Annual Report 2013
AT TORNEY
GENERAL’S OFFICE REPUBLIC OFDEPAN INDONESIA COVER
Annual Report 2013
AT TORNEY
GENERAL’S OFFICE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Jakarta 2014
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
I
FOREWORD
n deepest gratitude to The One Almighty God, The Republic of Indonesia Attorney General Office presented The 2013 Annual Report for all the people of Indonesia as the realization of commitment from The Attorney Service to inspire the principle of transparency through Transparent Public Information to guarantee the fulfilment of right of the constituent to obtain allinclusive information on law associated public policy development program and the achievement of The Attorney Service in 2013. The Republic of Indonesia Attorney General Office understands the value and necessity of the principle of transparency for the constituent to be able to actively participate in the observation over the performance of Attorney Service so as to ensure eradication on the chance for corruption, collusion and nepotism by the civil servant, and to give the opportunity to the public to provide inputs of advice and suggestion for decision making on Public Policy within Attorney Service in subsequent year, as well as ensuring a more accountable performance of The Republic of Indonesia Attorney Service. All of those were expected to deliver the final output of the establishment of Good Governance within The Attorney Service. This annual report is a document on the performance of The Attorney Service throughout 2013, which was composed from the compilation of work from many others who had contributed to the content which correlates with the developmental planning of Attorney Service within The Attorney Service 2010-2014 Strategic Planning, Attorney Service 2013 Work Plan, and the evaluations on periodical reports from all Attorney Offices throughout Indonesia. Numerous targets and achievements performed by Attorney Service in 2013 as proper to the government policy written in the National Development Plan were descripted within this annual report. The analysis on targets and achievements had become a component in the effort to synergize planning, organizational and implementation up to the phase of evaluation from every aspects, encompassing the elements of man, material and money, which was to accomplish the mapping of problems versus solution for the improvement and refinement of Attorney Service within the following year. We trust that the report would deliver aspiration and comprehension to the general public on the progressing organization of The Republic of Indonesia Attorney General Office to answer the challenges and public expectation, as well as to become a positive reference for the readers and the observators of law enforcement in Indonesia.
Jakarta, April 2014 Republic of Indonesia Attorney General
BASRIEF ARIEF ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
iii
TABLE OF CONTENT iii
Foreword
iv
Table of Contents
v
Doctrine
vi
Vision and Mission
viii
Duties and Powers
ix
Attorney General’s Order
2
CHAPTER I : Introduction
8
CHAPTER II : The Attroney General Office at a Glance
8
2.1 Attorney General Office Profile
11
2.2 Organizational Structure
14
2.3 Leadership Profile
24
CHAPTER III : Bureaucratic Reform
32
CHAPTER IV : Performance Achievements
32
4.1 Development
35
4.2 Intelligence
40
4.3 General Crimes
45
4.4 Special Crimes
51
4.5 Civil and Administrative Law
55
4.6 Internal and Extenal Supervisions
61
4.7 Education and Training Bureau
72
CHAPTER V : Other Activities
76
CHAPTER VI : Conclusions
80
Appendix : List of Provincial Attorney Offices, District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia.
iv
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
THE ATTORNEY’S DOCTRINE TRIKRAMA ADHYAKSA : SATYA ADHI WICAKSANA SATYA : Loyalty arising from honesty to Almighty God, oneself, one’s family and one’s fellowman.
ADHI : Perfection in the performance of one’s duties arising from one’s accountability to Almighty God, one’s family and one’s fellowman.
WICAKSANA : Wisdom in words and conduct, particularly in the application of one’s powers and authority.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
v
VISION & MISSION
Vision
For the Attorney General Office to become a law enforcement that is clean, efficient, transparent, and accountable, providing optimal services as part of the effort to ensure the supremacy of law in a professional, proportional and honorable manner, founded upon the principles of justice, truth and probity.
vi
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Mission
1. To optimize both the quantitatitve and qualitative performance of the Attorney General Office functions in performing duties and exercise of powers in aspects of the handling of criminal, civil and administrative cases, and to optimize the intelligence functions of the Attorney General Office in a professional, proportional and honorable manner through the appropriate, well-designed, focused, effective and efficient application of standard operating procedures. 2. To optimize the role of development and supervision so as to support other divisions in the performance of their duties, in particular regards to law enforcement. 3. To optimize public services in the legal field based upon full responsibility, principles, effectiveness and efficiency, and to hold the rights of the public in high regard. 4. To reform and reengineer the organizational structure of the Attorney General Office and the management of information system, particularly through the implementation of the quick-wins program so it may be easily accessed by the public, the preparation of a Blueprint for the development of Attorney General Office human resources over the mid and long terms up to 2025, the reform and reengineering of financial administrative management, improving infrastructure and facilities, and improving the welfare of staff through better remuneration to ensure a more effective, efficient, transparent, and accountable performance of the Attorney General Office. 5. To produce Attorney General Office officials whom are reliable, resilient, professional, and imbued by a high level of morals and ethics, in order to support the eloquence performance of foremost duties, function powers, particularly in regards to the effort of equitable law enforcement and other related duties.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
vii
DUTIES & POWERS Referring to Article 30 Legislation No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service, the duties and powers of the Attorney General Office are as follows:
Civil and Administrative Sector :
Criminal sector :
In the Public Order and Security Sector, the Attorney General Office has the following duties :
• To conduct prosecutions; • To enforce judicial orders and decisions of final and conclusive effect; • To conduct supervision of those serving conditional sentence, placed under supervision orders, or released on parole;
The prosecution service, based on special authority, may act both at home and abroad for and on behalf of the state or government.
• Improving the public’s awareness of the law; • Upholding law enforcement policies; • Oversight circulation of printed materials;
• To investigate certain types of suspected crime as stipulated by law;
• Oversight religious beliefs in respect to means that threaten society and the state;
• To complete certain types of case files, and for such purposes to conduct additional investigations prior to the forwarding of such files to the court, in manners of practices conducted through coordination with investigator(s).
• Preventing the misuse and/or denigration of religion;
viii
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
• Conducting legal research and development in law and statistics on crime.
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S ORDER DATED 22 JULY 2013 1. To maintain accountability of oneself and of the institution with full awareness on the impact caused from demeanor and attitude possessed by every personnel of The Republic of Indonesia (R.I) Attorney Service to not only oneself but also to one’s family and R.I Attorney Service as an institution as well; 2. To always take one’s parts in being the solution to the various problems in the society, as the embodiment of participation of Attorney Service among the constituent; 3. To be prepared for the 2014 National Election by conducting the tasks of Attorney Service for the success of an honest and just democratic event.
Jakarta, 22 July 2013 Republic of Indonesia Attorney General
BASRIEF ARIEF
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
ix
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
T
o optimize the performance of law enforcement as proper to the main duties and functions of The Attorney Service as stipulated in Legislation No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service which defines the action plan of R.I Attorney General Office’s mission that referred to the entirety of document on National Development Planning system, both in the Long Term National Development Planning (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional/RPJPN) 2010-2025, and in the Mid Term National Development Planning (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah/ RPJMN) 2010-2014, and Government Annual Workplan (Rencana Kerja Pemerintah/RKP), in every year Attorney Service had established a strict target on performance as well as put the best effort to accomplish the target on 2
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
performance as mandated. The effort to accomplish the target had double functions; first, to show the commitment of Attorney Service in giving positive constribution for achievement of the long term national development planning mission of “The Realization of an Autonomous, Progressive, Impartial and Prosperous Indonesia”, second, to demonstrate the vigor of Attorney Service in meeting the public demand to achieve trusted Attorney Service in its reform. In 2013, Attorney Service had made numerable achievements in law enforcement and internal organization as referred to bureaucratic reform program. Related to law enforcement, particularly to anti corruption as an implemented national priority, Attorney
Service had exceeded the target of 1.430 cases with accomplishment of 1.653 cases, or 115,59 % achievement. In prosecution the achievement was 141,47 %, or 2.023 cases the target of 1.430, with summative recovered public wealth of IDR 403.102.000.215 dan USD. 500.000 from the Special Crime division. These quantitative achievements could be assumed as astonishing ones considering the numbers of accomplishment which exceeding the target of budget supported outputs. Nonetheless, further improvement to leverage the quality of the achievements is still needed so as to give the aspect of public interest grand corruption to the managed cases. Attorney Service was aware of the need and will therefore, making a series of arrangement to meet the requirements as expected by the public on the justice treatment for anti corruption cases. Attorney Service divided General Crimes Division into three categories of Man and Possession, State Security and Public Order, and Other General Crime Acts. In 2013, General Crimes recorded 111.472 cases under all of the categories from all over Indonesia, which had 98,8% rate success of the case disposal or equal to 110.194. During the same year, by means of conducting civil court, the division of Civil and State Administrative had restored state’s possession of IDR 1.364.276.160.371,93 (One Trillion Three Hundred Sixty Four Billion Two Hundred Seventy Six Million One Hundred Sixty Thousand And Three Hundred Seventy One Indonesian Rupiah And Ninety Three Cents) and land measured + 13.250 m2. Referring to to the bureaucratic reform program, Attorney Service internal management by the use of balance score card theory had resulted in the following achievements of: 1. Stakeholders Aspect Among ministrial level institutions, Attorney Service achieved
5th place for The Most Transparent Public Information. However, although Attorney Service was positioned on the 5th place at the said level, Attorney Service achieved 1st place for The Most Transparent Public Information from all of the other existing national law enforcement institutions. The merit showed that Attorney Service had duly accepted transparency as an obligatory prerequisite for the accomplishment of a bureaucratic reform that is clean and devoid of corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN). As the stakeholder, the constituent would certainly benefited from the easy access of observation on Attorney Service, particularly on the side of the performance and budget expenditure of the institution, as well as from the participation for positive intervention over policies to be officially validated by Attorney Service in the future. 2. Business Process Aspect Attorney Service had succeeded in straightening up the aspect of business process, particularly in the organizing of existing Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) so as to become more adequately by adding a number of Attorney General’s Regulation, Attorney General’s Circular Letters and Junior Attorney Generals’ Circular Letters addressed to all members of the corps of Attorney Service in every location in order to give each of the task force the instructions and directions on the manners to apply orderliness and good procedure in their daily assignment as suitable to each scope of work. Some of the internal regulation issued in 2013 were: • R.I Attorney General’s Regulation No.: PER-015/A/JA/07/2013 dated July, 2nd, 2013 on Alteration to R.I
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
3
Attorney General’s Regulation No.: PER-022/A/JA/3/2011 on The Coordination for The Supervision of Attorney Service. • R.I Attorney General’s Regulation No.: PER-026/A/JA/10/2013 dated October, 3rd, 2013 on The Treatment and Protection for Informant of Law Infringement in Attorney Service. • R.I Attorney General’s Circular Letter No.: B-012/A/CU.2/01/2013 dated January, 18th, 2013 on The Manual for Accounting Policies and Completion on State Owned Credit from Corruption Cases Retribution. • R.I Attorney General’s Circular Letter No.: SE-0006/A/JA/03/2013 dated March, 25th, 2013 on Inter Division Collaborative Model between Civil and State Administrative with Intelligence, General Crimes and Special Crimes; to evade the possibility of conflict of interest. • R.I Attorney General’s Circular Letter No.: SE-002/A/JA/10/2013 dated October, 30th, 2013 on Principle of Impartiality by means of consideration on the standards for a quick, straightforward and low-cost court administration to the quality of the case, and the protocol for coordination with The National Police Force. 3. Learning & Development Aspect Attorney Service had proclaimed Zone of Integrity towards Anti Corruption Area as the form of high commitment from Attorney Service in organizing the aspect of Attorney Service personnel integrity for the process of Attorney Service performance that is clean and devoid of corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN). Subsequent to activities implemented during the
4
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
previous year for the improvement of the professionalism and competence of the Attorneys, in 2013 Attorney Service had performed three (3) times Assesment on Competence for the structural position of Echelon III, IV and Special Attorney for Corruption Cases, as conducted by a third party, to 6.324 participants with 39,64 % rate of passing, or equal to 2. 507 persons. 4. Financial Aspect Different from the importance of the financial aspect in profit oriented private sector that made it as the most important factor, the importance of financial aspect for Attorney Service as a public sector that had the objective of delivering quality service to the public is closely related to the effort in obtaining the state’s support for all of the performance of its program and activity as well as for the improvement of welfare for the personnel through the allocation of budget sector support in National Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN). This financial aspect was unquestionably affected by the level of trust from the government, People Representative Council (DPR) and the constituent on accountability of Attorney Service budget management and compliance of Attorney Service to the bureaucratic reform program as mandated by the government. Although it was proven by Audit Board (BPK) 2013 Report that Attorney Service had maintained accountable financial aspect as in the BPK 2012 Report of Unqualified Opinion With Clarifying Paragraph, Attorney Service itself deemed this accomplishment as insufficient and intends to conduct better organization for its financial management as proper to The National
Accounting Standard to achive better accountability that will erase the sentence of “With Clarifying Paragraph”, so as to reach the level of “Unqualified Opinion” as the final result of BPK assessment on Attorney Service financial report. Other than the accomplishment in restoring the loss of the state’s finance or possession either by way of criminal or civil lawsuit as previously described, in 2013 Attorney Service had recorded another over target achievement of 483,82 % in Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) of IDR 527.702.962.013 from the targeted IDR 109.069.182.094. The recorded noteworthy achievements from both the side of law enforcement and improvement of quality
through bureaucratic reform program were not regarded as sufficient by Attorney Service that will make further endeavour on the management for professional improvement in its human resource, establishment of a more orderly and free from KKN Attorney Service bureaucratic environment, optimal implementation of a bureaucratic reform program as proper to the process of planning, Attorney Service budgeting that had particular aim to structural development, management of Attorney Service human resource, and better institutional transparency and accountability from both sides of Attorney Service duties performance and financial management.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
5
CHAPTER II
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE AT A GLANCE
CHAPTER II
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE AT A GLANCE
T
he Attorney General Office is the government institution that exercises the state prosecutorial power. As an institution operates in the fields of law enforcement and justice, the Attorney General Office is headed by the Attorney General, who is appointed and removed by, and is directly accountable to the President. The Attorney General’s Office, Provincial Attorney’s Offices, District Attorney’s Offices and Branch Attorney Offices are all forming the state prosecutorial power. All compose an integral and inseparable entity.
