of fire on peat soils should be prohibited.
Plans to reduce pollution and emissions, including greenhouse gasses, are developed, implemented and monitored. Is there evidence of identification of Identification of pollution and emission sources at Mill and Result of emission sources at mills? Peranap Mill activities was evident. The source of Estate evaluation of pollution, type of pollution and its control were environmental documented, e.g boiler, POME, diesel electric
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 78 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
aspect and impact 5.6.2 major
Is monitoring of emission quality of the sources identified?
Report of analysis for boiler emission, generator emission, ambient air, noise
Mill and Estate
5.6.1 minor
Are there records of efforts and strategies employed to reduce pollution and emissions?
Environmental management objectives, targets and programs
Mill and Estate
5.6.2 minor
Are there records of identification, monitoring, and treatment methodology for POME?
Procedure AAMPM-OP14000.13-R1 – WWTP Process
Mill
Certificate of analysis
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Audit Findings generator, vehicle and heavy equipment emission. Monitoring of pollution and emission quality of identified sources has been programmed. Monitoring and measurement results for second semester of 2013 were sighted for boiler emission against Environment Ministry Decree #07/2007, diesel electricity generator against Environment Ministry Decree #Per21/Menlh/2008, vehicle and heavy equipment emission against Environment Ministry Decree #05/2006, odour emission against Environment Ministry Decree #50/Menlh/11/96, ambient noise against Environment Ministry Decree #48/Menlh/11/96, also ambient air quality against Government Regulation #41/1999. Efforts and strategies employed to reduce pollution and emissions were sighted, e.g.: Substitute diesel fuel to fibre and shell to operate boiler Conduct preventive maintenance regularly based on working hour of electricity generator Define target of fuel consumption for each dump truck to transport FFB Not operate turbine while Mill was not operated Install dust collector to control boiler ash Grow fruit plants in each employee house Manuring application based on recommendation. POME was processed in 4 ponds: cooling pond (pond #1), acidification (pond #2 and #3) and primary anaerobic (pond #4). POME from pond #4 was applied in the Peranap Estate according to permit of land application from the head of BLHD (Regional Environmental Agency) Indragiri Hulu No. nd 33/2012 dated October 22 2012 and valid through
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Status
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
Page 79 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Reference
Permit of land application from the head of BLHD (Regional Environmental Agency) Indragiri Hulu No. 33/2012 dated 22 October 2012 and valid through 5 years
Report of Land Application period July – December 2013
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
5 years. POME was monitored by Peranap Mill laboratory for parameter pH and debit and external laboratory for parameter required by permit of land application (pH, BOD, COD, Cu, Pb, Cd, Zn, oil and grease). The result of POME monitoring was reviewed including measurement of BOD for period July – December 2013. The Ministry of Environment Decree #29/2003 and permit of land application required that BOD of POME flowed to land application is less than 5,000 mg/litre. The result of POME quality during this period was under 5,000 mg/litre. Water quality was monitored at land application well and non-land application well. The result of monitoring well was reviewed according to The Ministry of Health Decree #416/1990. Report of land application is reported to Environmental Agency of Indragiri Hulu Regency, Environment Agency of Riau Province, Central of Management Ecoregion Sumatera and Ministerial Office of Environment.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 80 of 118
Audit Report
PRINCIPLES 6: RESPONSIBLE CONSIDERATION OF EMPLOYEES AND INDIVIDUALS AND COMMUNITIES AFFECTED BY GROWERS AND MILLS Ref. 6.1 6.1.1
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Aspects of plantation and mill management including replanting that have social impacts are identified in a participatory way, and plans to mitigate the negative impacts and promote the positive ones are made, implemented and monitored, to demonstrate continuous improvement. Is there any documented environmental and social impact assessment, including details of positive and negative social effect that may be caused by plantations and mills, and documented participation of affected parties and local communities?
AMDAL document
KTU, HSE
Social impact assessment result was documented in AMDAL document (released in 2003). The AMDAL studies including pre operation and operation phase of estate and mill.
Compliant
In line with AMDAL legal requirements, the studies involved participation of affected parties and local communities. It was reviewed that social component covered is in line with the minimum guidance of AMDAL coverage including working opportunities, incomes, local perception, public health, and social conflict.
6.1.1 minor
Are there any regular monitoring and management of social impact, with the participation of local communities?
RKL/RPL progress report
KTU, HSE
Monitoring of RKL/RPL has been performed annually. The last monitoring report was created in 2013 and indicated that the company has opened working opportunities for local recruitment, implementing CSR, etc.
Compliant
6.1.2 minor
Are there results of revision to the environmental management document that encompasses social impact assessment in the event there are changes to company’s operational scope, in accordance with existing regulations?
N/A
Estate and Mill
There were no changes to company’s operational scope.
Not Applicable
6.1.3 minor
Are there any regular and scheduled environmental management and monitoring report?
Report of RKL st RPL 1 semester 2013
Mill and Estate
Compliant
Receipt note of
Implementation of RKL RPL was reported every six months. The reports were submitted to Riau Province and Indragiri Hulu Regency Environmental Agency, Central of Environmental Management
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 81 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
RKL RPL submission 6.1.4 minor
Guidance
Are there any particular attention paid to the impacts of outgrower schemes (does the plantation include such a scheme)
Audit Findings Regional Sumatera Environment.
AMDAL document
Report of RKL st RPL 1 semester 2013
Mill and Estate
and
Ministerial
Status Office
of
Particular attention was paid to the impact of out grower schemes (plasma). The organization has management and monitoring plan prepared with the participation of local communities and relevant stakeholders.
Compliant
The identification of social impacts can use AMDAL as a part of the process but it is the responsibility of the company to provide sufficient objective evidence to the audit team that the full requirements of an SEIA are met for all aspects of plantation and mill operations, and captures all changes over time. Identification of social impacts should be carried out by the grower with the participation of the affected parties as appropriate to the situation. The involvement of independent experts should be sought where this is considered necessary to ensure that all impacts (both positive and negative) are identified. Potential social impacts may results from activities such as: building new roads, processing mills or other infrastructure; replanting with different crops or expansion of planting area; disposal of mill effluents; clearing of remaining natural vegetation; changes in employee numbers or employment terms. Plantation and mill management may have social impacts (positive or negative) on factors such as:
Access and use rights Economic livelihoods (e.g. paid employment) and working conditions. Subsistence activities. Cultural and religious values. Health and education facilities.
Other community values, resulting from changes such as improved transport/communication or arrival of substantial migrant labour force.
6.2 6.2.1 major
There are open and transparent methods for communication and consultation between growers and/or millers, local communities and other affected or interested parties. Is there any documented procedure and KTU Compliant SOP AA-GLA procedure has been documented to describe this records of communication and consultation mechanism. The procedure was titled “Mekanisme 5009.1.R0 with the communities? Komunikasi/konsultasi Masyarakat lokal atau Sustainability kelompok lain yang terkena dampak atau Awareness records kepentingan dengan pihak kebun/pabrik” (Public (attendance list & consultation for stakeholders). minutes) for employees and Sustainability requirements have been stakeholders. communicated to stakeholders in recorded briefing form such as : RSPO procedure awareness to
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 82 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
employees (March & November 2013), environmental & safety policy to subcontractors (January 2013) 6.2.1 minor
Is a list of stakeholders maintained?
List of stakeholders
KTU
List of stakeholder was available comprises of society leaders, local authorities (forestry, labour, environmental) and also NGOs.
Minor NCR 2014-08 (Closed)
Minor Non-conformities : The stakeholder list does not contain any local farmers as outside supplier 6.2.2 minor
6.2.3 minor
Guidance
Are there records of local communities’ aspiration and responses or follow up actions by companies to these requirements?
Is there a dedicated person responsible for consulting and communicating with local communities?
Aspiration & response letters
KTU
In line with AMDAL requirements, studies of AMDAL include participation of local communities, including identification of their aspiration.
Compliant
The local communities have expressed their aspiration about support of their children education. Records reviewed shown that the organisation has response these aspiration e.g. PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, response letter for job apprenticeship request from Vocational school SMKN 1 Pasir Penyu (October 2013).
Estate Manager Assignment Letter No.001/ESTMGR/KPN/I/2014
Job profile
KTU
“KTU” is temporarily assigned to perform public consultation due to absence of “Humas” (public relation) position.
Compliant
Decision that the growers or mills are planning to make should be made clear, so that local communities and other interested parties understand the purpose of the communication and/or consultation. Communication and consultation mechanism should be designated in collaboration with local communities and other affected or interested parties. These should consider the use of existing local mechanism and languages. Consideration should be given to the existence/formation of a multi-stakeholder forum. Communication should take into account differential access to information of women as compared to men, village leaders as compared to day labourers, new versus established community groups, and different ethnic groups.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 83 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Consideration should be given to involving third parties, such as disinterested community groups, NGSs, government (or a combination of these) to facilitate smallholder schemes and communities, and others as appropriate, in these communications.