2.1. ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE PROFILE The 1945 National Constitution mandated the law enforcers to stipulate equality in justice and government, 8
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
indicated that justice in the era of globalization shall be the ground for every governing acts to ensure the sense of justice and reasurre the presence of a just law to all the subjects. To create such conditions, the state law enforcers as the forefront officials must have an independent manner in performing their duties, irrespective to the differences within the social structure and classes existed in the general public that may influence the service. This demanded jurisdiction rationale in the form of implementation of law to assure the comprehensiveness on rights and obligations, and existence of social boundaries to freedom of every individual in doing the activities.
Under Legislation No. 16/2004, which superseded Law Number Number 5/1991 on the RI Attorney Service, the R.I Attorney Service, as one of the law enforcement institutions, required to deliver higher function in upholding legal supremacy, protection of public interest, upholding of human rights and eradication of corruption, collusion and nepotism. Under the preceding 2004 legislation, the RI Attorney Service, as the government institution responsible for exercising the power of the state in the prosecutorial field, must perform its duties in an independent manner, free from the influence of government or third parties (Legislation No. 16/2004 article 2 section 2).
Bureau. Legislation No. 16/ 2004 on R.I Attorney Service also stipulates the central position of the Attorney Service in the strategic role to maintain resilience of the nation, due to the responsibility held by the Attorney Service in investigating and prosecuting certain types of cases, and its intermediary position to filter the processes of investigation and trial, as well as ensuring the implementation of final and conclusive effect of judicial orders and decisions, hence the Attorney Service holds the control for the judicial process of a case (Dominus Litis) since the institution determines the prerequisitions to proceed any judicial actions for a case or not, based on admissible evidence, as defined by the Criminal Procedures Code.
In performing its duties and powers, the Attorney Service is led by the Attorney General with the assistance of one Deputy Attorney General and a number of Junior Attorneys General and the Head of the Education and Training
It should also be noted that the Attorney Service is the only state organization responsible for the implementation of judicial decisions (executive ambtenaar). Besides its role in criminal cases, the Attorney Service also
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
9
plays other roles in the sector of civil and administrative by acting as the state’s attorney on behalf of the government in issues on law enforcement, legal aid, legal advice, and other legal actions to the state or government, encompassing the institutions/agencies, central and local government institutions/agencies, and central and local government enterprises, for the safeguarding and recovering of state assets, and providing legal services to the public. In the part as the holder of those powers, Attorneys have the right to bring public prosecutions, implement judicial decisions, and conduct other powers as conferred by the Legislation No. 16/2004 articles 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 on R.I Attorney Service. The reform of Attorney Service organization and human resources is obligatory to adjust with the changing era, for irrespective to its extend and breadth, an organization would be rendered irrelevant should it fails to adjust to the change of times. This applies to the Attorney Service that consecutively conducting the comprehensive reform process in prosecutorial area, as implied by Legislation No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service. To implement the actions for the efforts in improving its performance as implied in the Legislation No. 16/2004 on the R.I Attorney Service, the Attorney Service has made considerable reforms based on the six Attorney General’s Regulation issued on 21 July 2007 that covers the following organizational aspects: (1) Recruitment of Civil Servants and Candidate Prosecutors; (2) Career Development; (3) Education and Training Bureau; (4) Minimum Professional Standards for Attorneys; (5)
10
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Code of Conduct; and (6) Supervisory Mechanisms. In performing its duties and powers, the Attorney Service is not only focused on handling of general crimes, but also corruption crimes, civil and administrative, as well as public complaints. The performance of these prime duties and functions is always based on the principle of equality before the law, without any distinction between individuals in regards to social status, ethnic group, religion nor race. Referring to the said six Attorney General’s Regulations, the Prosecution Service is fully aware that the success performance of duties requires collaboration and coordination with other existing law enforcement and judicial institutions. The 2012 Attorney Service Performance Development Agenda focused on bureaucratic reform through duties performance based on appropriate, well-designed, focused, effective and efficient standard operating procedures (SOP) to optimalize public services; conducted organizational reforms and formed professional, reliable, and accountable personnel to ensure proper duties performance as part of equitable and effective law enforcement process. The Attorney Service has the mandatory powers implicated in the Law to perform duties by conducting effective, appropriate, and costefficient monitoring and evaluation on administrative management and case disposal. Clean and upright case disposal will be potential to bring a good governance willed performance and handling of public impairing corruption cases that is expected to not only
convict of suspect, but also to ensure the significant recovery of state assets. To improve accountability, efficiency and effectiveness of systematic performance based on the pattern of good governance to prevent interference of cases as required in the application of good governance, the Attorney Service conducts direct connected supervision in collaboration with the public for followup actions on appropriate complaints, for optimum manners in handling and completion of cases and prevention on abuses of powers and ranks.
2.2. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE With the Presidential Regulation No. 38/2010 on R.I Attorney Services Organization and Management, the Attorney Service has been performing its duties in referrence to the virtue of Attorney General’s Regulation No. 009/A/JA/01/2011 on the Organization
and Work Procedures of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecution Service that has reformed organizational structure The Attorney General is the leader and highest office holder in the Prosecution Service, and is responsible for directing and controlling the implementation of the duties and powers of the Attorney Service. In the implementation of his duties and authority, the Attorney General is assisted by one Deputy Attorney General, a number of Junior Attorney Generals, and one Head of Bureau. The Junior Attorney Generals are as follows: (1) Junior Attorney General Development; (2) Junior Attorney General Intelligence; (3) Junior Attorney General General Crimes, (4) Junior Attorney General Special Crimes, (5) Junior Attorney General Civil and Administrative; (6) Junior Attorney General Supervision; and (7) Head of the Education and Training Bureau.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
11
The Deputy Attorney General has the duties and powers to assist the Attorney General in the implementation of his duties and to represent the Attorney General should the Attorney General be unavailable of service, as well as such other duties as assigned by the Attorney General. The Junior Attorney General Development has the duties to conduct planning, infrastructure and facilities development, organizational and administrative procedures, human resources and financial administration, management of state assets, provision of legal opinions, preparation of legislation and regulations, overseas collaboration engagement, and provision of other technical services and support. The Junior Attorney General Intelligence has investigative, security and support duties concerned with the prevention of crime so as to support law enforcement of a preventive or coercive nature in the areas of ideology, politics, economics, finance, socio-cultural, defense and security; imposing travel bans, and helping to uphold public order and security. The Junior Attorney General General Crimes has the duties and powers in the management of general crimes encompassing pre-prosecution, additional investigation, prosecution, appeal, and enforcement of judicial orders and decisions of final and conclusive effect; examination and supervision of of those serving conditional sentence, placed under supervision orders, or released on parole, and other legal actions. The Junior Attorney General Special Crimes has the duties and powers in the management of general crimes
12
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
that are governed by special criminal procedures encompassing investigation, examination, pre-prosecution, additional investigation, prosecution, appeal, and enforcement of judicial orders and decisions of final and conclusive effect; examination and supervision of of those serving conditional sentence, placed under supervision orders, or released on parole, and other legal actions. The Junior Attorney General Civil and Administrative has the duties and powers in the management of civil, and state administrative and constitutional cases encompassing law enforcement, state attorneys, provision of legal advice and other legal actions to the state and government including state institutions/ agencies, central and local government institutions/agencies, and state and regionally owned enterprises, in order to the safeguarding and recovery of state assets, preservation of government authority, and provision of legal services to the public. The Junior Attorney General Supervision has the duties and powers in the management of of effective internal supervision through planning, implementation and controlling the implementation of Attorney Service internal performance and financial supervision, and implement supervision on particular purposes as assigned by the Attorney General in accordance to the laws and regulations in effect. The Education and Training Bureau has the duties and powers in the provision of education and training within the context of strengthen and development of Attorney Service personnel competencies and professionalism.
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ATTORNEY SERVICE CHART OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
13
2.3. LEADERSHIP PROFILES Personal Data : Nam
: H. BASRIEF ARIEF, B.A., M.A. Place/Date of Birth : Tanjung Enim, January, 23rd, 1947 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1975 2. Master of Arts from Faculty of Law, 2000
In-Service : 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training, 1987 General Crimes Training, 1988 SPADYA, 1990 Smuggling Crimes Training, 1992 SESPANAS, 1995 National Defense Institution (LEMHANAS), 1999
Career : SATYALENCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by the R.I President, in 1998
H. BASRIEF ARIEF, B.A., M.A. Republic of Indonesia Attorney General
T
he man who received numerous merits throughout his career in the Attorney Service. Born in Tanjung Enim, South Sumatra, his career at Echelon III was initiated as Head of Belawan District Attorney Office in North Sumatra, that was followed by the assignment as Head of Outreach Division at R.I Attorney General Office, Head of Cibinong District Attorney Office in West Java, Head of Centre Jakarta District Attorney Office, Assistant for General Crimes Section in Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office, Expert Staff in 1998, Head of General Bureau at R.I Attorney General Office, Head of Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office, Junior Attorney General Intelligence,
14
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
and was appointed as R.I Deputy Attorney General. He was inaugurated by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as R.I Attorney General on Friday November, 26th, 2010. H. Basrief Arief, BA.MA is one of the the prominent leaders whose range of experience in technical abilities from various formal and non-formal overseas assignment had become a guideline for all personnel of Adyaksa, either at the local level or in R.I Attorney General Office. H. Basrief Arief, B.A.,M.A., the renowned person for his religious and probity during his career in the corps that had upraised his name, had once become Head of Corruption Investigation Committee established by the Coordinating Minister of Political, Legal and Security Affairs.
Personal Data : Name
: D. ANDHI NIRWANTO, B.A., M.A. Place/Date of Birth : Kudus, January, 8th, 1956 Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e) Service No. : 19560108 198103 1 004 Registry No. : 6815612 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts, 1979 2. Master of Arts, 1998 3. Candidate for Doctorate
In-Service :
D. ANDHY NIRWANTO, B.A., M.A. R.I Deputy of Attorney General
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Prosecutorial Training, 1988 Basic Intelligence Training, 1990 Smuggling Crimes Training, 1991 Corruption Crimes Training, 1992 SEPADYA, 1992 Subversive Crimes Training, 1993 SPAMEN, 1999 Leadership I Training, 2007
Career : SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2011
T
he man born in Kudus, January, 8th, 1956, started in 1981 as District Attorney at Wonogiri District Attorney Office. The currently Grand Attorney (Rank IV/e) had held the position of Head of Intelligence Section at Palangkaraya District Attorney Office prior to his position as Head of General Crimes Section at Demak District Attorney Office and Head of Special Crimes Section at North Jakarta District Attorney Office.
General Office, also Deputy of Head of West Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office, and South Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office. He had been assigned as Director of Law Enforcement Execution & Examination under Junior Attorney General Special Crimes and Inspector for General Supervision under Junior Attorney General Supervision, as well as Head of Provincial Attorney Offices in East Kalimantan and DKI Jakarta.
D. Andhi Nirwanto had held the position as Head of District Attorney Offices in Maros and Centre Jakarta.
Prior to serving the position as Junior Attorney General Special Crime, D. Andhi Nirwanto held the position of Secretary to the Junior Attorney General Special Crime. These days, the Attorney whose hobby is tennis holds the position as RI Deputy of Attorney General.
This Senior Attorney had held the position of Assistant Supervision at West Java Provincial Attorney Office and twice as the Head of Section at R.I Attorney
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
15
Personal Data : Name
: BAMBANG WALUYO, B.A., M.A. Place/Date of Birth : Magetan, July, 12th, 1958 Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/d) Service No. : 19580712 198303 1 001 Registry No. : 6835810 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1982 2. Master of Arts from Faculty of Law, 2002
In-Service :
BAMBANG WALUYO, B.A., M.A.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Law Research, 1983. Prosecutorial Training, 1989. Workload Analysis, 1990. Smuggling Crimes Training, 1991. SPADA, 1994. SPAMEN (1997) Leadership II Training, 2011. National Defense Institution (LEMHANAS), 2013
Junior Attorney General Development
Career : 1. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA X presented by R.I President, 1998 2. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2003 3. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2013
T
he man born in Magetan, July, 12th, 1958 initiated his career at Echelon III as Head of Report and Distribution Section at the Ministry of Law Centre of Law Outreach, Head of Research Section at the Ministry of Law Centre of Law Outreach, General Assistant R.I Attorney General at General Affairs Bureau R.I Attorney General Office, Head of Education And Training Bureau Kepala, Head of Human Resource
16
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Bureau R.I Attorney General Office, Head of Gorontalo District Attorney Office, Director of Law Enforcement Execution & Examination General Crimes Division, Head of Research and Development, Head of Centre Java Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Bureau of Education and Training R.I Attorney General Office. In 2013, he was appointed as Junior Attorney General Development.
Personal Data : Name
: DR. ADJAT SUDRADJAT, B.A., M.A. Place/Date of Birth : Bandung, May, 19th, 1955 Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e) Service No. : 19550519 198203 1 001 Registry No. : 6825534 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1981 2. Master of Management, 2000 3. Doctorate from Faculty of Law, 2013
In-Service : 1. 2. 3. 4.
DR. ADJAT SUDRADJAT, B.A., M.A. Junior Attorney General Intelligence
Prosecutorial Training, 1986 Intelligence Basic Course, 1993 SPAMA, 1996 Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training, 1997 5. SPAMEN, 2001 6. LEMHANAS, 2011
Career : SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2007
T
he man born in Bandung, May, 19th, 1955 initiated his career at Echelon III as the Head of Ketapang District Attorney Office in West Kalimantan, Head of Sumedang District Attorney Office in West Java, Attorney at West Java Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Law Service Sub Directorate, Assistant for Intelligence Section West Java Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Economic and Monetary Security Sub
Directorate, Assessor for Special Crimes, Deputy of Head of Banten Provincial Attorney Office, Inspector IV for General Crimes, Head of South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, General Supervision Inspector under Supervision Division, Secretary for Junior Attorney General General Crimes, and was assigned as Expert Staff for Intelligence. In 2012 he was inaugurated as Junior Attorney General Intelligence.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
17
Personal Data : Name
: A K BASUNI MASYARIF, B.A., M.A Place/Date of Birth : Banten, July, 17th, 1956 Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e) Service No. : 19560717 198509 1 001 Registry No. : 68556105 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1984. 2. Master of Arts from Faculty of Law, 2010.
In-Service : 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
A K BASUNI MASYARIF, B.A., M.A Junior Attorney General General Crimes
T
he man born in Banten, July, 17th, 1956, initiated his career at Echelon III as Head of Sarolangun District Attorney Office in Jambi, Head of Banten District Attorney Office in Banten, Assistant Supervision Section Banten Provincial Attorney Office, Assistant Special Crimes Section West Java Provincial Attorney Office, Deputy of Head of South East
18
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Prosecutorial Training, 1989. Civil and State Administrative Law, 1995. SPAMA, 1999. Leadership II Training, 2006. SESPATI, 2009.
Career : SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2006
Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Head of West Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office, Director of Economy and Financial, Head of North Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office, Inspector IV Junior Attorney General Supervision, Secretary for Junior Attorney General General Crimes, and Expert Staff in Special Crimes before inaugurated in 2013 as Junior Attorney General General Crimes.
Personal Data : Name
: DR. R WIDYO PRAMONO, B.A., M.M, M.A.
Place/Date of Birth : Nganjuk, August, 7th, 1957
Rank/Grade Service No. Registry No. Religion
: : : :
Sebior Attorney (IV/e) 19570807 198503 1 001 6855759 Islam
Education Formal : 1. 2. 3. 4.
Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1984 Master of Management, 2001 Master of Arts from Faculty of Law, 2008 Doctorate, 2012
In-Service :
DR. R WIDYO PRAMONO, B.A., M.M, M.A. Junior Attorney General Special Crimes
1. Prosecutorial Training, 1988 2. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training, 1990 3. Subversive Crimes Training, 1993 4. Law Research, 1993 5. P.4 Type A, 1994 6. Civil and State Administrative, 1995 7. Intellectual Properties, 1997 8. SPAMA, 1999 9. Leadership II Training, 2002 10. LEMHANNAS, 2012
Career : SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2005
T
he man born in Nganjuk, August, 7th, 1957, initiated his career at Echelon III as the Head of Sukabumi District Attorney Office, Head of International Collaboration for Law Enforcement R.I Attorney General Office, Special Assistant for R.I Attorney General, Head of General Affairs Bureau R.I Attorney General Office,
Head of Papua Provincial Attorney Office, Inspector IV for Junior Attorney General Supervision, Head of Centre Java Provincial Attorney Office, Secretary Junior Attorney General General Crimes, and Expert Staff at General Crimes Division prior to his inauguration as Junior Attorney General Special Crimes in 2013.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
19
Personal Data : Name
: DR. ST. BURHANUDDIN, B.A. M.M. M.A. Place/Date of Birth : Cirebon, July, 17th, 1954 Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e) Service No. : 195407171987031001 Registry No. : 687545 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1983. 2. Master of Management, 2001. 3. Doctorate, 2006
In-Service :
DR. ST. BURHANNUDDIN, B.A. M.M. M.A. Junior Attorney General Service Civil and State Administrative
1. Prosecutorial Training (1991) 2. Corruption Crimes Training (1992) 3. Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training (1993) 4. Smuggling Crimes Training (1994) 5. Admininstrative Law Training (1995) 6. Intellectual Right Training (1996) 7. SPAMA (1996) 8. SPAMEN (2003) 9. Leadership II Training (2003) 10. Leadership I Training (2008)
Career : 1. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA X presented by R.I President, 1998. 2. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President, 2007.
T
he man born in Cirebon, July, 17th, 1954, initiated his career at Echelon III as the Head of Bangko District Attorney Office in Jambi, Assistant for General Crimes Section at Jambi Provincial Attorney Office, Assistant for Special Crimes Section at Aceh Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Cilacap District Attorney Office in West Java, Assistant for Supervision at West Java Provincial Attorney Office and Deputy
20
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
of Head of Aceh Provincial Attorney Office, Director Execution and Examination under Junior Attorney General Special Crimes, Head of North Maluku Provincial Attorney Office, Inspector V for Junior Attorney General Supervision, and Head of South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office before his inauguration as Junior Attorney General Civil and State Administrative Law in 2011.
Personal Data : Name
: MAHFUD MANNAN, B.A., M.A. Place/Date of Birth : Barru, October, 15th, 1954 Rank/Grade : Senior Attorney (IV/e) Service No. : 19541015197903 1 001 Registry No. : 6795444 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1978 2. Master of Arts from Faculty of Arts, 2005
In-Service : 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Prosecutorial Training, 1983 Corruption Crimes Training, 1989 SEPADYA, 1992 Strategic Investigation Intelligence Training, 1998 SPAMEN, 2000
Career : MAHFUD MANNAN, B.A., M.A. Junior Attorney General Supervision
T
he man born in Barru, Pctober, 15th, 1954, initiated his career at Echelon III as the Head of Rantau District Attorney Office in South Kalimantan, Assistant for Civil and State Administrative Section at Papua Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Samarinda District Attorney Office in East Kalimantan, Head of Technical & Functional Section at Bureau of Education and Training, Attorney for Junior Attorney General Civil and State Administrative Law, Assistant for Supervision Section at South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Assistant for
1. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XX presented by R.I President 2. SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA XXX presented by R.I President, 2009 3. Amanna Gappa Award from PERSAHI South Sulawesi, 2009
Intelligence Section at South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Junior Inspector Intelligence and Special Crimes, Deputy of Head of Centre Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Deputy of Head of South Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Papua Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Centre Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Head of Education and Training Division R.I Attorney General Office, and Junior Attorney General General Crimes prior to his inauguration as Junior Attorney General Supervision in 2013.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
21
Personal Data : Name : MUHAMMAD SALIM, B.A., M.A. Place/Date of Birth : Klaten, November, 28th, 1956 Rank/Grade : Middle Senior Attorney (IV/D) Service No. : 19561128 198603 1 003 Registry No. : 6865636 Religion : Islam
Education Formal : 1. Bachelor of Arts from Faculty of Law, 1985 2. Master of Arts from Faculty of Law, 2004
In-Service : 1. Prosecutorial Training, 1989. 2. Smggling Crimes Training, 1991. 3. Administration of Civil and General Affairs
MUHAMMAD SALIM, B.A., M.A. Head Ad Interim of Bureau of Education and Training
T
he man born in Klaten, November, 28th, 1956, initiated his career at Echelon III as Head of Tanjung Perak District Attorney Office in East Java, Head of Section for Score Report System Program under Junior Attorney General Intelligence, Head of Sub Directorate Stability and Public Orderliness, Head of North Jakarta District Attorney Office, Special Assistant for R.I Attorney General, Deputy of Head of Centre Java Provincial Attorney Office, Director of
22
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Cases, 1993. 4. SPAMA, 1997. 5. Leadership II Training, 2002. 6. Leadership I Training, 2013.
Career : SATYALANCANA KARYA SATYA X presented by R.I President, 2009
Investigation, Expert Staff, Head of Centre of Research and Development, Head of Legal Bureau and International Relation, Head of Nusa Tenggara Barat Provincial Attorney Office, Head of East Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office and was inaugurated as Secretary of Bureau of Education and Training, and currently holds Head Ad Interim of Bureau of Education and Training R.I Attorney General Office.
CHAPTER III
BUREAUCRATIC REFORM
CHAPTER III
BUREAUCRATIC REFORM
T
o improve the civil servant level of professionalism, the government had announced the obligatory Bureaucratic Reform Program to be implemented by all personnel within the Ministrial/National Institutions level and all of the civil servants throughout Indonesia for Good Governance. The Bureaucratic Reform Program is one of the eleven priorities of national development. Attorney Service had been implementing Bureaucratic Reform Program in different phases since 2008. In 2009, Attorney Service submitted its report on the implementation of phase I of the program to the Minister of Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform, who then assigned an independent committee to evaluate the report. At the end
24
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
of 2009, the Independent Team reported that the bureaucratic reform program was being successfully implemented by the Attorney Service, that was followed by the award of incentives to the personnel within Attorney Service as a part of bureaucratic reform implementation. In general, Bureaucratic Reform Program in Attorney Service was aimed to develop the profile and professional attitude which had the integrity, high level of productivity, responsibility and giving priority of optimal service to the public. The main particular objectives for Bureaucratic Reform Program in Attorney Service encompassed: First, to create Attorney Service as a right size organization that had definite function, Second, to form a high performance and
professional Attorney Service bureaucracy, Third, to develop a comprehensible, effective, efficient and measurable working system, process and procedure as proper to the standard of good governance, Fourth, to create Attorney Service bureaucracy that implemented regulation and deregulation in a proper, orderly and conducive manner, Fifth, to form reliable, competent, professional, high performed, secure, and decent Attorney Service human resource. In 2010, Ministry of Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform issued a new bureaucratic reform implementation guideline for all ministries and/or institutions. Attorney Service adjusted its bureaucratic reform implementation with the new guideline. Based on the Grand Design and Road Map for Bureaucratic Reform 2010 – 2014 (Presidential Regulation No. 81/2010 and Minister of Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform Regulation No. 20/ 2010), every ministries and/or institutions had to implement the reform in 8 areas of: 1
Reform Area I
: Reform Management
2
Reform Area II
: Internal Regulation Management
3
Reform Area III
: Organizational Management
4
Reform Area IV
: Operational Procedure
5
Reform Area V
: Human Resources Management
6
Reform Area VI
: Supervision Development
7
Reform Area VII
: Performance Management
8
Reform Area VIII
: Public Service Development
9
Reform Area VIII
: Monitoring and Evaluation
To further define the 8 Reform Areas, every ministries and/or institutions had to implement almost 40 programs to accomplish 23 performance indicators. Some implementation of Bureaucratic
Reform Program in Attorney Service until 2013 were: REFORM AREA I (Management) : Implemented programs were: a) Established Attorney Service Bureaucratic Reform Directive Team 2013 by R.I Attorney General Directive No.: KEP-011/A/JA/01/2013 dated th January, 28 , 2013 and Establishment of Attorney Service Reform Management Team by R.I Attorney General Directive No.: KEP-1-001/A/JA/01/2013 dated January, 31st, 2013 to improve participation in act of reform; b) Conducted joint meeting between Directive Team and R.I Attorney Service Reform Management Team led by Deputy of Attorney General as the Head of Directive Team, that was followed by a meeting between the Head of Planning Bureau Reform Management Team; c) Conducted Monitoring and Evaluation activity for the implementation of Bureaucratic Reform by the Directive Team and Management Team that encompassed 8 Reform Areas in 5 Provincial Attorney Offices of: West Java Provincial Attorney Office, North Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office, Bengkulu Provincial Attorney Office, East Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office and Bali Provincial Attorney Office participated by each Head of Provincial Attorney Office, the Deputy of Head of Provincial Attorney Office, Asistants, Coordinators, the Head of the District Attorney Offices, the Head of the Branch Attorney Offices, the Heads of Intelligence Sector Sub Division, the Heads of Sections and servicing Attorneys; d) Conducted Envisioning Workshop for Attorney Service Leaders from Echelon I and II to improve commitment on reform and behavioural change;
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
25
e) Revised the 2007 Attorney Code of Conduct in 2012 in order to make it more relevant to the international standard for the drafting of Reform Management Strategy, particularly for ones related to Personnel Code of Conduct. Moreover, Attorney Service had produced Civil Servant Technical Guideline; REFORM AREA II (Management Internal Regulation-Deregulation)
of
Implemented programs were: a) Formed online based database for Attorney Service Regulations that enable every Attorney Service personnel to access available regulations from any computer in any location. b) Conducted review on possible alignment on Legislative Statutory Rules and Regulations, particularly for Attorney Service internal regulations (i.e.: R.I Attorney General Regulation, Circular Letter from R.I Attorney General, Circular Letter of Junior Attorney General, etc.), to see potential 26
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
of overlapping and/or contradictiveness of existing regulations. AREA III OF REFORM (Organizational Management) 1. Formed R.I Attorney Service Workload Analysis and Evaluation on Profession Team in 2013 as stipulated in R.I Attorney General Directive No.: KEP-034/A/ JA/03/2013 dated March, 6th, 2013 to had specific division of tasks and functions for each of the position in Attorney Service, and conducted analysis on workload and evaluation on position to do inquiry on the numbers of Attorney required in each office or task forces throughout Indonesia. Currently, Attorney Service had done analysis on workload and evaluation on position in two Provincial Attorney Offices of Nusa Tenggara Timur Provincial Attorney Office and Papua Provincial Attorney Office, as well as in two District Attorney Offices of Kupang District Attorney Office and Sorong District Attorney Office;
2. Conducted study on right-sizing for the purpose of implementation of Attorney Office organizational rightsizing, as is to be regulated in new R.I Attorney General Directive on Attorney Service Organization and Management that enabled annulment of 3.000 (three thousands) positions; 3. Conducted trainings for personnel in Human Resources Bureau and Junior Attorney General Development to develop an effective Human Resources Unit, and delivered coaching by experts in human resources to Attorney Service personnel. AREA IV Procedure)
OF
REFORM
(Operational
Implemented programs were: a) Developed system for case management database to improve Attorney Service Information and Technology (IT) based management of task accomplishment, that is to be comprised of cases from General Crimes, Special Crimes, Civil and State Administrative, and management of other tasks such as public complaints, etc.; b) Revised existing SOPs for General Crimes, Special Crimes, Civil and State Administrative, and Supervision Divisions. Current tasks of reformatting existing SOP to do proper adjustments on the new guidelines on SOP Drafting issued in 2012 by Minister of Administrative Affairs (Minister of Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform Regulation No. 21/2008 on Guidelines for Formulation of State Administrative SOP that had been succeeded by Minister of Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform Regulation No. 35/2012 on Guidelines for Formulation of State Administrative SOP);
c) Development of key performance indicators (KPI) for IT based task forces; d) Developed Attorney Service Communication Strategy for Education and Anti Corruption Organizational Culture for area of communication strategy for education and anti corruption organizational culture (Strakom PBAK) at Equipment Bureau. REFORM AREA V (Human Resources Management) Implemented programs were: a) Conduction Selection Program Candidates for Participants in Prosecutorial Education and Training (PPPJ) in January 2013 to improve Attorney Service Human Resources Management. The members of the Board of Selection came from independent consultants selected through bidding process for procurement of goods and services in E-Procurement System (LPSE); b) Attorney Service had done assessment on competence for 4.000 officials to be assigned into structural positions in Echelon III and IV, and Specialist Attorneys for Corruption Cases; c) Attorney Service had done assessment on competence for 800 officials to be assigned into structural positions in Echelon III; REFORM AREA Development)
VI
Implemented programs Division were:
(Supervision in
Supervision
a) Application of State Internal Supervision System (SPIP), which essentially was a revision of Close Observation System. Currently, Attorney Service, particularly in Supervision unit, had formed SPIP Task Force Unit and trained the members using the standard modules issued by ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
27
Finance and Development Supervision Agency (BPKP). SPIP Task Force Unit will conduct Diagnostic Assessment for Attorney Service supervisory systems to differentiate between the effectual and ineffectual operations to determine requirements for further development, before drafting a number of technical guidelines for SPIP implementation. b) Anti Corruption programs conducted by Attorney Service based on Presidential Order No. 09/2011 and No. 17/2012. Attorney Service also becomes motivator in the formulation for Statement of Mutual Agreement (SKB) on “whistle blower” between the Head of Police Force and the Attorney General. c) Implementation of E-Procurement System (LPSE) through formation of Procurement Service Unit at each of Provincial Attorney Office. Mandatory trainings for representatives of Attorney Service personnel will be conducted to obtain knowledge on the application of LPSE operation that had been started in every Attorney Offices in January 2013. REFORM AREA Management)
VII
(Performance
Implemented programs were: - Improved Attorney Service performance management through establishment of IT based database for case handling management and development of indictment channel in Attorney Service website. - Extensive public access to information on performance through website improvement to enable public access to the information on case handling management in Attorney Service, and to provide public compaint channel to enable any online submission.