6.3 6.3.1 major
6.3.1 minor
There is a mutually agreed and documented system for dealing with complaints and grievances, which is implemented and accepted by all parties Is there an open mechanism, which is SOP AA-HR-308.5-R0 KTU Compliant This mechanism has been described in 2 accepted by affected parties, to receive procedures “Penyampaian & penyelesaian keluhan SOP AA-GL-5005.1complaints and resolve dispute in an karyawan” (grievance/ complaint SOP AA-HR-308.5R0 effective, timely and appropriate manner? R0), “Penanganan Keluhan pencemaran lingkungan” SOP AA-GL-5009.1(environmental issues handling, SOP AA-GLR0 5005.1-R0 ), “Mekanisme komunikasi/konsultasi masyarakat lokal atau kelompok lain yang terkena AA-GL-5003.1-R1 dampak atau kepentingan dengan pihak kebun/pabrik” (public consultation to stakeholders, SOP AA-GL-5009.1-R0), “Penanganan konflik lahan” (land conflict handling, AA-GL-5003.1-R1). Are there records of handling of the KTU Compliant Form of complaints, Complaints were recorded in a feedback form and complaints? feedback register registered in a logbook where most of complaints were from employees related to their housing and facilities condition. Action was also immediately taken to resolve facilities issues. No serious social issues that affect organisation’s operation to be identified during the audit.
6.3.2 minor
Guidance
Are there procedures for identification and calculation of fair compensation for the loss of legal or customary right of the land, with the involvement of local community representatives and relevant agencies and made publicly available?
SOP AA-GL-5003.1R1
HUMAS/KTU & Legal
Calculation and compensation method for land has been described in a procedure. This mechanism was explicitly defined in the same procedure of “land conflict handling”. This procedure has been notified to stakeholders even though there were no possible land acquisition at current time.
Compliant
Dispute resolution mechanism should be established through open and consensual agreements with relevant affected parties. Complaints may be dealt with by mechanism such as Joint Consultative Committee (JCC). Grievance may be internal (employees) or external.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 84 of 118
Audit Report
Ref. 6.4 6.4.1 major
6.4.1 minor
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Status
Any negotiations concerning compensation for loss of legal or customary rights are dealt with through a documented system that enables indigenous people, local communities and other stakeholders to express their view through their own representative institutions. Are there procedures for the identification, KTU & Legal Compliant SOP AA-GL-5003.1This procedure was embedded in land conflict calculation and compensation for the loss R1 procedure where identification and calculation of legal or customary rights of the land, with method were also described. the involvement of local community representatives and relevant agencies? Are there records of identification of people Legal Compliant Agreement letter, Name of land owner who is eligible to receive entitled to receive compensation? minutes of land compensation for land acquisition was already noted compensation
6.4.2 minor
Are there records of negotiations processes and/or the details of compensation settlements?
Agreement letter
Legal
6.4.3 minor
Are there records of the implementation of compensation payment?
Payment notes
Legal
Guidance
Audit Findings
FFB supplier interview
in “Surat Persetujuan Bersama” and “Berita Acara Ganti Rugi” (for each of them). Result of Negotiation process has been documented in “Surat Persetujuan Bersama” that comprised information of land square, land position, compensation rate, etc. example: land in Semelinang Tebing, the acquisition was taken during November 1994. Records of payment were documented in “kwitansi” (cash payment note). Based on interview with FFB suppliers it was confirmed that the payment was made on time.
Compliant
Compliant
This criterion should be considered in conjunction with Criterion 2.3. and the associated guidance. Local communities have right to appoint their own representatives and this processes and results must be documented.
6.5 6.5.1 major
Pay and condition for employees and for employees of contractors always meet at least legal or industry minimum standards and are sufficient to provide decent living wages. Is there any documentation of employees’ Monthly payroll KTU Compliant Monthly payroll was generated comprises basic pay rates? wage, overtime hours, piecework, working days, accident/death insurance deduction, etc. the basic wage was observed in compliance with minimum wage as defined in Governor Decree “SK Gubernur Riau no.67/2012” with minimum amount of
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 85 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
1,548,888 IDR. The company paid higher than minimum to PHL workers which are 1,626,000 IDR/ month or 65,040 IDR/day while SKU worker have 1,509,000 (according to current GAPKI decree letter no.144/GAPKI/R/III/2013). The SKU worker have rice “natura” 15 kg for the employee, 9 kg for the spouse and 7.5 kg for up to 3 children which equals to 117,000 IDR amount. 6.5.2 major
Are there any company working regulations and work contracts, in accordance with existing regulations?
Perjanjian Kerja Bersama PKB (working agreement)
KTU
Working agreement (PKB) was established and endorsed by local authorities (labour department) and last for 2 years. This PKB was applied to nonstaff employees (SKU) while PHL (daily free workers) used individual contract agreement.
Compliant
6.5.1 minor
Do growers and millers provide adequate housing, water supplies, medical, educational, and other facilities for employees where such facilities are not available or accessible?
Water test certificates
KTU & HUMAS
The company has provided employees facilities such as : housing, sport fields, building for prayers (mosques & churches), schools (kindergarten & elementary school), childcare house, polyclinics, free electricity and clean water supply (from reservoir and deep-wells). The water quality was periodically checked by external lab (UPT Pengujian Dinas Pekerjaan Umum). The last water inspection for th deep wells was performed in July 25 2013 at Afdeling I, II, III and IV. The result indicated that water was safe enough for consumption.
Compliant
6.5.2 minor
Are agreements entered into with contractors to specify that contractors abide by labour laws?
Contract agreements
KTU
Contract agreements for contractors were available, defined clear rights and authorities between two parties. Currently, 2 contractors being used by the company for the provision of school bus and heavy equipment lease. The contract has stated that contractor shall abide the current labour and safety law.
Compliant
Guidance
Where temporary or migrant workers are employed, a special labour policy should be established. This labour policy should state the non-discriminatory practices; no contract substitution; post
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 86 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
arrival orientation program to focus especially on language, safety, labour laws, cultural practice, etc; decent living condition to be provided. Migrant workers are legalised, and a separate employment should be drawn up to meet immigration requirements for foreign workers, and international standards. Deductions do not jeopardies a decent living wage.
6.6
6.6.1 major
The employer respects the right of all personnel to form and join trade unions of their choice and to bargain collectively. Where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law, the employer facilitates parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining for all such personnel. Is there a documented company policy Compliant Company policy letter, KTU, union The company has recognized freedom of recognising freedom of association? PKB (working representative association as committed and written in company th
agreement)
policy dated November 26 2012 and PKB (working agreement) clause 2. The union name was registered as “PUK Serikat Pekerja Pertanian dan Perkebunan Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia PT. Riguna Agri Utama” which th was founded in October 11 2012 (registration no. Kep 036/PC-FSPPP-SPSI/K/10/2012).
6.6.1 minor
Are there any documented minutes of meeting with any labour union (if any)?
Minutes of meeting
KTU, union representative
Some minutes of meeting between union representative and management were available to discuss some agendas, e.g. festival for national celebration day, fringe benefit for “hari raya”, etc. No significant issues that affect organisation’s operation to be reported in the minutes.
Compliant
Guidance
The right of employees and contractors to form associations and bargain collectively with their employer should be respected, in accordance with Convention 87 and 98 of the International Labour Organisation. Labour laws and union agreements or in their absence, direct contracts of employment detailing payments and other condition are available in the languages that understood by the workers or explained carefully to them by a management official.
6.7
Children are not employed or exploited. Work by children is acceptable on family farms, under adult supervision, and when not interfering with education programmes. Children are not exposed to hazardous working conditions. Is there any documented company policy Company policy letter KTU Compliant The company has prohibited child workers (under 18 on worker age requirements, in accordance years) as committed and written in company policy th to national laws? dated November 26 2012 in accordance with
6.7.1 major
Indonesian law UU 13/2003. 6.7.1
Are there any records of implementation of
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
List of workers,
KTU
List of workers did not show any worker under 18
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 87 of 118
Audit Report
Ref. minor
Guidance
CRITERION AND INDICATORS company policy on worker age requirements?
Reference
Department in Charge
employee ID cards
Audit Findings
Status
years old when they joined the company. Some copies of worker’s ID were also filled as evidence. No underage worker was met during the audit. Workers interviewed indicated no worker under 18 years old.
Workers interview
Growers and millers should clearly define minimum working age, together with working hours under national regulations. Smallholders and family farm should allow work by children only if permitted by national regulations.
6.8
major
Any form of discrimination based on race, caste, national origin, religion, disability, gender, sexual orientation, union membership, political affiliation, or age, is prohibited. Is there any documented equal Company policy letter KTU Compliant The company encourage equal working opportunities policy? opportunities without discrimination as committed
6.8.1 minor
Is there any evidence of equal treatment in working opportunities for workers?