28
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
REFORM AREA VIII (Public Service Development) Implemented programs were: Development of Attorney Service Standard Public Service Regulations (SPP). Furthermore, as an supportive effort to each Attorney Service task force to improve the public service, a team from Attorney Service had assisted assessment on Prime Service (CPP) visit from Ministry of of Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform Public Service Assessor Team to 3 (three) District Attorney Offices of: Denpasar District Attorney Office, Tabanan District Attorney Office and Singaparna District Attorney Office, as well as Centreized assessment done within the Attorney General unit and Centre for Legal Information and Outreach (Puspenkum) working unit. REFORM AREA VIII (Monitoring and Evaluation) Attorney Service had designed the model and mechanism for the implementation of monitoring and evaluation for proper implementation of Bureaucratic Reform Program in accord to Bureaucratic Reform Self Assessment guideline as stipulated in the Minister of Administrative Affairs and Bureaucratic Reform Regulation No. 31/2012 on Guideline for Bureaucratic Reform Self Assessment (PMPRB), and as a realization of the action plan, Attorney Service had disseminated related information and conducted the filing of PMPRB working papers at 25 (twenty five) Provincial Attorney Offices in Indonesia. ATTORNEY SERVICE BUREAUCRATIC REFORM PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MANAGEMENT The Attorney Service initiated the implementation of Bureaucratic Reform Program by employing the structure of Attorney Service Bureaucratic Reform
Program Team. From the phase of program planning the establishment of technical team to implement a certain program was done simultaneously with the implementation. With adequate level of participation the Attorney Service had implemented most of the mandatory programs as stipulated in Minister of Administrative Affairs and
Bureaucratic Reform Regulations. For acceleration of R.I Attorney Service Bureaucratic Reform Program some priority programs strategic activities will be implemented as a part of institutional improvement, that is to be showed in the following Institutional Strategic Map:
R.I ATTORNEY SERVICE INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIC MAP
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
29
CHAPTER IV
PERFORMANCE ACHIEVEMENT
CHAPTER IV
PERFORMANCE ACHIEVEMENT 4.1 DEVELOPMENT
A
lthough the division of Development had no direct contact with the operation of R.I Attorney Service main duties and function which are associated with cases handling management, nevertheless this division had a strategic supportive role to the performance of duties and function of other divisions. To enhance the role of Devlopment division in supporting the performance of other divisions in particular relation to the effort of law enforcement, in 2013 R.I Attorney Service had confirmed the focus for organizing the division of Development that comprised of: provision of reliable Attorney Service personnel, establishment of merit system based Human Resources Development Management, employment
32
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
of IT in the strategy of development and distribution of human resources, good management in finance and State’s Owned Properties, performing arrangement in R.I Attorney Service organizational structure and management as proper to the analysis on workload and position in an effective and efficient manner, increased legal sector collaboration specifically Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA), and adequate provision of proper facilities and infrastructures. On empirical level, in 2013 the Attorney Service had implemented a series of activities of: 1. Organizational Structure and Management a. Established new District Attorney Offices of Tebing Tinggi District
Attorney Office, Lima Puluh District Attorney Office and Boroko District Attorney Office in 2013 based on R.I Attorney General Directive No.: KEP088/A/JA/6/2013 on Organization and Management of Tebing Tinggi District Attorney Office, Lima Puluh District Attorney Office and Boroko District Attorney Office. b. Initiation and establishment of Attorney Service Medical and Forensic Integrated Service Unit (UPT), or known as Adhyaksa Hospital located in Ceger, East Jakarta, Jakarta that was planned to be in fully operation in 2014 as stipulated in R.I Attorney General Regulation No.: Per-20/A/ JA/8/2013 dated August, 14th, 2013 on Organization and Management of Health Service Unit.
The establishment of the health facilities was done in collaboration with Ministry of Health and Jakarta Provincial Health Office with the
objective of supporting the hastening of case handling of medical and/ or forensic based corruption and/or general crime cases. 2. Finance a. Budget Disbursement
2013 2012 R.I Attorney Office Budget Allocation Requisitions (DIPA) valued at IDR 4.347.164.974.000,- (Four Trillion Three Hundred Forty Seven Billion One Hundred Sixty Four Million Nine Hundred Seventy Four Thousand Rupiah), with actual disbursement from the overall R.I Attorney Office work forces dated December 31st, 2013 of IDR 3.835.224.105.476,- (Three Trillion Eight Hundred Thirty Five Billion Two Hundred Twenty Four Million One Hundred Five Thousand Four Hundred Seventy Six Rupiah) or equivalent to 88%.
b. R.I Attorney Service had improved its financial audit result in the Audit
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
33
Board Report from Qualified Opinion (WDP) into Unqualified Opinion With Clarifying Paragraph (WTP DPP). c. Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP)
R.I Attorney Service 2012 PNBP target imposed by Ministry of Finance valued at IDR 109.069.182.094.,- (One Hundred Nine Billion Sixty Nine Million One Hundred Eighty Two Thousand Ninety Four Rupiah) with actual realization of PNBP up to December 2013 of IDR 527.702.962.013,- (Five Hundred Twenty Seven Billion Seven Hundred Two Million Nine Hundred Sixty Two Thousand Thirteen Rupiah) or equivalent to 483,82% from the target.
d. R.I Attorney Service had been working with Finance and Development Supervisory Board (BPKP) to verify and validate the existing credit in 2013 to put in order the Internal Control System in particular to Restitutional Credit, Traffic Ticket Retribution and Court Fees, and Other General Crimes Case Retribution. 3. Legal Development and Establishment a. Conducted Focus Group Discussion (FGD) on Draft of Law for the amendment of Legislation No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service at North Sulawesi Provincial Attorney Office, Bali Provincial Attorney Office, Jambi Provincial Attorney Office, Papua Provincial Attorney Office, West Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office and Gorontalo Provincial Attorney Office. b. International Collaboration: - Signing of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between RI Attorney Service and Thailand Attorney Service on May, 26th - 29th, 2013, in Bali. - Signing of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between RI 34
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Attorney Service and The Kingdom of Thailand Attorney Service on May, 27th, 2013 in Bali. - Conducted extradition handed over of Tomas Toman from the government of Indonesia to the government of Czechoslovakia in Bali, March, 14th – 15th, 2013. 4. Human Resources 2013 Activity and Performance Achievement of Human Resources Bureau were: a. Up date of human resources database in SIMKARI application, as stipulated in Junior Attorney General Development Circular Letter No.: B-126/C/ th Cp.3/06/2013 dated June, 24 , 2013 on Verification on R.I Attorney Service Human Resources Data and Circular Letter No.: B-136/C/Cp.1/07/2013 dated June, 8th, 2013 on Guidelines for R.I Attorney Service Human Resources Data Up Date in SIMKARI Application. b. Conducted selection for R.I Attorney Service recruitment of civil servant candidate (CPNS) in fiscal year 2013. c. Conducted selection for candidates participants in the Attorney Training 2013 with the objective to gather 450 candidates participants in the Attorney Training 2013. d. Conducted the following third party directed Competence Asessments of : - Competence Assessment for structural positions in Echelon III, IV and Specialist Attorneys for Special Crimes participated by 4.115 persons. - Competence Assessment for positions in Echelon III year II participated by 754 persons. - Competence Assessment for structural positions in Echelon IV and Specialist Attorneys for
Corruption Cases fiscal year 2013 year II participated by 1.455 persons. The composition of R.I Attorney Service human resources showed an even dispersal, either based on baik berdasarkan rank/grade
or location. Number of grade III Attorney is 6.607 persons, and grade IV 2.400 persons. In Administrative section 7.072 persons from grade III outnumbered 5.116 persons from grade II.
Table 1 R.I Attorney Offices List of Attorney and Administration Personnel in Indonesia ATTORNEY SEX UNIT/REGION
Grade -3
ADMINISTRATION SEX
Grade - 4
TOTAL
Grade - 1
Grade - 2
TOTAL PERSONNEL
Grade - 3
Grade - 4
ATTORNEY & COMMENT TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
ACEH
186
29
50
9
274
0
1
128
52
173
64
0
0
418
692
SUMATERA UTARA
293
170
74
35
572
0
6
179
90
242
127
0
0
644
1216
SUMATRA BARAT
143
83
42
9
277
0
2
108
89
118
120
1
0
438
715
RIAU
127
56
39
10
232
0
0
77
44
99
77
0
0
297
529
JAMBI
101
49
33
5
188
0
0
88
29
99
56
0
0
272
460
SUMATERA SELATAN
171
99
48
7
325
0
0
132
81
163
83
0
0
459
784
BENGKULU
81
39
30
5
155
0
0
57
34
60
40
0
0
191
346
LAMPUNG
121
89
45
18
273
0
2
110
53
126
75
0
0
366
639
D.K.I JAKARTA
127
71
43
29
270
0
1
105
46
187
94
0
0
433
703
JAWA BARAT
327
198
97
41
663
0
3
262
89
395
169
1
2
921
1584 1619
JAWA TENGAH
311
170
86
35
602
0
2
307
120
347
240
1
0
1017
D.I YOGYAKARTA
70
72
58
43
243
0
0
140
52
147
82
0
0
421
664
JAWA TIMUR
362
194
155
56
767
0
1
251
96
352
203
2
1
906
1673
KALIMANTAN BARAT
127
39
34
5
205
0
0
62
35
75
49
0
0
221
426
KALIMANTAN TENGAH
124
30
39
3
196
0
0
69
25
82
39
0
0
215
411
KALIMANTAN SELATAN
144
46
35
6
231
0
0
89
42
84
55
0
0
270
501
KALIMANTAN TIMUR
148
49
36
4
237
0
1
60
36
74
35
0
0
206
443
SULAWESI UTARA
80
36
24
8
148
0
0
59
48
77
46
0
0
230
378
SULAWESI TENGAH
102
18
26
1
147
0
0
58
18
75
45
0
0
196
343
SULAWESI TENGGARA
75
19
20
2
116
0
0
70
28
72
41
0
0
211
327
SULAWESI SELATAN
213
133
57
24
427
0
0
130
60
187
121
1
0
499
926
BALI
102
74
57
15
248
0
0
70
37
108
67
0
0
282
530
NUSA TENGGARA BARAT
66
36
36
2
140
0
0
60
27
91
48
0
0
226
366
NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR
154
15
29
0
198
0
3
82
54
126
62
0
0
327
525
MALUKU
70
24
23
1
118
0
0
64
43
68
48
0
0
223
341
PAPUA
83
34
26
1
144
0
4
79
40
99
53
0
0
275
419
MALUKU UTARA
65
4
23
1
93
0
0
54
26
25
24
0
0
129
222
BANTEN
102
49
34
11
196
0
1
72
28
96
58
0
0
255
451
KEP. BANGKA BELITUNG
85
22
25
3
135
0
0
49
30
52
37
0
0
168
303
GORONTALO
45
11
12
5
73
0
0
43
40
47
24
1
0
154
227
KEPULAUAN RIAU
85
7
28
3
123
0
0
37
17
44
24
0
0
122
245
ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
184
136
463
127
910
1
6
349
107
467
307
10
9
1256
2166
ON DEPLOYMENT SERVICE
TOTAL
23
9
42
7
81
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
83
4497
2110
1869
531
9007
1
33
3500
1616
4459
2613
16
12
12250
21257
4.2 INTELLIGENCE One of R.I Attorney Service main duties and functions as stipulated in Legislation No. 16/2004 is to safeguard stabilization and public order through a series of activity to raise public awareness, safety measurement for policies of law
enforcement, safety measurement on printed materials, supervision on religious and beliefs movements, and prevention of abuse and/or denigration of religion as conducted by Intelligence division. Other duties of Intelligence division were to support duties and performances of General Crimes, Special
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
35
Crimes, and Civil and State Administrative. R.I Attornes Service Intelligence Division led by Junior Attorney General Intelligence assisted by one Secretary to Junior Attorney General Intelligence dan three Directorates for Technical Issues, Coordinator, and Taskforce Unit, and each regional Head of Intelligence Work Force (in Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices). Technical issues in law enforcement managed by R.I Attorney Service Intelligence Division encompassed: 1. Safeguarding and restoration of state assets and economy, and supporting the performance of General Crimes Division. 2. Prevention, supervision of mass media, printed materials, foreigners, supervision of religious and beliefs movements that included sects, cultural beliefs, religious and cultural mysticisms, occultism, traditional metaphysic healing, clairvoyance, acupuncture, traditional healing practice, metaphysic, and other relevant subject that could endanger public and state, prevention of abuse and/ or denigration of religion, ideology, politic, social, culture, defense and security, state unity, violation on human rights, pursuit and arrest of Attorney Service fugitive, as well as supporting the performances of Development and Supervision Divisions, and other duties as instructed by Junior Attorney General Intelligence. 3. Cryptology, administration and products of Intelligence Division. 2013 performance of Intelligence division were: a. In 2013, the Secretary to Junior Attorney General Intelligence had conducted - Optimal secretariat services for the targeted 12 months of service that
36
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
enabled timely accomplishment and administrative and financial orderliness of all of the main duties and function for investigation (LID), confinement (PAM) and supportive (GAL) programs on intelligence cases in each Directorate and Centre for Legal Information and Outreach. - 100% achievement of 31 (thirty one) activities on Supervision and Performance Evaluation, and Socialization of R.I Attorney General Regulation No.: PER046/A/JA/12/2011 dated December, 28th, 2011 on Integrated SOP for R.I Attorney Service internal affairs case management. - Grading on Intelligence Performance for all of Provincial Attorney Offices in Indonesia. b. In 2013 Directorate I had performed: - 82% achievement of 82 activity reports (LHKs) from the targeted 100 LHKs from Intelligence Operation in the sector of Economics, Finance and Development. - 84% achievement of 42 activity reports (LHKs) from the targeted 50 LHKs from Intelligence Operation in the sector of Economics, Finance and Development. - 88,7% achievement of 71 activities from the targeted 80 activities in Asset Tracing for execution of restitution to R.I Attorney General Office. c. In 2013 Directorate II had performed: - 100% achievement of 50 LHKs in the sector of Politics, Socio Cultural and Organizational Resources within R.I Attorney General Office. - 100% achievement of 4 LHKs for Intelligence Operation in the sector of Supervision on Religious and
Beliefs Movements in Communities. d. In 2013 Directorate III had performed: - 100% achievement of 50 LHKs from the sector of Intelligence Facilities and Products. - 100% achievement of 65 persons/ Supportive Activities for Confinement of R.I Attorney Service Fugitive. e. In 2013 Centre for Legal Information and Outreach had performed: - 100% achievement of completion of 4 activities in Legal Information and Outreach. - Most favourable completion of activities in Media/Facilities for Legal Outreach and Dissemination of Information.
f. In 2013, Intelligence division and sections in Provincial Attorney Offices and District Attorney Offices in Indonesia had performed: - 100% achievement of 632 activity reports from Anti KKN networking activities in Provincial Attorney Offices and District Attorney Offices. - 104,2% achievement of completion of Legal Information in 633 Provincial Attorney Offices and District Attorney Offices from the targeted 608. - 93,3% achievement of Legal Outreach in 362 communities in Provincial Attorney Offices and District Attorney Offices from the targeted 388.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
37
- 120% achievement of 841 reports from Closed Investigation activities from the targeted 700. - 87,4% achievement of 1.228 LHKs from Judicial Intelligence Operation in the sector of Economic and Finance from the targeted 1.405. - 50,2% achievement of 681 activities in Asset Tracing for Execution of Restitution to Provincial Attorney Offices, District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices from the targeted 1.358. Table 2 Recapitulation of Legal Outreach Activities 2013 No
Activities
Frequency
Audience
1
Legal Outreach
632 times
29.268 persons
2
Legal Information
633 times
64.257 persons
g. In 2013 R.I Attorney General Office Intelligence division Center for Monitoring had conducted confinement to suspects, accuseds, and convicts in Attorney Service List of Fugitives as requested by the divisions of Special Crimes and General Crimes, as in the following description: Table 3 Recapitulation of Fugitives Detained by Intelligence Task Force 2013 Suspect
Accused
Convict
Total
25
8
32
65
The following table and graphics would show target and achievement of R.I Attorney General Office Junior Attorney General Intelligence as compiled from actual implementation and 2013 Annual Plan that was created to improve accountability in the performance, quality and quantity of investigation, confinement and support:
Table 4 Intelligence Division 2013 Target and Performance No 1
2
3
38
Responsibility Secretary for Junior Attorney General Intelligence
Activity Other Technical and Management Support Junior Attorney General Intelligence
Performance Conducted supervision on intelligence main working performance in provincial, district and branch Attorney offices Conducted secretariat services
Directorate I Performed (Economic and Restoration of Financial Security) State's Finance and Crimes Controlling
Direcorate II (Socio Politics)
Completed reports from intelligence activities in the sectors of economics, finance and development Completed reports from intelligence operations in the sectors of economics, finance and development Performed Asset Tracing activities Performed activities Completed the report on on Politics, Socio activities on the sectors of Cultural and Politics, Socio Cultural and Organizational Organizational Resources in R.I Resources Attorney General Office Accomplished supervision activities on communities of metaphysics and religious beliefs
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Target
Achievement
%
31 reports
31 reports
100%
12 months
12 months
100%
50 LHKs
42 LHKs
84%
100 LHKs
82 LHKs
82%
80 activities
71 activities
88,7 %
50 LHKs
50 LHKs
100%
4 activities
4 activities
100%
No
Responsibility
Activity
Performance
4.
Directorate III (Intelligence Products)
Performed activities on Intelligence Facilities and Products
5.
Head of Centre Legal Information and Outreach (Kapuspenkum)
Legal Information and Outreach
6.
Heads of Provincial, District and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia
Inquiry/Preventive/ Supportive in Provincial, District and Branch Attorney Offices
Target
Achievement
%
Completed reports on activities 50 LHKs 50 LHKs 100% on Intelligence Facilities and Products Accomplished activities of signal 65 activities 65 activities 100% monitoring Accomplished activities of 12 months 12 months 100% monitoring center Performed activities for Anti KKN 632 reports 632 reports 100% community network in Provincial and District Attorney Offices Performed Legal Information 608 institutions 633 institutions 104,2 % Performed Law Outreach for community
388 communities
362 communities
93,3 %
Completion of reports from closed examination activities
700 reports
841 reports
120%
Completion of reports from intelligence activities (judicial intelligence operation in economy and finance sectors) Performed Asset Tracing activities for the execution of financial restitution of Provincial, District and Branch Attorney Offices
1.405 LHKs
1.228 LHKs
87,4 %
1.358 activities
681 activities
50,2 %
Average Achievement
Graphic 1 2013 Performance of Intelligence Division Target
Achievement 608
31
100
31
Support for Other Technic and Management Junior Attorney General Intelligence
82
50
Activities in Restoration of State Funds and Control of Criminal Acts
50
50
Activities in Politics, Socio Cultural and Organizational Resources
633
50
Activities in Crytology Legal Information and and Intelligence Outreach Products
Graphic 2 2013 Performance of Intelligence Section in Provincial Attorney Offices, District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices Target
Achievement
1405
1358
1228
700
841
Closed Investigation
681
Result of Intelligence Activity (Judicial Intelligence Operation in the Sector of Economic and Finance
Activity of Asset Tracing for Execution of Restitution to Provincial Attorney Offices, District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
39
Table 5 Recapitulation of Attorney General Decisions on Overseas Travel Bans in 2013
No
Requestor
1
R.I Attorney Office Special Crimes Head of Provincial Attorney Offices
2
Number of Overseas Travel Ban Issued
Number of Overseas Travel Ban Extension
Number of Overseas Travel Ban Revoked
Number of Overseas Travel Ban Expired
23
27
1
-
123
63
5
16
3
Police Force
20
4
-
-
4
Others
17
8
-
5
Total
183
102
5
21
4.3 GENERAL CRIMES To perform General Crimes case management, R.I Attorney Service carried out a series of tasks of: pre-prosecution, additional investigation, prosecution, legal actions, enforcement of judicial order dan decisions of final and conclusive effect, examination and supervision to those serving conditional sentence, placed under supervisory orders, released on parole and other legal decisions as stipulated in Legislation, for example to conduct diversion to achieve restorative justice as mandatory additional duties on R.I Attorney Service upon the validation of Legislation No. 11/2012 dated July, 30th, 2012 on Court System for Child Crimes. Related to target performance and government budget allocation, the handling of General Crimes does not belong into category of national priority, therefore this division has neither government mandated specific target nor level of priority within government budget allocation. In spite of exclusion of General Crimes from priority, its nature which provides sense of justice as demanded by the justice enquiring public makes the handling of General Crimes cases to have significant importances in achievement of Attorney Service mission of recovering public trust.
40
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
On the said rationale, in handling of General Crimes cases, the Attorney Service fastened itself to professionalism principles derived from obedience to every in-effect stipulations within legal regulations and put its conscience forward to comply with the sense of justice. Improvement of General Crimes has been done through: (1) a faster, more effective, more efficient, and more controlled case disposal in a professional and proportional manner, (2) ensuring balance in number of cases received and disposal subsequent to result of a more straightforward process of examination, (3) guidelines (criteria) for prosecution of General Crimes to increase the level of public contentment for the sense of justice, (4) delegation of power for important cases prosecution plan, (5) minimize backwards and forwards sending of cases, and backlogs of case investigation commencement warrants (SPDP) and investigation result completion confirmations (P-21). Case Management Performance Performance of General Crimes in case management at the level of Provincial Attorney Offices throughout Indonesia in 2013 would be show in the following table: Period of January to December 2013: conducted 5 executions to death sentenced convicts of:
Table 6 Recapitulation of Case Investigation Commencement Warrants (SPDP) No 1 2 3
Description
No. of SPDP
Outstanding Case period 2012 Incoming Case period January - December 2013 Total Disposal Discontinued by Investigator Forwarded to Stage I Total
18.029 SPDP 129.301 SPDP 147.330 SPDP 851 SPDP 121.765 SPDP 122.616 SPDP
Table 7 Recapitulation of Case Forwarded to Stage 1 No 1 2
3 4
Description
No. of File
Outstanding Case period 2012 Forwarded Case period January - December 2013 Total Disposal Finalized Returned to Investigator (P.18/P.19) Completed Incompleted Retained from Public Attorney Total
24.999 Files 121.765 Files 146.764 Files 105.082 Files 31.757 Files 1.739 Files 2.710 Files 16.918 Files 136.839 Files
Table 8 Recapitulation of Prosecution Stages Activities (APB/APS) General Crime Cases No 1 2
3
Description
No. of Case
Outstanding Case period 2011 Forwarded Cases period January - December 2012 Total Finalized Forwarded to other institutions Process Cancelled by law Forwarded to District Court with APN Forwarded to District Court with APS Total
a. On May, 17th, 2013, Directorate of Criminal Acts against Man and Possession has executed: 1. SURYADI SWABHUANA a.k.a. ADI KUMIS a.k.a. DODI BIN SOEKARNO 2. JURIT BIN ABDULLAH 3. IBRAHIM BIN UJANG (SOUTH
2.400 Cases 109.072 Cases 111.472 Cases 1.869 Cases 26 Cases 106.792 Cases 1.507 Cases 110.194 Cases
SUMATERA ATTORNEY OFFICE)
PROVINCIAL
b. Directorate of Other General Crimes Acts 1. On March, 14th, 2013 Banten Provincial Attorney Office has executed the convict of narcotics case on name of ADAMI WILSON a.k.a ADAM a.k.a ABU,. ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
41
2. On Monday, November, 17th, 2013, Banten Provincial Attorney Office has executed the convict of narcotics case on name of MUHAMMAD ABDUL HAFEEZ, 44 years old.