6.8.1
Guidance
6.9 6.9.1 major
th
and written in company policy dated November 26 2012. The policy has been communicated to workers. Recruitment files, list of workers
KTU
Compliant
Recruitment data and list of worker notifies that workers are from different race, religion, sexual orientation, etc. and treated equally. During worker interview, no discrimination issues expressed.
The grievance procedures detailed in 6.3 apply. Positive discrimination to provide employment and benefits to specific communities is acceptable as part of negotiated agreements.
A policy to prevent sexual harassment and all other forms of violence against women and to protect their reproductive rights is developed and applied. Is there a documented company policy on Company policy letter Compliant KTU, Gender The company has prohibited sexual harassment and sexual harassment and violence? committee violence as committed and written in company th
policy dated November 26 2012. 6.9.2 major
Is there a documented company policy on the protection of reproductive rights?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Company policy letter
KTU, Gender committee
The company gave protection of reproductive rights for female workers as committed and written in th company policy dated November 26 2012.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 88 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
6.9.1 minor
Is there any proof of implementation of sexual harassment policy?
Interview with gender committee and female workers
Gender committee
No sexual harassment reported from gender committee and female workers during interview session both in mill and plantation.
Compliant
6.9.2 minor
Is there a proof of implementation of reproductive rights policy?
Monthly pregnancy test report, minutes of gender policy awareness
Gender committee
Pregnancy test was held monthly to all female workers doing agrochemical works. The gender committee has also performed monthly meeting with members to identify any issue including gender awareness as necessary. Minutes of meeting was also documented monthly. The members consist of 44 female workers.
Compliant
6.9.3 minor
Is specific grievance mechanism available?
SOP AA-HR-309.01R0
Gender committee
Documented procedure has been established to describe handling mechanism of sexual harassment case. No grievance was identified so far since this committee established in 21/10/2012.
Compliant
Guidance
There should be a clear policy developed in consultation with employees, contractors, and other relevant stakeholders, and the policy should be publicly available. Progress in implementing the policy should be regularly monitored, and the results of monitoring activities should be recorded. A gender committee specifically to address areas of concern to women may be requested to comply with the criteria. This committee, to have representatives from all areas of work, will consider matters such as; trainings on women’s rights, counselling for women affected by violence, child care facilities to be provided by the growers and millers, women to be allowed to breastfeed up to nine months before resuming chemical spraying or usage tasks, and women to be given specific break times to enable effective breastfeeding.
6.10 6.10.1 major
Growers and mills deal fairly and transparently with smallholders and other local business. Are lists of current and past prices paid for Mill There were seven out growers supplied FFB to Price Information FFB publicly available? Peranap Mill (ES, MN, MHS, SM, ND, BRD and Tio). date 17 January FFB pricing was available and informed to the 2014 (Rp. 1.770) supplier through sign board at the loading ramp and Minutes of FFB updated every day. pricing team, Riau The pricing components considered the province transportation cost, grading and oil potential content.
Compliant
Current and past prices for smallholders were available as stated in weekly minutes “Berita acara hasil rapat tim penetapan harga pembelian TBS
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 89 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
6.10.2 major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Are pricing mechanism for FFB and inputs/services documented (where these are under control of the mill or plantation)
Reference
Price Mechanism 2013
Riau Governor decree no.22/2006
Department in Charge
Mill
Audit Findings kelapa sawit provinsi Riau produksi pekebun di provinsi Riau”, endorsed by the team leader every week. The meeting was held in local forest authority (Disbun). The price is applicable and updated for 1 week period. E.g. FFB price letter no.03/TPH TBSI/2014 (period applies on 22-28 January 2014). Price mechanism of FFB was determined by RO Pekanbaru and described in Price Mechanism by th FFB Manager dated March 14 2013. The company updated the information on the FFB pricing formula based on global CPO based price that includes details of transport, grading, potential oil content, milling and shipping costs.
Status
Compliant
Method of FFB pricing (for smallholders) was outlined in Governor Decree “Peraturan Gubernur Riau no.22/ 2006”. The price made based on several variables such as: plantation age, ”K” index, CPO price, R-CPO, kernel price/IS, R-IS.
6.10.1 minor
6.10.2 minor Guidance
Is the evidence available that all parties understand the contractual agreements they enter into, and that contracts are fair, legal and transparent?
Contractual agreement
Interview with FFB suppliers
Are agreed payment made in timely manner?
Payment records
Mill
Mill
FFB was purchased from outside grower, the price mechanism followed “memorandum no.0001/MMFFB/Memo/I/2014” issued by FFB manager. The selection and evaluation of supplier were based on capability of supplier to supply required inputs and services. Specification of inputs and or services required was communicated to the supplier/vendor through tender document or request for quotation. The selection was conducted by Regional Office. Interview with FFB suppliers indicated that the agreements are fair, legal and transparent. The record showed that payment was conducted in line with term of payment agreed within the contract.
Compliant
Compliant
Transaction with smallholders should consider issues such as the role of middle men, transport and storage of FFB, quality and grading. The need to recycle the nutrient in FFB (under 4.2) should
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 90 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
also be considered; where it is not practicable to recycle wastes to smallholders, compensation for the value of the nutrients exported might be made via the FFB price. Smallholders must have access to the grievance procedure under criterion 6.3, if they consider that they are not receiving a fair price for FFB, whether or not middle men are involved. The need for a fair and transparent pricing mechanism is particularly important for out growers, who are contractually obliged to sell all FFB to a particular mill. If mills require smallholders to change practices to meet the RSPO criteria, consideration must be given to the costs of such changes, and the possibility of advance payment for FFB could be considered.
6.11 6.11.1 minor
Growers and millers contribute to local sustainable development wherever appropriate. Are there records of company contributions KTU/HUMAS CSR plan, CSR to the local developments? records
The company has developed CSR programme in 2013 (300 million IDR budget) comprised of several activities such as provision of prayer buildings and schools, funding for cultural and religious events, cattle provision, making of deep-wells, sports tournaments, provide health facility (ambulance), school, etc. School, prayer buildings, sport facility, and ambulance are available for public. The company has also used local contractor to provide school buses and heavy equipment lease. The company has also cooperated with plasma smallholders to develop local economics. CSR records were sighted as follow: building material supply for church in Punti Kayu village (October 2013), provision of grader equipment to excavate land for local health centre establishment (May 2012), medical equipment supplies to local health centres in Pematang Banteng village (November 2013), training provision to teachers by Tanoto foundation (October 2013).
Compliant
CSR plan for year 2014 was also established with budget amount : 340 million IDR to provide : fishery farming, entrepreneurship trainings, deep wells for clean water, general medical service, baby day care, mosque & churches renovation, etc. Guidance
Contributions to local development should be based on the results of consultation with local communities. See also criterion 6.2. Such consultation should be based on the principles of transparency, openness and participation, and should encourage communities to identify their own priorities and needs, including the different
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 91 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
needs of men and women. Where candidates for employment are of equal merit, preference should always be given to members of local communities. Positive discrimination should be recognised as conflicting with criterion 6.8
PRINCIPLES 7: RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PLANTINGS All land inside the concession area has been developed in the period of 1987 – 1989, therefore Principles 7 is not applicable.
PRINCIPLES 8: COMMITMENT TO CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT IN KEY AREAS OF ACTIVITY Ref. 8.1 8.1.1 major
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Status
Growers and miller regularly monitor and review their activities and develop and implement action plans that allow demonstrable continuous improvement in key operations Is there a monitoring action plan based on Evidence of several improvements was shown, e.g. Report of external Compliant Mill and o Reduction in use of certain chemicals: the social environmental impact audit Estate assessment (AMDAL), and regular o The organisation committed that Paraquat OHS objectives, evaluations of plantation and mill only used for specific species: a few targets and species of ferns, such as: Stenochlaena operations? programs and Lycopodiophyta. As a minimum these must include, but not Environmental o Environmental impacts: necessarily be limited to: Management o Segregation of domestic water run off with Reduction in use of certain Program industrial waste water by building trench chemicals (criterion 4.6) around shell storage area to prevent Environmental impacts (criterion contaminated water to open drainage 5.6) o Improvement in monitoring of fuel Waste reduction (criterion 5.3) consumption by calibrating fuel injection Pollution and emissions (criterion pumps and check fuel nozzle pipe. 5.6) o Improvement in monitoring of domestic
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 92 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Reference
Department in Charge
Audit Findings
Social impacts (6.1) o
o
o
Status
water consumption by installing flow meter to monitor water consumption in housing Waste reduction: o Reduction in discharged waste water. The project including: Injection of water from hydro cyclone and blow down boiler to boiler chimney. It can prevent blow down boiler drain to water body, reduce waste water treated in WWTP. Pollution and emissions: o Reduction of potential particulate release to the atmosphere by increase boiler ash capture by the chimney Social impacts o Projects to improve social impacts are integrated within CSR program
Regular evaluation of plantation and mill operation was performed through internal and external audits. The coverage of the audit including production planning, production, power generation and utilization, consumable, process control, quality control – including waste water treatment, maintenance, occupational health and safety, FFB incoming and inspection, and laboratory. The above audit reports indicated that all gaps against standard operation procedure of plantation and operation were noted. Corrective action plan was issued and implemented to demonstrate effort for compliance as well as continual improvement. A monitoring action plan has been established after AMDAL/social impact assessment and annual
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 93 of 118
Audit Report
Ref.
8.1.1 minor
Guidance
CRITERION AND INDICATORS
Are there any records of follow-up actions taken against RSPO audit findings, if any?
Reference
Internal Audit Report 2013
Department in Charge
Environmental and Sustainable Department
Audit Findings evaluation was also done to monitor result and progress of action. Most of the plans were executed and the result found was as expected (CSR, local recruitment, etc). Internal audit programme was conducted by integrating with ISPO (Indonesian Sustainable Palm oil Organisation) and RSPO. Last internal audit was conducted within the period of October 2013. Mr. Winengku Pamartajati as internal auditor was certified as auditor ISPO & RSPO. Internal audit findings were followed up with corrective and preventive actions.
Status
Compliant
Growers should have a system to improve practices in line with new information and techniques and a mechanism for disseminating this information throughout the workforce.
3.3.2 Mill Supply Chain Requirements
The FFB source is one (1) organisation owned by PT. Rigunas Agri Utama, plasma estate managed by PT Rigunas Agri Utama and third party estates. Plasma estate and third party estate are excluded from certification. All FFB are processed together, both from the Peranap Estate, Peranap Plasma Estate and third party estates. Therefore the Model selected is Mass Balance and RSPO Supply Chain Module E was used as audit criteria. The detail of FFB processed in Peranap Mill is described in Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 presented in this report.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 94 of 118
Audit Report
3.3.2.1 Supply Chain Certification Standard
AUDIT FINDINGS / OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE
STATUS (NC/AoC/ Compliant)
This is initial certification audit; therefore no physical handle of RSPO certified sustainable oil palm products yet. No products can be claimed as RSPO certified products.
Compliant
Supply Chain Certification Standard Supply chain actors who take legal ownership and physically handle RSPO Certified Sustainable oil palm products before and up to the (final) refinery need to register their transaction in the RSPO IT System upon the moment of physical shipment. Note: at present, it is not yet possible to enter palm kernel product transaction into the RSPO IT System. Therefore, until further notice, the reporting of trades into a central database will not be required. Trade will be monitored by RSPO accredited certification bodies as part of supply chain certification audits that also cover the palm kernel product supply chain.
The audit was focused on the facility readiness to physically handle RSPO Certified Sustainable oil palm products, e.g. availability of procedure. The organisation has not registered to RSPO eTrace yet. When the Mill RSPO certification is granted, they will register themselves before transaction of RSPO certified oil palm products start.
Actor who must register include: Palm oil mills producing RSPO certified palm oil and palm kernel oil Refineries (the final refinery that does not further delivery to other refineries directly or indirectly via traders – only needs to confirm the receipt of shipments; it does not need to do sales announcements) 1. Documented procedures 1.1
The facilities shall have written procedures and/or work instructions to ensure the implementation of all the elements specified in these requirements. This shall include at minimum the following:
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
There were documented procedures available on site to ensure the implementation of RSPO SCC requirements.
Compliant
AA-MPM-OP-1400.17-R3 (SOP Traceability) Revision 3, st dated October 1 2013. The procedure was established to ensure the production of sustainable and non-sustainable CPO/PK/CPKO produced by the Mill and shipped out can be traced to the suppliers of raw material, and also to ensure
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 95 of 118
Audit Report
Supply Chain Certification Standard AUDIT FINDINGS / OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE
STATUS (NC/AoC/ Compliant)
the palm oil production process can be described.
AA-MPM-OP-1400.18-R3 (SOP Mass Balance) Revision 3, st Dated October 1 2013. The procedure described mechanism to monitor the supply chain of certified CPO, PK and CPK production are sustainable, from receipt of raw materials to the delivery of mill products (POM/KCP) and to ensure the record of number of "sustainable" and "nonsustainable" CPO, PK and CPKO production generated by POM/KCP and shipped out from the mill were "balance" in each 3-months period.
a. Complete and up to date procedures covering the implementation of all the elements in these requirements
The procedures were up to date covering all the element of RSPO SCC requirement, including purchasing and goods in, recording and mass balancing, and sales goods out. The implementation was appropriate with existing procedure.
b. The name of the person having overall responsibility for and authority over the implementation of these requirements and compliance with all applicable requirements. This person shall be able to demonstrate awareness of the facilities procedures for the implementation of this standard.
Currently, personnel having overall responsibility were KTU (Mr. Bahrum Ray Roygers Purba) and Factory Manager (Mr. Sariaman Simanjuntak). The personnel have awareness and knowledge for the implementation the RSPO SCC standard since they already have st been trained on October 31 2013.
1.2.
The facility shall have documented procedures for receiving and processing certified and uncertified FFBs.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
There was a documented procedure for receiving and processing certified and uncertified FFB, including the grading up to CPO and Kernel dispatch, described within the procedure: - AA-MPM-OP-1400.17-R3 (SOP Traceability) Revision 3, dated st October 1 2013. - AA-MPM-OP-1400.18-R3 (SOP Mass Balance) Revision 3, st - Dated October 1 2013. - AA-MPM-OP-1400.02-R2 FFB Receiver Procedure - AA-MPM-OP-1400.03-R1 Sterilizer station Procedure
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
Page 96 of 118
Audit Report
Supply Chain Certification Standard AUDIT FINDINGS / OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE -
STATUS (NC/AoC/ Compliant)
AA-MPM-OP-1400.06-R1 Clarifier station Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.08-R1 Kernel station Procedure AA-MPM-OP-1400.14-R2 Storage and delivery Procedure
The organisation has separated recording volume of receive certified and non-certified FFB. All FFB from Peranap estate will be rd considered as certified FFB, while the other supply base: 3 party and Peranap smallholder will be considered as non-certified FFB. Based on the received volume of certified and non-certified FFB the organisation will calculate the processed and output of CSPO and CSPK. 2. Purchasing and goods in 2.1.
2.2.
The facility shall verify and document the volumes of certified and non-certified FFBs.
Peranap Mill has a clear system for recording FFB received from certified supply base and non-certified supply base. It was verified that receiving of FFB was traceable to the supply base unit. Weighing slip and receiving report issued clearly stated weight of FFB received th and its source. Weighbridge has been calibrated on October 7 2013 by UPT Metrologi Disperindag Riau Province based on calibration letter no. 510.302/METRO/5363/X/2013 and 510.302/METRO/5369/X/2013. There were two weighbridges used for FFB and factory product, Avery Weigh Tronix E1205; 104350300 and E1205; 104350260, its maximum capacity was 50,000 kg. A review to the current records (January – December 2013) found that they were well maintained and retrievable.
The facility shall inform SAI Global immediately if there is any projected overproduction.
The procedure of Traceability (AA-MPM-OP-1400.17-R3) concerning the immediately inform Certification Body if there was a projected overproduction. No overproduction identified in 2013.
Compliant
A review to the records and related documentation of the implementation of the SCC found were accurate, complete and up to
Compliant
Compliant
3. Record keeping 3.1.
The facility shall maintain accurate, complete, up-todate and accessible records and reports covering all of
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 97 of 118
Audit Report
Supply Chain Certification Standard AUDIT FINDINGS / OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE these requirements.
date records and report have been maintained by Peranap Mill e.g FFB receiving records; CPO and PK production daily records; monthly recapitulated record of FFB received, and CPO and PK produced.
Retention times for all records and reports shall be at least five (5) years.
The records and reports were easily accessible both in hard copy and soft copy. Retention time for these records and reports has been determined (10 years).
3.3.a. The facility shall record and balance all receipts of RSPO certified FFB and deliveries of RSPO certified CPO, PKO and palm kernel meal on a three-monthly basis.
Balance among all FFB, CPO and PK receipts, produced and delivered was conducted in daily basis and recapitulation was done in three months interval. The records (January – December 2013) were well maintained.
3.3.b. All volumes of palm oil and palm kernel oil that are delivered are deducted from the material accounting system according to conversion rations stated by RSPO.
There were no deliveries of RSPO certified CPO and certified palm kernel since they have been sold under ISCC scheme. The system of delivery that was deducted from the material accounting system according to conversion ratios was available.
3.3.c. The facility can only deliver Mass Balance sales from a positive stock. However, a facility is allowed to sell short.