Period of January – December 2013, death sentence were delivered to 133 convicts, with description on type of criminal actions as in the following table:
Table 9 Recapitulation of Death Sentences Disaggregated by Criminal Acts 2013 No
Criminal Acts
Number of Convicts
Comments
1
2
3
4
1 2 3
Narcotics Terrorism Homicide Total
73 Persons 2 Persons 73 Persons 148 Persons
Other General Crime Acts State Security and Public Order Man and Possession
General Crimes performance in case handling management in each directorate is : Table 10 Case Disposal Per-Directorate DIR OHARDA (Man & Possession)
DIR KAMNEG & TIBUM
DIR TPUL
TOTAL
Pre Execu Pre Execu Pre Execu Pre Execu ProsProsProsProsProstion & Prostion & Prostion & Prostion & ecuecuecuecuecuExami- ecuExami- ecuExami- ecuExamition tion tion tion tion nation tion nation tion nation tion nation Target
100
100
100
80
80
80
310
310
310
490
490
490
Achievements
47
20
12
104
81
47
598
475
280
749
576
339
%
47%
20%
12%
130% 101%
59%
193% 153%
90%
153% 118%
69%
Table 11 General Crime Case Disposal Performance 2013 KEJAGUNG
42
Provincial, District & Sub-District Attorney Offices
Pre Prosecution
Prosecution
Execution & Examination
Target
490
490
490
138.465
Achievements
749
576
339
148.689
%
153%
118%
69%
107%
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Graphic 3 2013 Case Management Performance R.I Attorney General Office General Crimes Target
Achievement
749 576
490
490
490 339
Pre-Prosecution
Prosecution
Execution & Examination
Graphic 4 2013 General Crimes Performance in Provincial Attorney Offices, District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices Target
Achievement 148,689
138,465
Target
Achievement
Table 12 Recapitulation of General Crimes Case Disposal Case Disposal No
Criminal Acts
1
Forestry (Illegal Logging)
2
Environmental
3
Narcotics
4
Incoming Cases
On Trials
Disposal Rate (%) Court Sentenced
1.202
386
73
38,19 %
141
11
0
7,8 %
17.791
5.996
999
39,32%
Psychotropics
751
378
7
51,26 %
5
Unauthorized Mining
411
185
28
51,82 %
6
Trafficking
188
118
2
63, 83 %
7
Child Protection
4.593
1.795
270
44,96 %
8
Immigration
83
21
7
33,73 %
9
Food and Drugs
185
37
18
29,73 %
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
43
Criminal Acts
10
Firearms and Explosives
709
214
11
Domestic Violence
953
311
52
38,09 %
12
Homicide
659
305
69
56,75 %
13
Oil and Gas
375
185
22
55,2 %
14
Conservation of Natural Resources
68
14
15
42,65 %
15
Terrorism
19
38
5
226, 32 %
16
Cyber Crime
19
8
0
42,11 %
17
Common Crimes
1.645
547
99
39,27 %
18
Tax
10
3
0
30 %
19
Misappropriation
2.229
835
163
44,77 %
20
Violence
496
210
38
50 %
21
Larceny with affliction
8.476
3.241
439
43,42 %
22
Larceny with violence
1.656
438
86
31,64 %
23
Sexual Assault
283
84
14
34,63%
24
Extortion
213
94
22
54,46 %
25
Health
795
465
19
60,88 %
26
Intellectual Rights
65
33
6
60 %
27
Oil and Gas Distribution
660
193
36
34,97 %
Policies for Management
Improvement
Incoming Cases
Case Disposal
No
of
Case
In order to capitalize on case management, Junior Attorney General General Crimes increased collaboration and coordination through direct or indirect facilitation for case management related Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) or Mutual Agreement between R.I Attorney General Office with other Ministries/Institutions. Some established MoU were as follow: 1. Mutual Agreement between R.I Electoral Supervision Board, R.I Police Force and R.I Attorney Service No. 01/ NKB/BAWASLU/I/2013 No. B/02/I/2013 No.: KEP-005/A/JA/01/2013 on Law Enforcement Integrated Centre. 2. MoU between R.I Ministry of Finance, R.I Ministry of Forestry, R.I Ministry of Environment, R.I Attorney General,
44
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
On Trials
Disposal Rate (%) Court Sentenced 21 33, 15 %
The Head of R.I Police Force, The Head of Anti Corruption Commission (KPK), The Head of Centre for Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis (PPATK) on Guidelines for Multi Door Approach in Natural Resources, Beyond Forest and Swamp Ecosystem Case Management. Recapitulation of Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP)
- Retribution from Fines and
Insubstantial Cases : IDR 162.256.826.504,-
- Court Fees for Fines and Insubstantial Cases : IDR 9.067.282.806,-
- Auctions and Forfeited Money :
IDR 26.395.821.204,Total: IDR 197.719.930.514,-
Below is the recapitulation of Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP):
Table 13 Recapitulation of Non-Tax State Revenues (PNBP) Fines and Insubstantial Cases
Rp. 162.256.826.504.-
Court Fees on Fines and Insubstantial Cases
Rp.
9.067.282.806.-
Auctions and Forfeited Money
Rp.
26.395.821.204.-
TOTAL
Rp. 197.719.930.514.-
4.4 SPECIAL CRIMES Anti corruption is one of the government defined priorities within the sector of politics, law and order. To carry on the duties, Attorney Service entrusted the said responsibility to the division of Special Crimes that does not restricted to the corruption case management only but also in managing the cases of other Special Crimes (i.e.: Money Laundering, Exclusive Economy Zone [ZEE], Fishery, Customs and Excise). For the handling of corruption cases that was defined as a national priority, R.I Attorney Service had done a series of organization for both sides of policy and practice of anti corruption law enforcement implementation. On the side of policy, since 2013 R.I Attorney Service has established target on quality of Corruption Crimes case handling management, mapping on corruption vulnerable government sectors, and created a number of practical guidelines and manuals to ease on site implementation of technical duties. On the practical side, R.I Attorney Service has attempted to provide the budget requirement for corruption cases handling management that was based on actual cost system. R.I Attorney Service is fully aware of the fact that quantitative aspect could not be the sole target indicator for the capitalization on performance of Special Crimes division, hence R.I Attorney Service put on the condition of quality improvement for the corruption cases
handling management, from the phase of investigation, examination, prosecution up to execution, to give the effort of eradication of corruption not only the inclination in number of case but also the recognition on the quality of the handling process as well as of the type of the case being handled, both from the aspects of technical, intellectual level of the perpetrator, modus operandi, impact and the loss suffered by state financial. The current trend in the effort of eradication of corruption is not only to perform legal action to the perpetrators, but also must be able to restore the loss suffered by state financial. Therefore, it was expected that the investigators and examinators have the capabilities to trace the wealth and asset of the perpetrators as well as conducting the seize to be put as the evidence to be considered for restitutional charge. The leaders on the central level have employed steps of improvement in terms of delegation of power to the Heads of Provincial Attorney Offices and Heads of District Attorney Offices as the regional leaders for taking the rein in handling of corruption cases, with the objective to gain faster pace in handling of corruption case by means of cutting the long bureaucratic line without neglecting the values from local wisdom and put conscience forward by means of delivering proper report of the implementation to the higher leaders.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
45
Throughout 2013, Special Crimes division (at the level of R.I Attorney General Office, Provincial Attorney Offices, District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices) has investigated 1.709 cases, examined 1.653 cases, prosecuted 2.023 cases, and restoring IDR 403.102.000.215,- (Four
Hundred Three Billion One Hundred Two Million Two Hundred Fifteen Rupiah) and USD $ 500.000,00 (Five Hundred Thousand US Dollar). The following graphics showed the performance of case handling:
Table 14 Special Crimes Cases Disposal Performance in 2013 Provincial, District, & Branch Attorney Offices
R.I Attorney General Office
ProsecuExecution ExecuProsecu- tion of & ExamiProstion & tion of Substannation of ecution ExamiEconomy tial VioEconomy of Cornation & lation on & ruption of CorOther Human Other SpeCases ruption Cases Rights cial Crimes Cases Cases Cases
LID
DIK
Prosecution of Corruption Cases
0
1.350
1.350
1.350
282
85
0
1.614
1.568
1.923
262
100%
0%
LID
DIK
Target
80
80
80
1
1
85
Achievements
95
85
100
0
0
0%
0%
%
46
118,75% 106,25% 125%
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Prosecution of Economy & Other Special Crimes Cases
119,55% 116,68% 142,44%
90%
Graphic 5 2013 Performance of R.I Attorney General Office Special Crimes Cases Handling Target 95 80
80
85
80
Achievement 85 85
75
1
0
1
Investigation Examination Prosecution Prosecution of of Corruption of Corruption of Corruption Economy and Cases Cases Cases Other Special Crimes Cases
0
0
0
Prosecution Execution and Execution and of Substantial Examination Examination Violation of of Corruption of Economy Human Right Cases and Other Cases Special Crimes Cases
Graphic 6 2013 Performance of Special Crimes Case Handling at Provincial Attorney Offices, District Attorney Offices and Branch Attorney Offices Target
Achievement 1.923
1.350
1.614
1.350
1.568
1.350
282 Investigation of Corruption Cases
Examination of Corruption Cases
Prosecution of Corruption Cases
262
Prosecution of Economy and Other Special Crimes Cases
Table 15 Attorney General Office Special Crimes Cases Disposal Performance Target and Ahievements 2013 No
Activity
1
Quality Improvement in Investigations and Examinations in Corruption Case Disposal Disposal and Completion of Corruption, Other Special Crimes, and Substantial Violation on Human Rights Cases.
2
Target
Achievement
%
A. Investigation : 80 Cases
95 Cases
118,75 %
B. Examinations : 80 Cases
85 Cases
106,25%
A. Prosecution of Corruption Case : 80 Cases B. Prosecution of Economy and Other Special Crimes Cases : 45 Cases C. Prosecution of Substantial Violation on Human Rights Cases : 1 Cases
100 Cases
120 %
0 Cases
0%
0 Cases
0%
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
47
No 3
Activity Control on Execution and Examination Functions.
Target
Achievement
%
A. Execution and Examination of Corruption Crime Cases : 80 Cases B. Execution and Examination of Economy and Other Special Crimes Cases : 45 Cases
80 Cases
100 %
0 Cases
0%
Table 16 Case Disposal Performances at Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia Target and Achievement No 1
2
Activity
Target
Quality Improvement in Investigations and Examinations in Corruption Case Disposal Disposal and Completion of Corruption, and Other Special Crimes Cases.
Achievement
%
A. Investigation : 1.350 Cases
1.614 Cases
119,55%
B. Examination : 1.350 Cases
1.568 Cases
116,68%
A. Prosecution of Corruption Cases : 1.350 Cases
1.923 Cases
142,44 %
T.P. Fisheries/ZEE = 121 Cases T.P. Customs = 50 Cases T.P. Excise = 19 Cases Total = 190 Cases
90 %
B. Prosecution of Economy & Other Special Crimes Cases : 282 Cases
The following table showed recapitulation of 2013 Corruption Cases in Indonesia 2013 Phases of Investigation, Examination and Prosecution: Table 17 Recapitulation of Corruption Cases in Indonesia 2013 Phases of Investigation (LID), Examination (DIK) and Prosecution (TUT)
No.
Task Force
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
R.I Attorney General Office
95
85
59
31
IDR 52.190.200.000 USD 500.000
2
Aceh
32
35
18
22
IDR
2.926.988.356
3
North Sumatera
210
101
59
46
IDR
2.802.884.000
4
West Sumatera
37
48
44
11
IDR
482.309.747
5
Riau
39
28
52
48
IDR
4.295.459.451
6
Jambi
38
64
27
16
IDR
182.334.200
7
South Sumatera
82
34
32
35
IDR
2.879.096.689
8
Bengkulu
34
35
28
21
IDR
2.410.941.188
9
Lampung
49
25
55
29
IDR
5.298.197.821
10 Jakarta
36
25
55
43
IDR 111.685.408.353
11 West Java
99
82
90
38
IDR 13.454.139.118
12 Centre Java
111
132
106
48
IDR 36.276.922.866
13 Yogyakarta
18
20
38
13
IDR
48
Number of DIK
Prosecution DIK AtDIK torney Police Service Force
Number of LID
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Restored State Funds Phases of DIK and TUT 7
2.111.394.590
8
Prosecution DIK AtDIK torney Police Service Force 56 35
Number of LID
Number of DIK
14 East Java
128
119
15 Bali
34
24
15
16 Nusa Tenggara Barat
28
28
17 Nusa Tenggara Timur
31
18 West Kalimantan
49
19 Centre Kalimantan
No.
Task Force
Restored State Funds Phases of DIK and TUT IDR
4.894.918.536
6
IDR
1.000.000.000
23
20
IDR
110.669.984
73
46
22
IDR
2.026.841.410
25
19
10
IDR
2.311.076.613
32
42
22
34
IDR
1.445.722.246
20 South Kalimantan
27
56
28
25
IDR
3.474.713.036
21 East Kalimantan
43
58
29
24
IDR
5.707.851.700
22 North Sulawesi
33
36
19
19
IDR
1.393.259.845
23 Centre Sulawesi
43
55
38
20
IDR
2.051.886.024
24 South East Sulawesi
53
29
30
23
IDR
5.455.641.200
25 South Sulawesi
165
128
71
52
IDR 99.873.093.162
26 Maluku
28
33
28
9
IDR
27 Papua
22
13
59
0
IDR 22.000.000.000
28 Banten
26
31
24
27
IDR
1.161.421.210
29 Bangka Belitung
20
35
13
19
IDR
863.497.228
30 Gorontalo
18
18
23
12
IDR
6.063.353.668
31 North Maluku
16
38
20
4
IDR
3.610.874.545
32 Riau Islands
20
31
17
8
IDR
574.983.610
1.696
1.646
1.243
770
TOTAL
2.085.919.819
IDR 403.102.000.215 USD 500.000
Acheivement Year 2013 :
a. Investigation Table 18 Investigation Performed in 2013 No
Work Force
Target
Achievements
Percentage
80
85
106,25 %
1
Attorney General Office
2
Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia
1.350
1.568
116,15 %
TOTAL
1.430
1.653
115,59 %
Target
Achievement
Percentage
80
100
125 %
b. Prosecution Table 19 Prosecution Performed in 2013 No
Work Force
1
Attorney General Office
2
Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia
1.350
1.923
142,44 %
TOTAL
1.430
2.023
141,47 %
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
49
c. Recovered State Funds Table 20 Recovered State Funds in 2013 No
Work Force
Amount
1
Attorney General Office
IDR 52.190.200.000.+ USD 500.000
2
Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices in Indonesia
IDR 350.911.800.215.IDR 403.102.000.215.+ USD 500.000
TOTAL
R.I Attorney Service duties and responsibilities in the implementation of R.I Presidential Order No. 1/2013 on Acceleration for Eradication of Corruption encompassed: a. Improvement of efforts for examination and prosecution against corruption crimes cases to sentence the perpetrator and to restore State Funds.; b. Prevention of and to deliver severe sanction to abuse of powers in law
enforcement done by Plaintiff/Public Attorney; c. Increased collaboration with R.I Police Force, Finance and Development Supervision Agency, Centre for Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis, and other relevant other relevant state institutions for law enforcement and recovery of state wealth loss due to corruption.
Table 21 R.I Attorney Service Achievement in Management of Corruption Case Disposal No
Year
Examination
Prosecution
1
2011
1.515 Cases
1.217 Cases
2
2012
1.401 Cases
1.511 Cases
3
2013 (Target/Estimation)
1.430 Cases
1.430 Cases
4
2014 (Target/Performance Plan)
1.380 Cases
1.380 Cases
Restoration of State’s Finance: - IDR 403.102.000.215,- (Four Hundred Three Billion One Hundred Two Million Two Hundred Fifteen Rupiah). - US$. 500.000,(Five Thousand US Dollar). Public Appealing Handling in 2013:
Hundred
Corruption
Case
1. Exection of R.I Supreme Court Verdict No.: 899K/Pid.sus/2012 dated November 22nd, 2012 on convicted Gen.
50
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Com Pol. (Ret) Drs. SUSNO DUADJI, BA. MA. M.Sc.
Accomplishment of execution:
By persuasive means, the execution of convicted Gen.Com Pol. (Ret) Drs. SUSNO DUADJI, BA. MA. M.Sc. was accomplished on May, 2nd, 2013 at 23.10 WIB in Class II Cibinong penitentiary.
2. Execution of R.I Supreme Court Verdict No.: 161K/Pid.sus/2012 dated April, 10th, 2012 on convicted THEDDY TENGKO.
Accomplishment of execution :
3) Legal Opinion
By coordination with Danrem 151 Binaiya Kodam XVI Pettimura, on May, 29th, 2013 at 14.25 WIT, Executor Team succeeded in the arrest of the convict THEDDY TENGKO at Rar Gwarmar airport, Dobo, to be executed in Ambon penitentiary.
4.5 CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
STATE
As stipulated in Legislation No. 16/2004 on R.I Attorney Service, besides the power of criminal case handling, R.I Attorney Service was also has the power to conduct law enforcement on State Civil and State Administrative Affairs. To perform the main duties and functions of the power, R.I Attorney Service Civil and State Administrative Affairs arranged three structures of directorates, each led by Director of Civil, Director of State Administrative, and Director of Restoration and Protection on Rights. Each Directorate divided the power into five sections of: (1) Law Enforcement, (2) Legal Assistance (State Advocation), (3) Legal Opinion, (4) Law Service, and (5) Other Legal Actions. 2013 achievement of Civil and State Administrative Affairs were: a. Duties and power of Civil and State Administrative Affairs. 1) Law Enforcement
No case registered throughout 2013. Activity of Law Enforcement here is limited to Attorney Service effort in completion of restitution paid by corruption convicts under Law No. 3/1971.
2) State Advocacy
In 2013, State Advocacy by State Attorney representing the government at national and regional levels (by litigation) reached 2.961 cases (by litigation).
In 2013, Legal Opinion activity reached 468 dossiers comprised of the activity of delivering Legal Opinion and implementation of Legal Assistance.
4) Legal Service
In 2013 Legal Service activity reached 358 cases.
5) Other Legal Actions
In 2013, activity in Other Legal Actions (particularly as mediator) reached 2 cases.
b. Recovery and Restoration of State Funds. 1) In 2013 at central level (R.I Attorney General Office) recovered State Funds was amounted to IDR 32.742.960.000,00,- (Thirty Two Billion Seven Hundred Forty Two Million Nine Hundred Sixty Thousand Rupiah) whereas restoration of State Funds was amounted to IDR 85.904.081.238,00,(Eighty Five Billion Nine Hundred Four Million Eighty One Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Eight Rupiah). 2) In 2013, State Funds recovered at the level of Provincial and District Attorney Offices throughout Indonesia amounted to IDR 1.182.794.121.105,90 (One Trillion One Hundred Eighty Two Billion Seven Hundred Ninety Four Million One Hundred Twenty One Thousand One Hundred Five Rupiah And Ninety Cents) and land of ±13.250 M2. Restoration of State Wealth amounted to IDR 62.843.998.028,03 (Sixty Two Billion Eight Hundred Forty Three Million Nine Hundred Ninety Eight Twenty Eight Rupiah And Three Cents), making the total of recovered and restored State Funds in 2013 amounted to IDR 1.364.276.160.371,93 (One Trillion Three Hundred Sixty Four Billion Two Hundred Seventy Six Million One ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
51
Hundred Sixty Three Hundred Seventy One Rupiah And Ninety Three Cents) and land of ±13.250 M2.
Hundred Eighty Five Million Nine Hundred Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Twelve Rupiah And Ninety Eight Cents) from the total target of IDR 7.404.999.848.421,06 (Seven Trillion Four Hundred Four Billion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Million Eight Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Four Hundred Twenty One Rupiah And Six Cents).
3) Restitution Payment.
In 2013, achievement of restitution payment claimed by Civil and State Administrative as stipulated in Legislation No. 3/1971 reached 14,44% or equal to IDR 1.069.385.915.712,98 (One Trillion Sixty Neine Billion Three
Some
following
collaboration
were
Table 22 Recovered and Restored State Funds/Wealth* No
Activity
Amount
1
Recovered (Civil cases)
IDR 1.215.537.081.105,90 and land measured 13.250 m2
2
Restored (Restitution cases)
IDR 148.739.079.266,03
TOTAL
52
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
• •
IDR 1.364.276.160.371,93 13.250 m2 land
Table 23 Civil and Administrative Target and Achievement in 201 No
Activity
Target case/activity
Achievement
%
1
Improvement in civil cases
60
62
103%
2
Improvement in state administrative cases
40
65
162%
3
Improvement in restitution cases
80
102
128%
4
Sub Total Improvement in civil, administrative, and restitution cases at Provincial, District, and Branch Attorney Offices
180 1272
229 3574
127% 280,97%
Total / Average Achievement
1452
3803
262%
Graphic 7 Civil and Administrative Case Ligation in 2013 Target
Achievement 3.803
3.574
1.452
1.272 229
180
General Attorney
Provincial, District, & Branch Prosecutors Offices
Total
Table 24 Completion of Case Directorate
Law Enforcement
State Advocation
Legal Opinion
Legal Service
Other Legal Actions
Total
Total
-
2961
468
358
1
3788
Table 25 Achievement in 2013 Civil and Administrative Activity Description
No
Attorney Office
Law Enforcement
Litigation
Nonlitigation
A
Attorney General Office
-
84
1
KT – N. A. D
-
2
KT – SUMUT
-
Other Total Legal Actions
Legal Opinion
Legal Service
Total
27
111
92
10
-
213
-
6
6
-
-
-
-
9
1
10
36
4
-
50
State Advocation
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
53
Civil and Administrative Activity Description
No
Attorney Office
Law Enforcement
Litigation
Nonlitigation
Other Total Legal Actions
Legal Opinion
Legal Service
Total
State Advocation
3
KT – SUMBAR
-
11
-
11
7
20
-
38
4
KT – RIAU
-
8
14
22
72
44
-
138
5
KT – JAMBI
-
8
45
53
5
8
-
66
6
KT – SUMSEL
-
5
17
22
2
2
-
26
7
KT – BENGKULU
-
3
51
54
-
-
-
54
8
KT – LAMPUNG
-
7
2
9
-
3
-
12
9
KT – DKI JAKARTA
-
-
765
765
-
-
-
765
10 KT – JAWA BARAT
-
19
110
129
10
22
161
11 KT – JAWA TENGAH
-
15
20
35
11
42
1
88
12 KT – D.I. Y
-
5
6
11
-
23
-
34
13 KT – JAWA TIMUR
-
19
280
299
23
29
-
351
14 KT – KALBAR
-
9
10
19
-
17
-
36
15 KT – KALTENG
-
17
4
21
4
9
-
34
16 KT – KALSEL
-
5
-
5
12
12
-
29
17 KT – KALTIM
-
6
19
25
-
-
-
25
18 KT – SULUT
-
33
53
86
8
-
-
94
19 KT – SULTENG
-
2
5
7
-
8
-
15
20 KT – SULSEL
-
7
828
835
44
19
-
898
21 KT – SULTRA
-
4
-
4
-
-
-
4
22 KT – B A L I
-
6
27
33
-
6
-
39
23 KT – N T B
-
12
42
54
-
31
-
85
24 KT – N T T
-
18
1
19
-
-
-
19
25 KT – MALUKU
-
3
2
5
-
-
-
5
26 KT – PAPUA
-
13
40
53
13
17
-
83
27 KT – MALUT
-
7
4
11
-
11
-
22
28 KT – GORONTALO
-
1
198
199
-
-
-
199
29 KT – BABEL
-
6
26
32
-
2
-
34
30 KT – BANTEN
-
4
7
11
126
7
-
144
31 KT – KEP. RIAU
-
5
-
5
3
12
-
20
-
351
2610
2961
468
358
1
3788
TOTAL
established to improve the performance of Junior Attorney General Civil and State Administrative: a. Mutual Agreement between PT Dok & Perkapalan Kodja Bahari (Persero) with
54
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 004/I/KONTR/ DKB/2013 – No : B-001/G/Gs.1/01/2013 dated January, 8th, 2013.
b. Mutual Agreement between PT Kawasan Berikat Nusantara (Persero) with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 01/ MOU/DRT/1/2013 – No : B-054/G/ Gs.1/01/2013 dated January, 29th, 2013.
h. Mutual Agreement between PT. Krakatau Steel (Persero) with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.:: 12/DU-KS/ Kontr/2013 – No : 317/G/Gs.1/09/2013 dated September, 4th, 2013.
c. Mutual Agreement between PT Djawatan Angkoetan Motor Repoeblik Indonesia (Persero) with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 20/HK.203/DU2013 – No : B-078/G/Gs.1/02/2013 dated February, 6th, 2013.
i. Mutual Agreement between PT. Perkebunan Nusantara II with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 20/MoU/01/ IX/2013 – No : B-335/G/Gs.1/09/2013 dated September, 20th, 2013.
d. Mutual Agreement between Board of Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: KS.301/008/KB/II/2013 – No : B-103/G/ Gs.1/02/2013 dated February, 27th, 2013.
j. Mutual Agreement between The National Gas Company/PT. Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 057400.MoU/HK.02/UT/2013 – No : B-369/G/Gs.1/10/2013 dated October, 18th, 2013.
e. Mutual Agreement between PT. Jamsostek (Persero) with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: MoU/32/04/2013 – No.: B-171/G/Gs.1/04/2013 dated April, 22nd, 2013.
k. Mutual Agreement between PT. TELKOM (Persero) Tbk with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: K.TEL.212/HK.840/UTA-00/2013 – No : B-393/G/Gs.1/11/2013 dated November, 8th, 2013.
f. Mutual Agreement between Republic of Indonesia Ministry of Trade with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 470/SJ-DAG/ SD/5/2013 - No.: B-194/G/Gs.1/05/2013 dated May, 8th, 2013.
l. Mutual Agreement between PT. TIMAH (Persero) Tbk with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 049/TBK/NKB-0000/2013-B1 – No : B-442/G/Gs.1/12/2013 dated December, 23rd, 2013.
g. Mutual Agreement between PT. Lembaga Pengelola Dana Bergulir Koperasi dan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (LPDB-KUMKM) with Attorney Service on handling of legal affairs in the sector of Civil and State Administrative No.: 008/MoU/ LPDB/2013 – No : 285/G/Gs.1/07/2013 dated July, 31st, 2013.
4.6 INTERNAL AND SUPERVISION
EXTERNAL
To perform a clean Attorney Service Bureaucratic Management, enhancement for supervisory role is absolutely required to establish accountable performance of human resources and the Attorney Service as an institution since the aspects of individual
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
55
Graphic 8
integrity with accountable performance of the institution are crucial elements for the successful performance of the institution.
Complain Reports in 2013
In accord to the importance of enhancement for supervisory role particularly in the sector of law and personnel, R.I Attorney Service had established the practical attempt to enhance supervisory role within the scale of priority. Management and completion of complaints reports in Junior Attorney General Supervision was managed by 5 (five) Inspectors of: (a) Inspector I, (b) Inspector II, (c), Inspector III, (d) Inspector IV, (e) Inspector V. 760 complaints reports was received in 2013 that was added with 413 remaining ones from 2012, making the total sum of 1.173 complaints reports. As a follow up, at the end of 2013, 778 complaints reports were completed, with 109 complaints reports were declared “verified” whereas 669 were declared “unverified” that made 33,67% rate of reports completion.
56
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
1.173
778
Complaints
Public reports:
appealing
Completion
2013
complaints
a. News reported on electronic media SINDONEWS.com with the headline of Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office rebutted the allegation of bribery in the handling of PT. Master Steel tax crime case.
Upon the news coverage, Junior Attorney General Supervision
conducted the attempt of clarification as stipulated in Junior Attorney General Supervision Order No.: Print-133/H/Hjw/07/2013 dated July, 19th, 2013, with the result that the news reported on electronic media SINDONEWS.com did not require to be follow up with inspection on case due to lack of preceding evidence for the presumption of indiscipline act that might alter should other data and new fact are found in the future.
Narcotics Owners”, which reported the improperly mild demand done by Attorney Diah Ayu, BA, at Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office to convicted SUNIL LAUNGANI and convicted Hardy Arga Ciputra a.k.a Kiting et.al in case handling of Narcotics and Psychotropics crime of possession of 598 ecstasy pills. Clarification to the news as stipulated in Junior Attorney General Supervision Order No.: PRIN--298/H/Hjw/08/2013 dated August, 16th, 2013, resulted in the conclusion that the news coverage did not require to be follow up with inspection on case due to lack of preceding evidence for the presumption of indiscipline act that might alter should other data and new fact are found in the future.
a. Indication of indisciplier act of refraining from submittal of appeal done by Attorneys at Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office and East Jakarta District Attorney Office in relation to the handling of PT. Genta tax crime case.