There were no deliveries of RSPO certified CPO and certified palm kernel since they have been sold under ISCC scheme. The system of delivery only conducted from a positive stock available.
3.4.
The procedure of Traceability (AA-MPM-OP-1400.17-R3) described that product name and Supply Chain model (MB) will be specified in relevant document, e.g. sales note, delivery note, weighbridge card, etc. No physical delivery of RSPO certified CPO and palm kernel yet.
3.2.
3.5.
The following trade names should be used and specified in relevant documents, e.g. *product name*/MB or Mass Balance. The supply chain model used should be clearly indicated. In cases where a mill outsources activities to an independent palm kernel crush, the crush mill fails under the responsibility of the mill and does not need to be separately certified. The mill has to ensure that the crush is covered through a signed and enforceable agreement.
STATUS (NC/AoC/ Compliant)
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant No outsourced activities available.
4. Sales and good out
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 98 of 118
Audit Report
Supply Chain Certification Standard AUDIT FINDINGS / OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE 4.1.
The facility shall ensure that all sales invoices issued for RSPO certified products delivered includes the following information: a) the name and address of the buyer b) the date on which the invoice was issued c) a description of the product, including the applicable supply chain model (Segregated or Mass Balance) d) the quantity of the products delivered e) reference to related transport documentation
The organisation has established relevant documentation, e.g. sales note, delivery note and weighbridge card for RSPO certified products delivery including: the name and address of the buyer, the date on which the invoice was issued, a description of the product including the applicable supply chain model, the quantity of the product delivery and reference to related transport documentation, No physical delivery of certified CPO and palm kernel. Delivery only conducted for uncertified CPO and palm kernel.
STATUS (NC/AoC/ Compliant) Compliant
5. Training 5.1.
The facility shall provide training for all staff as required to implement the requirements of the Supply Chain Certification Systems
Training for all personnel regarding implementation of Supply Chain Certification System has been provided both for staff and st operator/administration level on October 31 2013
Compliant
6. Claims 6.1
The facility shall only make claims regarding the use of or support of RSPO certified oil palm products that are in compliance with the RSPO Rules for Communications and Claims.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
No claim has been made since there was no physical delivery of RSPO certified CPO and PK. The facility has awareness of the using of claim as required by RSPO Rules for Communications and Claims.
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Compliant
Page 99 of 118
Audit Report
3.3.2.2 Supply Chain Certification System Supply Chain Certification System
STATUS (YES/NO)
Have the client made aware that until they receive written confirmation of their RSPO Supply Chain certification registration and its expiry date that they are not certified and cannot make any claims concerning registration?
Yes
Have the client made aware what actions they may have to complete before certification can proceed?
Yes
Have the client made aware of the findings of the audit team including any deficiencies which may result in a negative certification decisions or which may require further actions to be completed before a certification decision can be taken?
Yes
Have the client made aware that when there is a projected overproduction, SAI Global shall decide whether an interim visit is required?
Yes
Have detail records been compiled of the closing meeting including:
Yes
a list of the participants in the meeting
records of certified FFB received on monthly basis
records of CSPO and certified PK produced
records of CSPO and certified PK sold (under GreenPalm and UTZ system) to each buyer
Have the client made aware that the findings of the audit team are tentative pending review and decision making by the duly designated representatives of the certification body?
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Yes
Page 100 of 118
Audit Report
3.4
Recommendation
The recommendation from this audit is your certification can proceed as a producer of RSPO Certified Sustainable Palm and Palm Kernel, Mass Balance Model. Audit recommendations are always subject to ratification by RSPO. This report was prepared by: Eko Purwanto, Bayu Abirowo, Dirgantara Bayu Lesmana, Edy Widodo and Iwan Setiawan.
3.5
3.6
Environmental and social risk for this scope of certification for planning of the surveillance audit Environmental risk: compliance with regulations, hazardous waste management, RKL RPL reporting Social risk: compliance with regulations OHS: prevention of hazard and risk
Acknowledgement of Internal Responsibility and Formal Sign-off of Assessment Findings
Signed for and on behalf of PT. SAI Global Indonesia
Inge Triwulandari Technical Manager Date September 15, 2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 101 of 118
Audit Report
Appendix A – Audit Plan Date
Auditor
20.01.2014
Audit meetings plus functions/ processes/ areas/ *shifts audited:
# Shifts*
Times* From – To
Day 1
Eko, Bayu, Tara, Edy
21.01.2014
Travelling Jakarta - Pekanbaru – Site (Peranap)
First flight by Garuda
Day 2 Office All
Opening meeting
08.00 – 08.30
Document review & Site Visit Edy
08.30 am – 05.00 pm
Bayu
Criteria: 1.1, 1.2 all indicators Criteria: 2.1 all indicators (social and human resources) Criteria: 2.2 indicator major 3, and minor 1, 2 Criteria: 2.3 all indicators Criteria: 4.6 indicator minor 2 and 3 Criteria: 4.8 all indicators Criteria: 5.1 indicator major 1 Criteria: 6.1 indicator major 1 and minor 1,2,4 Criteria: 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, 6.11 all indicators Criteria: 8.1 all indicators
08.30 am – 05.00 pm
Tara
Criteria: 2.1 all indicators (Occupational Health and Safety) Criteria: 4.1 indicator major 2 and minor 1, 2 (mill) Criteria: 4.7 all indicators
08.30 am – 05.00 pm
Criteria: 2.1 all indicators Criteria: 4.4 indicator minor 1 (estate), 2, 3 Criteria: 4.6 indicator major 4 (estate) Criteria: 5.1 indicator major 2 and minor 1 Criteria: 5.3 all indicators (estate) Criteria: 5.4 all indicators Criteria: 5.6 all indicators Criteria: 6.1 indicator major 1 and minor 2,3 Criteria: 8.1 all indicators
08.30 am – 05.00 pm
Eko
22.01.2014
Criteria: 2.2 indicator major 1, 2 Criteria: 3.1 all indicators Criteria: 4.1 indicators major 1 and minor 1,2 (estate)
Day 3
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15th, 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 94 of 118
Audit Report
Date
Auditor
Edy
Eko
Audit meetings plus functions/ processes/ areas/ *shifts audited:
Site Visit Criteria: 4.1 indicators major 1 and minor 1,2 (estate) Criteria: 4.2 all indicators Criteria: 4.3 all indicators Criteria: 4.5 all indicators Criteria: 4.6 indicators major 1,2, 3 and minor 1 Criteria: 5.5 indicator major 1,2 Criteria: 4.4 indicator minor 1,2,3 Criteria: 4.6 indicator major 4 Criteria: 5.1 indicator major 2 and minor 1 Criteria: 5.3 all indicators Criteria: 5.4 all indicators Criteria: 5.6 all indicators Criteria: 6.1 indicator major 1 and minor 2,3 Criteria: 8.1 all indicators Public Consultation Interview with labour union: SP and Gender Committee
Bayu Interview with employees of Estate
# Shifts*
Times* From – To
08.00 am – 05.00 pm
08.00 am – 05.00 pm
08.00 am – 05.00 pm
Interview with local community
Tara
Site Visit (Mill & Estate) Criteria: 4.1 indicators major 2 and minor 1, 2 (mill) Criteria: 5.5 indicator major 3 and minor 1 Criteria: 8.1 all indicators
08.00 am – 05.00 pm
Traveling Jakarta-Pekanbaru-Site Iwan
23.01.2014
Document review RSPO Criteria: 4.4 indicator major 1 Criteria: 5.2 all indicators
08.00 am – 05.00 pm
Day 4 Edy
Audit continue (legal aspect and best agricultural practice)
08.00 am – 03.00 pm
RSPO SCCS
08.00 am – 03.00 pm
Eko
Bayu
Audit continue (environmental aspect) Site visit: Observation of Facility in Topaz Mill and Estate and Seed Garden Estate
08.00 am – 03.00 pm
Audit continue (social aspect)
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15th, 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 94 of 118
Audit Report
Date
Auditor
Audit meetings plus functions/ processes/ areas/ *shifts audited:
Tara
Audit continue (occupational health and safety aspect and good manufacturing practices)
08.00 am – 03.00 pm
Iwan
Site Visit RSPO Criteria: 4.4 indicator major 1 Criteria: 5.2 all indicators
08.00 am – 03.00 pm
All
Closing Meeting
All
Travel Site – Pekanbaru
24.01.2014
# Shifts*
Times* From – To
03.00 pm Pm
Day 5 All
Pekanbaru – Jakarta
Am
All applicable requirements of relevant standards were covered during the audit of the ‘Functions/Processes/Areas. * Enter shift details only where applicable.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15th, 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 94 of 118
Audit Report
Appendix B – Nonconformities and Opportunity for Improvement Summary RSPO Principle and Criteria, Indonesian National Interpretation Activity #:
Client:
NA
Function/Area/Process:
PT. PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Estate and Mill Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau RSPO Certification Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-01 Category: Major System clause 4.2.4 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: Evidence of compliance with partial certification requirements can be shown during audit. Requirement: RSPO Certification System clause 4.2.4 Objective evidence: No evidence that the organisation has evaluated partial certification requirements for un certified unit. rd
Due Date: March 23 2014
Audit Team Leader
Name
Eko Purwanto
Date:
23/01/2014
Organisation’s acknowledgement of receipt of NCR
Name
Welly Pardede
Date:
23/01/2014
SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: - Person interviewed during audit did not understand partial certification requirements of RSPO certification system - Internal audit actually has been done by Regional Office for assessing partial certification requirements of RSPO certification system - Internal audit reports for un-certified unit was not available at the time of audit Correction with completion dates: Submit internal audit report for un-certified units as evidence of compliance with partial certification requirements to SAI Global Indonesia Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Assign person in charge for fulfilment of partial certification requirements and disseminate information of partial certification requirements of RSPO certification system Ensure that evidence of internal audit of un-certified units are available during RSPO certification audit Organisation Representative :
Name:
Welly Pardede
Date:
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - RSPO Internal Audit report for un-certified units have been shown, the report indicated that the organisation has reviewed requirements of RSPO certification system section 4.2.4. e, f, g, and h. The internal audit report indicated that partial certification requirements have been met. - Management has appointed SPO officer to ensure that all partial requirements to be covered during RSPO Internal Audit report, and to ensure that evidence of compliance with partial certification requirements are available and can be shown during audit. NCR 2014-01 was closed Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto Date: 23/03/2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15th, 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 95 of 109
Audit Report
Activity #:
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
Client:
NA
Function/Area/Process:
Mill RSPO Criterion 2.1. Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-02 Category: indicator major 1 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: There was no documented evidence of compliance with laws and regulations.
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau Major
Requirement: RSPO Criterion 2.1. indicator major 1 Objective evidence: a. Compliance with several laws and regulations have not been evaluated, e.g. - PP 81/2012 (Pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga dan sejenisnya), - Per.Men LH 21/2008 (Baku Mutu Emisi Sumber tidak bergerak), - Per.Menkes 416/1990, Permenaker No.25/2008 (Diagnosis PAK), - KepMenaker No.609/2012 (Pedoman Penyelesaian kasus kecelakaan kerja dan PAK). - Per.Gub Riau No. 35/2007 (Limbah cair) b. Based on latest resume medical check-up of audiometry test it was noted 16 mills employees and 34 estate employees were not in normal condition (hearing losses) also based on spirometer it was noted 22 estate employees were had lungs restriction, however there was no further investigation (anamneses and diagnoses) from the medical doctor which is required by Permenaker No.2/1980 article 3 point 6. c. Some workers have not been covered by national insurance program (Jamsostek) as required by Kepmenakertrans no.150/1999, e.g. some PHL workers (81 harvesters and 62 people in maintenance work) Due Date: March 23
Audit Team Leader
rd
2014
Name
Eko Purwanto
Date:
23.01.2014
Organisation’s acknowledgement of receipt of NCR
Name
Welly Pardede
Date:
23/01/2014
SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: a. Evaluation of legal compliance regarding: - PP 81/2012 (Pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga dan sejenisnya), - Per.MenLH 21/2008 (Baku Mutu Emisi Sumber tidak bergerak), - Per.Menkes 416/1990, PermenakerNo.25/2008 (Diagnosis PAK), - KepMenakerNo.609/2012 (Pedoman Penyelesaian kasus kecelakaan kerja dan PAK). - Per.Gub Riau No. 35/2007 (Limbah cair) Were not done because there was no appointed personnel (Humas) to conduct the monitoring of evaluation. b. There has been no further action regarding the illness of employees based on Medical Check Up because the unit has no understanding about the further action. c. Not all estate PHL workers (81 members’ harvesters and 62 members’ up-keeper) registered in the national insurance program (Jamsostek) because there was no monitoring about the membership of Jamsostek. Correction with completion dates: a. Conduct evaluation of legal compliance, legal aspects regarding: - PP 81/2012 (Pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga dan sejenisnya), - Per.MenLH 21/2008 (Raw Mutu Emisi Sumber tidak bergerak), - Per.Menkes 416/1990, PermenakerNo.25/2008 (Diagnosis PAK), - KepMenakerNo.609/2012 (Pedoman Penyelesaian kasus kecelakaan kerjadan PAK). - No. Per.Gub Riau. 35/2007 (Limbah cair) b. Milll: Measuring the noise level in the work area to avoid occupational diseases Estate: Each worker who was exposed by the risk of occupational disease based on Medical Check Up hired to another job. QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 106 of 118
Audit Report
c.
Registering PHL employees (81 members of harvester and 62 members of up-keeper) in to the national insurance program (Jamsostek).
Completion date: 28/02/2014 Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): a. KTU (head of administration) responsible for documenting and ensuring completeness of the content of legal compliance evaluation document through regulation updates in Legal Compliance Evaluation file. b. KTU ensure all MCU identification results, if there were abnormalities of workers based on the results of the MCU then immediately performed further action. c. Note / record all the workers who were not registered in the national insurance program (Jamsostek) and issue letter of confirmation from the Manager to KTU regarding responsibility of KTU to monitor each employee’s Jamsostek membership. Organisation Representative :
Name:
Date:
Welly Pardede
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - Evaluation of compliance in regards to legal aspects regarding: - PP 81/2012 (Pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga dan sejenisnya), - Per.MenLH 21/2008 (Raw Mutu Emisi Sumber tidak bergerak), - Per.Menkes 416/1990, PermenakerNo.25/2008 (Diagnosis PAK), - KepMenakerNo.609/2012 (Pedoman Penyelesaian kasus kecelakaan kerjadan PAK). - No. Per.Gub Riau. 35/2007 (Limbah cair) was evident - Noise level measurement result was available and mutation letter of employee who were exposed by to the risk of occupational disease based on Medical Check Up was also available. - Registration letter of PHL worker to national insurance program (Jamsostek) was available. - KTU responsibilities have been added by the management including updating regulation and applicable laws in the Legal Compliance Evaluation. Added responsibilities also cover ensuring immediate further action if there any abnormalities of workers based on the results of the MCU. NCR 2014-02 is closed Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Date: 23/03/2014
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 107 of 118
Audit Report
Activity #:
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
Client:
NA
Function/Area/Process:
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Estate Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau RSPO Criterion 2.2. Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-03 Category: Major indicator major 2 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: Maintenance has not been carried out entirely on the BPN peg conforming to the BPN measurement; measurement certificate no. 01/INHU/2000, and Special Situations Map dated 01/08/1997 no. 12/1997, a map with a scale of 1 : 40,000. Requirement: RSPO Criterion 2.2. indicator major 2 Objective evidence:
Map of HGU pegs was not entirely equipped with BPN numbering and coordinate and peg conditions was poorly maintained.
Records / documents such as map of BPN pegs, list of BPN pegs with its coordinates and maintenance of pegs (legal boundaries) cannot be shown during audit. rd
Due Date: March 23 2014
Audit Team Leader
Name
Eko Purwanto
Date:
23.01.2014
Organisation’s acknowledgement of receipt of NCR
Name
Welly Pardede
Date:
23/01/2014
SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: 1. Due to the installation of HGU (concession) peg was old, so the numbering was no more clearly visible. 2. Records of concession map and the coordinates were not properly maintained. 3. Maintenance of concession peg has not been done entirely. Correction with completion dates:
1. Completing HGU peg numbers accordance with the peg number in the concession map. 2. Crosscheck HGU peg numbers with the coordinate point in the concession map. 3. Performed and recorded maintenance of HGU peg. Completion date: 28/02/2014 Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Performed HGU peg monitoring in six monthly basis. Inspection and maintenance of peg report has already included cleaning and replacement of damage pegs. Humas (public relation) has responsibility to conduct the process. Organisation Representative :
Name:
Welly Pardede
Date:
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response is acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 21/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - HGU peg number has been completed and the concession coordinate map was available so that the appointed personnel (sustainability officer) can performed crosscheck between coordinate points in the map with HGU peg in the field. - Records of HGU peg maintenance were available in the “Laporan Pemeriksaan dan Perawatan Patok Batas” and program of HGU peg monitoring was available in “Jadwal Pemeriksaan dan Perawatan Patok Batas” scheduled in June and December. NCR 2014-03 was closed Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure:
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 108 of 118
Audit Report
Name: Eko Purwanto Activity #:
NA
Date: 23/03/2014 PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
Client:
Function/Area/Process:
Mill RSPO Criterion 4.4 Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-04 indicator minor 2 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: BOD of mill effluent was not complied ?with the environmental limit.
Category:
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau Minor
Requirement: RSPO Criterion 4.4 indicator minor 2 Objective evidence: th According to Report of Analysis of mill effluent dated December 5 2013, BOD value was 9,673.5 mg/l, while the standard based on KepMenLH 28/2003, Pergubri 35/2007, SNI 06-6989.72-2009 and RKL dokumen was 5000 mg/l. Organisation’s Name Eko Purwanto Name Welly Pardede Audit Team acknowledgement of Leader Date: 23.01.2014 Date: 23/01/2014 receipt of NCR SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: Circulation pump available was only one unit, so that impacted to increased value of BOD. Correction with completion dates: Installing one more circulation pump. Completion date: 15/02/2014 Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Ensure that both circulation pump were operates by records both Hour Machines. Organisation Representative :
Name:
Welly Pardede
Date:
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 21/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness Another circulation pump has been installed so that now there were two circulation pumps. Record of both circulation pump operation (hour machine) was available. Result of analysis from environmental forensic rd laboratory of University of Riau dated December 23 2013 was available and the result is that BOD level was 3,185 mg/L (normal). NCR 2014-04 is closed. Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto Date: 23/03/2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 109 of 118
Audit Report
Activity #:
Client:
NA
Function/Area/Process:
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Mill Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau RSPO Criterion 4.7 Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-05 Category: Major indicator major 1 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: There were no clear rules and/or mechanism to ensure of transporter personnel (especially the palm shell transporter PT. SDS/PT. SK) were concern about OHS regulation as it was observed that several transporter personnel did not use proper PPE while climbing the trucks which were above 2 metres high. Requirement: RSPO Criterion 4.7 indicator major 1 Objective evidence: Based on the observation within the audit period, it was sighted several personnel of transporter, especially transporter of palm shell (PT SDS/ PT SK) was not wearing PPE (helmet and shoes) while loading the palm shell at the mill area. The transporter personnel also sighted climbing the trucks (above 2 metres high) to assist the loading activity. rd
Due Date: March 23 2014
Audit Team Leader
Name
Eko Purwanto
Date:
23.01.2014
Organisation’s acknowledgement of receipt of NCR
Name
Welly Pardede
Date:
23/01/2014
SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: There was still lack of effective communication with the transporter (PT.SDS / PT.SK) regarding the importance of the use of PPE and safety when working on the truck. Correction with completion dates: Disseminate to the transporter (PT.SDS / PT.SK) regarding the use of PPE and the importance of safety when working on the truck. Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Established mechanism regarding the use of PPE for contractors which enter factory work area. Organisation Representative :
Name:
Welly Pardede
Date:
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness
-
Records related dissemination regarding the use of PPE and the importance of safety to the contractor were available. - Mechanism regarding the use of PPE for contractors which enter factory work area was established in “Mekanisme Pemakaian APD bagi kontraktor memasuki areal pabrik”. NCR 2014-05 was closed. Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto Date: 23/03/2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 110 of 118
Audit Report
Activity #:
NA
Client:
Function/Area/Process:
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
Mill and Estate RSPO Criterion 4.7 Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-06 Category: indicator minor 3 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: Several high-risk routine activities were not covered in Risk Analysis in POM.
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau Minor
Requirement: RSPO Criterion 4.7 indicator minor 3 Objective evidence: Based on the observation during audit, it was sighted several personnel of transporter, especially transporter of palm shell (PT SDS/PT SK) was not wearing PPE (helmet and shoes) while loading the palm shell at the mill area. The transporter personnel also sighted was climbing the trucks (above 2 meters high) to assist the loading activities. Organisation’s Name Eko Purwanto Name Welly Pardede Audit Team acknowledgement of Leader Date: 23.01.2014 Date: 23/01/2014 receipt of NCR SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: Risk analysis has not been performed for work in a limited space and for the workers who work at heights. Correction with completion dates: 1. Conducting risk analysis in confined spaces and for work at height 2. Provide gas detector 3. Provide Full Body Harness Completion date: 28/02/2014 Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Established job safety analysis before doing work in confined spaces and working at heights Organisation Representative :
Name:
Welly Pardede
Date:
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - Risk analysis in confined spaces and for work at height has been established. - Gas detector and full body harness have been provided. - Job safety analysis before doing work in confined spaces and working at heights has been established. Documented system that required job safety analysis was done before working was stated in the Job Safety Analysis format, it was also stated that Ahli K3 (OHS personnel) responsible to ensure that job safety analysis was done before working and the Manager has full responsibility for all activities in regard technical, non-technical and safety aspects. NCR 2014-06 is closed. Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto Date: 23/03/2014
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 111 of 118
Audit Report
Activity #:
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
Client:
NA
Function/Area/Process:
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Mill Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau RSPO Criterion 5.3 Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-07 Category: Major indicator major 2 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: Hazardous waste temporary storage exceeds the time limits specified in the permit storage (4/BPMD&PPT/BPLB3/XI/2013). Requirement: RSPO Criterion 5.3 indicator major 2 Objective evidence: nd th Based on the existing manifest, hazardous waste shipment was made on May 22 , 2013 and December 9 , 2013, the time interval exceeds the maximum temporary storage limit (90 days) specified in the license no. 4/BPMD & PPT/BP-LB3/XI/2013. rd
Due date: March 23 2014
Audit Team Leader
Name
Eko Purwanto
Date:
23.01.2014
Organisation’s acknowledgement of receipt of NCR
Name
Welly Pardede
Date:
23/01/2014
SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: Monitoring of hazardous waste transportation was not performed consistently. Correction with completion dates: Inform Regional Office 2 to transport hazardous waste before reaching 90 days and established schedule of hazardous waste transport in coordination with Regional Office 2 Department of Environment. Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Environment Staff of Regional Office Pekanbaru will ensure that temporary storage of hazardous waste was not over than 90 days through the use of temporary storage logbook. Organisation Representative :
Name:
Date:
Welly Pardede
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - Program of hazardous waste transportation has been established in “Rencana dan Realisasi Pengangkutan Limbah B3”, for Peranap Mill was scheduled in March, June, September and December. - Logbook of hazardous waste temporary storage was available in “Lembar Kegiatan Penyimpanan Limbah B3” covers type of hazardous waste, date of entry, source, quantity, date taken out, quantity taken out and destination, evidence that Environment Staff of Regional Office Pekanbaru has monitored the logbook was available. NCR 2014-07 was closed. Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Date: 23/03/2014
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 112 of 118
Audit Report
Activity #:
NA
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
Client:
Function/Area/Process:
Mill and Estate RSPO Criterion 6.2. Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-08 Category: indicator minor 1 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: The outside grower has not been recognized as stakeholder for sustainability support
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau Major
Requirement: RSPO Criterion 6.2. indicator major 1 Objective evidence: The stakeholder list did not contain any local farmers as outside supplier. rd Due Date: March 23 2014 Organisation’s Name Eko Purwanto Name Welly Pardede Audit Team acknowledgement of Leader Date: 23.01.2014 Date: 23/01/2014 receipt of NCR SAI Global Verification Method: (record if site visit is required or what information is to be provided): Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: Source of outside FFB supplier has not been added to stakeholder list because unit personnel (KTU) were not aware that FFB suppliers are part of stakeholder. Correction with completion dates: Adding outside FFB supplier into the stakeholder list Completion date: 28/02/2014 Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Mill KTU (Head of administration) responsibility has been added in regard of ensuring that if there was addition of FFB Supplier will be added in the stakeholders list. Organisation Representative :
Name:
Date:
Welly Pardede
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - Outside FFB supplier has been added to the stakeholder list including address, contact person, phone number should be mentioned in detail - Responsibilities of Mill KTU has been added in regard of ensuring the addition of outside FFB Supplier to the stakeholders list if there was new FFB supplier. NCR 2014-08 was closed. Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Date: 23/03/2014
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 113 of 118
Audit Report
Activity #:
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
Client:
NA
Function/Area/Process:
Estate RSPO Criterion 5.2. Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-09 Category: indicator major 2 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: The company doesn’t have appropriate measures to preserve existing HCV.
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau Major
Requirement: RSPO Criterion 5.2. indicator major 2 Objective evidence: The Company doesn’t have SOP which is specific for the HCV management. rd
Due Date: March 23 2014
Audit Team Leader
Name
Eko Purwanto
Date:
23.01.2014
Organisation’s acknowledgement of receipt of NCR
Name
Welly Pardede
Date:
23/01/2014
SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: Procedure of HCV management has been established, however document keeping has not been carried out properly, makes it difficult to identify quickly. Correction with completion dates: Shows the procedure of specific HCV management. Completion date: 28/02/2014 Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Improving documentation system by appointing KTU as personnel in charge to monitor the availability and updating of all documented procedures. Completion date: 28/02/2014 Organisation Representative :
Name:
Date:
Welly Pardede
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - Procedure of specific HCV management was available and can be shown. - KTU responsibilities have been added by the management in regard ensuring the availability and updating of documented procedures. NCR 2014-09 is closed Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure: Name: Eko Purwanto
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
Date: 23/03/2014
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 114 of 118
Audit Report
Activity #:
NA
Client:
Function/Area/Process:
PT. Rigunas Agri Utama Peranap Mill and its supply base Site:
App/Cert:
FMS40006
Mill and Estate Kab. Indragiri Hulu, Riau RSPO Criterion 5.2. Std. and Clause No(s): NCR#: 2014-10 Category: Major indicator major 3 Section 1- Details of non-conforming situation: Non-conforming situation: Measures taken for protecting species and their habitats included actions to control any illegal or inappropriate hunting, fishing or collecting activities have not been in accordance with relevant laws. Requirement: RSPO Criterion 5.2. indicator major 3 Objective evidence: 1. The HCV Management Plan and its implementation did not cover conservation and monitoring of rare or threatened species and their habitats, which were HCV 1 key elements: Southeast Asian Box Turtle Coura amboinensis, and Southeast Asian Soft shell Turtle Amyda cartilaginea. 2. Controls of illegal wildlife hunting, fishing, or harvesting, have not been implemented in a planned and consistent manner. Efforts were limited to the establishing of information/warning/prohibition boards. rd Due Date: March 23 2014 Organisation’s Name Eko Purwanto Name Welly Pardede Audit Team acknowledgement of Leader Date: 23.01.2014 Date: 23/01/2014 receipt of NCR SAI Global Verification Method: Off site (document verification) Section 2- Organisation’s Response: Root Cause Analysis: Earlier version of Conservation Management Plan (CMP) did not cover all the key species suggested by HCV Assessment Report because it did not refer to the specific report of each unit. Correction with completion dates: 1. CMP has been revised by adding monitoring program of endangered habitat and key species based on HCV Assessment Report of each unit. 2. Shows laws and regulations in program of Conservation Management Plan in regard wildlife hunting, fishing and harvesting. Completion date: 28/02/2014 Corrective Action Taken/Planned (with completion date(s): Estate manager ensure that Conservation Management Plan is implemented and periodically reviewed Organisation Representative :
Name:
Welly Pardede
Date:
21/03/2014
Section 3- SAI Global Response Review: Response was acceptable please see section 4 for details. Reviewer: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Section 4- SAI Global Verification of Corrective Action for effectiveness - Monitoring Program of endangered habitat and species (key species) based on HCV Assessment Report of PT. Rigunas Agri Utama-Peranap Mill has been added in the Conservation Management Plan, including the method of line transect, personnel in charge and due date. - In the Conservation Management Plan, it has been described that Estate Manager and Assistant were responsible for implementation of CMP, including direct method which is conducting dissemination in regard of prohibition of hunting in production area and indirect dissemination through the use of signboard in regard of prohibition of wildlife hunting. - Laws and Regulation have been added in the CMP as the basic of illegal wildlife hunting control, e.g.: IUCN Red list and CITES (international regulation for protected wildlife) UU No.5/1990 (Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems) PP No.7/1999 (List of protected plants and animals) Kepres No.32/1990 (Management of protected areas). NCR 2014-10 was closed. Section 5- SAI Global NCR Closure:
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 115 of 118
Audit Report
Name: Eko Purwanto
Date: 23/03/2014
Mill Supply Chain Certification System None
Opportunities for improvement – RSPO P & C Criterion 5.2 indicator major 2 It could be considered to improve the HCV management and monitoring SOP. Criterion 5.2 indicator minor 1
It could be considered to improve HCV awareness by involving other participants outside Estate. It could be considered to improve information/warning/prohibition boards.
Opportunities for improvement – RSPO SC None
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 116 of 118
Audit Report
Appendix C – Stakeholder’s issues and comment
Date
Stakeholder
Observation
22 of January 2014
Union Leader
The union name was registered as “PUK Serikat Pekerja Pertanian dan Perkebunan Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia PT. Riguna th Agri Utama” which was founded on October 11 2012. Meeting with management was held as necessary such as: sponsorship for national celebration event, fringe benefit payment for “hari raya”, etc. No significant complaint by workers so far.
Gender committee
The gender committee has done gender policy awareness and regular meeting with female workers in monthly basis. No harassment identified st since the committee was founded on October 21 , 2012. Minutes of the meeting were also documented.
Society leaders
As result from the interview, basically the company has implemented few CSR activities to support local communities in term of infrastructure development, health services, provision of education facilities, etc. No negative feedback reported by interviewees. No land conflict identified where the land was previously granted by government (not taken over from local communities). As told by the leaders, there was no air or water pollution caused by the company due to continuous effort in managing the environmental risks. The company has also employed local peoples (in majority) both for Mill and Estate.
Smallholders
Two smallholders from different KUD (farmer groups) were interviewed. In general, the smallholders were satisfied with the company in term of supply mechanism, development support and pricing. FFB payment was also made timely through bank transfer.
Independent FFB suppliers
The out grower was selected for years as FFB supplier for the company. Agreement was documented in term of supply capability, term of payment including TBS selection criteria. Payment was also made to out grower in a few days (normally 2-3 days) after invoicing.
Workers (fertilizing, spraying, mill processing, workshop)
All workers were provided with basic facilities for free: PPE, housing, electricity, clean water, etc. Wages including overtime pay and bonus were paid timely in accordance to local minimum wage (UMK). Annual leaves and fringe benefit were also applied to workers. No complaints identified so far during interview session with the workers.
nd
nd
22 of January 2014
nd
22 of January 2014
nd
22 of January 2014
nd
22 of January 2014
nd
22 of January 2014
There has been no written feedback from letters sent.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 117 of 118
Audit Report
Appendix D – Definition of, and action required with respect to audit findings: RSPO Principle and Criteria, Indonesian National Interpretation: Major Nonconformities occur when system is failing to meet a relevant compulsory indicator. Action required: This category of findings requires SAI Global to issue a formal NCR; to receive and approve client’s proposed correction and corrective action plans; and formally verify the effective implementation of planned corrections and corrective action. Correction and corrective action plan must be submitted to SAI Global for approval within 14 days of the audit. Follow-up action by SAI Global must ‘close out’ the NCR or reduce it to a lesser category within 90 days or less where specified. Certificate of conformance to the RSPO Criteria cannot be issued while any major nonconformity is outstanding. Major nonconformities raised during surveillance audit shall be addressed within 60 days, or the certificate will be suspended. Major nonconformities not addressed within a further 60 days will result in the certificate being withdrawn. Minor Nonconformities occur when system is failing to meet other indicators. Action required: This category of findings requires SAI Global to issue a formal NCR; to receive and approve client’s proposed correction and corrective action plans; and formally verify the effective implementation of planned corrections and corrective action. In this instance, a certificate may still be awarded providing the root cause of the problem is identified and an acceptable plan is put in place to achieve the outstanding requirements in an agreed time frame. Verification will be made at subsequent surveillance audits. Minor nonconformities will be raised to major if they are not addressed by the following surveillance audit. Opportunity for Improvement is a documented statement, which may identify areas for improvement, but shall not make specific recommendation(s). Client may develop and implement solutions in order to add value to operations and management systems. SAI Global is not required to follow-up on this category of audit finding. RSPO Supply Chain Certification System: Major Nonconformities occur when system is failing to implement and/or maintain requirements of Supply Chain Certification System. Action required: This category of findings requires SAI Global to issue a formal NCR; to receive and approve client’s proposed correction and corrective action plans; and formally verify the effective implementation of planned corrections and corrective action. When non-conformances rose after the certification, RSPO shall be informed of these non-conformances within 7 days since non-conformance rose. A maximum of one month is given to the certified client to satisfactorily address the non-conformances. The effectiveness of the action taken for the non-conformances shall be assessed before closing out the non-conformances. Should the non-conformances not be addressed within the one month maximum time frame, a suspension or withdrawal of the certificate and a full re-audit may be necessary. Where objective evidence indicates that there has been a demonstrable breakdown in the supply chain caused by the certified client’s action or inactions, and that palm oil product that has been or is about to be shipped is falsely identified as RSPO certified product, immediate action needs to be taken by SAI Global, and the RSPO Supply Chain certification shall be suspended until such time that it has been addressed. The RSPO shall be notified within 24 hours of this occurrence and further impacts on relevant supply chain certifications. Area of concern issued when there is an area of the system for which the client is required to investigate potential nonconformity. Action required: SAI Global may require client to formulate preventive action plan for approval prior to next planned audit/certification decision or alternatively may follow up client’s preventive action at the next planned audit. Lack of client attention to such issues implies that a preventive action system is not working effectively. Opportunity for Improvement is a documented statement, which may identify areas for improvement, but shall not make specific recommendation(s). Client may develop and implement solutions in order to add value to operations and management systems. SAI Global is not required to follow-up on this category of audit finding.
QEF08sa.RSPO.01 / Issue Date: July 15 2013
© SAI Global Indonesia Copyright 2009
Page 118 of 118