Related to this indication, an inspection to the case were carried out as stipulated in Junior Attorney General Supervision Order No.: Print-132/H/Hjw/07/2013 dated July, 19th, 2013. Result deduced from data and facts found during the inspection of the tax crime case involving PT. GENTA DUNIA JAYA RAYA revealed that Plaintiff/ Public Attorney ALBERTINUS P NAPITUPULU, BA.MA, et.al (Head of Legal Information and Outreach Section Jakarta Provincial Attorney Office) has been proven performing indiscipline act of unreliable, irregular, inaccurate and indifferent attitudes in working for the state interest as stipulated in Government Regulation No.: 53/2010 Article 3 Point 9.
b. Printed headline of Dialog newspaper titled “Improper Lawsuit Issued by Provincial Attorney Office to
c. News on website www.detik.com titled “Attorney Reported to Police for Striking Handgun at Serpong Petrol Station”, Tuesday, September, 3rd, 2013, that reported MP, an Attorney from Tigaraksa District Attorney Office who was reported to Serpong Police Station for threatening gesture of striking a handgun.
Clarification through functional inspection to the case proved indiscipline act to Government Regulation No.: 53/2010 Article 3 point 6 that resulted in medium level of disciplinary sanction of 1 Rank Demotion for one year as stipulated in Government Regulation No.: 53/2010 Article 7 point 3.c.
Recapitulation of Complaints Reports in 2013 as follow:
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
57
Table 26 Recapitulation of Accomplishment on Complaints Reports in 2013 Outstanding Incoming Complaints Complaints Reports Reports in per Dec 2012 2013
Total Complaints Reports
Finalization Total
In Progress
124
174
154
15
139
154
57
220
8
149
157
63
172
213
22
161
183
30
68
133
201
14
96
110
91
413
760
1173
109
669
778
395
No
Inspector
1.
Inspector l
153
175
328
50
2.
Inspector II
34
177
211
3.
Inspector III
117
103
4.
Inspector IV
41
5.
Inspector V Number
Legitimate Illegitimate
Table 27 Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions Imposed on Attorney Service Officials in Indonesia by Grade in 2013
58
No
Grade
Administrative
Prosecutorial
Total
1. 2. 3. 4.
GRADE I GRADE II GRADE III GRADE IV TOTAL
0 58 45 0 103
0 0 134 34 168
0 58 179 34 271
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Table 28 Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions imposed on Attorney Service Officials in Indonesia by Type of Punishment in 2013 No
Grade
Administrative
Prosecutorial
Total
1. 2. 3.
MILD MEDIUM SEVERE Total
11 61 31 103
75 75 18 168
86 136 49 271
Table 29 Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions imposed on Attorney Service Officials in Indonesia by Type of Violation in 2013 No
Grade
1. 2. 3. 4.
INDISCIPLINE ABUSE OF POWERS OTHER VIOLATIONS CIVIL Total
Administrative
Prosecutorial
Total
35 57 11 0 103
13 144 11 0 168
48 201 22 0 271
Table 30 Recapitulation of Disciplinary Sanctions imposed on Attorney Service Officials in Indonesia by Substantial Indisciplinary Acts in 2013 No
Grade
Administrative Prosecutorial
Total
1.
Three Year Demotion in accordance with Government Regulation PP 53 of 2010
16
6
22
2.
Demotional Reassignment
0
0
0
3.
Removal from Prosecutorial Duties
0
4
4
4.
Removal from Structural Position
0
3
3
5.
Involuntary Honorable Discharge
7
2
9
6.
Dishonorable Discharge from Civil Service
8
3
11
7.
Temporary Discharge from Civil Service
4
1
5
32
18
50
Total
Note : One report may implicate more than one employee of the Public Prosecution Service, hence the number of legitimate reports do not reflect the number of sanctioned personnel.
In accordance to the principle of reward and punishment as defined by the Government for the improvement of human resources performance, R.I Attorney General Directive No: KEP-099/A/JA/07/2013 dated July, 12th, 2013 on Performance Appraisal for Indonesia Provincial Attorney Office, Assistant of Provincial Attorney Office, and Highest Performing Attorney of 2013 had the following result of:
1. Highest Performing Provincial Attorney Offices and District Attorney Offices Type A and Type B: a. Provincial Attorney Offices: 1. Central Java Provincial Attorney Office 2. East Java Provincial Attorney Office 3. Yogyakarta Office
Provincial
Attorney
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
59
b. District Attorney Offices Type A 1. Sleman District Attorney Office
inside Attorney Service, Supervision division has conducted a series of activities as follow:
2. Pangkal Pinang District Attorney Office
1. Admission of Complaints Reports via Attorney Service Website
3. Purwokerto District Attorney Office
Bureaucratic reform demanded R.I Attorney Service to deliver premium transparent service to the public. The importance of public participation as a social control that requires a positive response has made R.I Attorney Service to open public access by applying information technology (IT) system through establishment of R.I Attorney Service website at the address www. kejaksaan.go.id that has got a channel dedicated for admission of complaints reports. The provision of public access via R.I Attorney Service website was expected to leverage public participation in controlling the attitude of R.I Attorney Service personnel.
The website does not only reported complaints reports related to flawed attitude conducted by R.I Attorney Service personnel to Junior Attorney General Supervision, but also the ones related to technical aspect of case handling, allegation of corruption, as well as those related to Development affairs.
c. District Attorney Offices Type B 1. Sangata District Attorney Office 2. Kayu Agung Office
District
Attorney
3. Pangkep District Attorney Office 2. Highest Performing Attorney: 1. MIA BANULITA, B.A., M.A (Head of Sub Section Legal Concern at Bureau of Law and International Relation) 2. WAGIYO SANTOSO, B.A.,M.A. (Special Force at PPTPK under Junior Attorney General Special Crimes) 3. SUGENG RIYANTA, B.A., M.A. (Head of Section Examination under Assistant of Special Crimes, Central Java Provincial Attorney Office) 3. Highest Performing Personnel:
Adminstrative
1. DENNY S. KURNIAWAN, B.A (Computer Operator at Provincial Attorney Office)
Maluku
2. SUPARMAN, B.Soc, B.A. (Head of Sub Section Human Resources at Assistant of Development Riau Islands Provincial Attorney Office) 3. SUMARDIN, B.A, M.A (Administrative Personnel at Directorate Examination under Junior Attorney General Special Crimes) Other than performing internal supervision duties, to preserve the successful implementation of bureaucratic reform
60
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
2. To follow up on the drafting of Instrument for Unit of Performance Appraisal (IPKU), Junior Attorney General Supervision collaborated with R.I Attorney Service Reform Team and Consultant from Hay Group to refine the IPKU draft that has been reported to the R.I Attorney General; 3. Based on Government Regulation No. 60/2008 on State Interns Supervision System (SPIP), Junior Attorney General Supervision assisted by a team from Finance and Development Supervision Agency (BPKP) has created mapping on implementation of SPIP by conducting
Diagnostic Assessment, interview and data validation for input on report of implementation of SPIP as has been submitted to R.I Attorney General. 4. Finished drafting for R.I Attorney General Regulation No.: PER-015/A/ JA/07/2013 that superseded R.I Attorney General Regulation No.: PER022/A/JA/03/2011 on Implementation of Supervision for R.I Attorney Service. 5. Finished drafting for R.I Attorney General Regulation No.: PER- 026/A/ JA/10/2013 dated October, 3rd, 2013 on Handling and Safeguarding of Informant on R.I Attorney Service Internal Law Infringement; Public Servants’ (LHKPN).
Assets
Declaration
Numbers of Attorney Service personnel obliged to declare their assets were 11.421 persons, with compliance number for LHKPN Form A and Form B reached 2.472, or equal to 21,64% and outstanding LHKPN of 8.949, or equal to 78, 36%.
4.7 EDUCATION AND TRAINING One of the significant program done to improve the quality and capability of R.I Attorney Service human resorces is
Education and Training that has been effectively and efficiently managed. The effective and efficient management has been done since the identification on requirements of education and training, designing of materials, implementation, up to the evaluation on the implementation of the education and training program. As relevant to the attempts of supporting the improvement of professionalism and capabilities of R.I Attorney Service personnel, in 2013 the government has allocated budget for R.I Attorney Service education and training of IDR 130.469.838.000 (One hundred thirty billion four hundred sixty nine million eight hundred thirty eight thousand rupiah), and has included 13 activities as mandated priorities within R.I Attorney Service management and leadership educational program to ensure the success of bureaucratic reform program. Program Performance of R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training was establishment in 2013 which is a part of R.I Attorney Service 2010 – 2014 Strategic Plan (Renstra). The said program was Technical Functional Education and Training Program, Management and Leadership Education and Training Program and Other Technical Management Support Program of
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
61
R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training. Education
and
Training
accomplished in 2013 were: a. Management and Leadeship Education and Training Program
Program
Table 31 Management and Leadership Education and Training Program No.
Type of Course
# of Class
Achievement
1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
2 Leadership II Leadership III Leadership IV Program Performance Planning & Evaluation Governance Procurement ToR / Proposal SOP Substantive ToT Refresher Course Echelon III MOT State Asset Assessment State Asset Management
3 1 2 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
19
100%
Achievement
Remark 5 Programmed numbers and type of courses as for period of January November 2013 has been implemented.
Tabel 32 Leadership Education and Training No.
Type of Course
# of Class
Input / Output
Achievement
1 1. 2.
2 Leadership IV Leadership III
3 6 2
180/180 60/60
4 100% 100%
3. 4.
Leadership II Refresher Course Echelon III
1 1
60/60 30/30
100% 100%
10
330/330
100%
Achievement
Table 33 Technical Management Education and Training No. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
62
Type of Course 2 Program Performance Planning & Evaluation Governance Procurement ToR / Proposal Substantive ToT MOT SOP State Asset Assessment State Asset Management Achievement ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
# of Class
Input / Output
Achievement
3 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 9
30/30 30/30 30/30 30/30 30/30 30/28 30/30 30/30 30/30 270/268
4 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93,3% 100% 100% 100% 98,99%
Table 34 Number of R.I Attorney Service Personnel Participated in 2013 Management and Leadership Education and Training Program No.
Type of Course
1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
2 Leadership II Leadership III Leadership IV Program Performance Planning & Evaluation Governance Procurement ToR / Proposal SOP Substantive ToT Refresher Course Echelon III MOT State Asset Assessment State Asset Management Total
Allocation of Participant 3 60 persons 60 persons 180 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 600 persons
Achievement
%
4 60 persons 60 persons 180 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons 30 persons
5 100% 100% 100% 100 % 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93,3% 100% 100%
598 persons
98,96%
b. Technical Education and Training Program
1. Prosecutorial Education Training (PPPJ);
2. Category of Intelligence Technical Education and Training;
For a more effective Technical Education and Training Program, R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training has done Categorization for Technical Education and Training Program R.I Attorney Service as stipulated in R.I Attorney Service Head of Bureau of Education and Training Directive on Categorization for Technical Education and Training Program R.I Attorney Service which comprised of:
and
3. Category of Special Crimes Technical Education and Training; 4. Category of General Crimes Technical Education and Training; 5. Category of Civil and State Administrative Technical Education and Training; 6. Category of General/Administration and Management Technical Education and Training.
Table 35 2013 Technical and Functional Education and Training Program NO.
TYPE OF EDUCATION/TRAINING
1
2
# of Class Achievement 3
4
Remark 5
I. FUNCTIONAL EDUCATION/TRAINING A. DEVELOPMENT 1.
Resources Management (Human Resources, Finance, and Asset)
1
100%
2.
Human Resources Management
1
100%
3.
State's Owned Asset Management
1
100%
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
63
4.
Finance Planning and Management
1
100%
5.
Public Relation and Protocol
1
100%
6.
Internal Security
1
100 %
7.
Institutional Accounting System (SAI)
1
100%
8.
Public Relation and Protocol
1
100%
B. INTELLIGENCE 9.
Intelligence Agent
2
100 %
10.
Intelligence Officer
2
100%
11.
Basic Intelligence Investigation
2
100%
12.
Intelligence Computer Forensic
2
100%
C. SUPERVISION 13.
Technical Supervision
1
100%
14.
Supervision Management
1
100%
15.
Auditor
1
100%
D. SPECIAL CRIMES 16.
Joint Training Attorney, Judge, Police
2
100 %
17.
Fishery Crimes
2
100 %
18.
Asset Recovery & Extradition
2
100 %
19.
Corruption & Money Laundering Crimes
1
100 %
20.
Special Crimes Cases
1
100 %
21.
Computer Forensic
2
100 %
22.
Trial Advocacy For Attorney
1
100 %
23.
Asset Tracing
1
100 %
E. GENERAL CRIMES 24.
Wildlife Crime
1
100%
25.
Cyber Crime
1
100%
26.
Money Laundering
1
100%
27.
Juvenile Crimes
2
100%
28.
General Crimes
1
100%
29.
Case Management
1
100%
30.
Transnational Crimes
1
100%
31.
Banking Crimes
1
100%
F. CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 32.
Technical Attorney Advance I
1
100 %
33.
Non Litigation (ADR)
1
100 %
34.
Contract Drafting
1
100 %
35.
Civil and State Administrative Advance I
1
100 %
36.
Technical Litigation Advance II
1
100 %
37.
Technical Insolvency
1
100 %
1
100 %
49
100%
II. FUNCTIONAL EDUCATION/TRAINING 38.
Prosecutorial Training Class I - IX ACHIEVEMENT
64
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Table 36 Scholarship - Human Resources Development Program NO.
TYPE OF EDUCATION
# of Class
Achievement
Remark
1
2
3
4
5
I.
MASTER PROGRAM (S-2)
1.
Master Program University of Indonesia
1
100%
2.
Master Program UNHAS
1
100%
3.
Master Program University of Andalas
1
100%
1
100%
4
100%
II. 4
DOCTORATE (S-3) Doctorate Program UNHAS
Achievement
Table 37 Achievement of 2013 Technical and Functional Education and Training Program NO.
TYPE OF EDUCATION/TRAINING
1 2 I. FUNCTIONAL EDUCATION/TRAINING A. DEVELOPMENT 1. Resources Management (Human Resources, Finance, and Asset)
ALLOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS
ACHIEVEMENT
%
3
4
5
40 persons
40 persons
100%
2.
Human Resources Management
40 persons
40 persons
100%
3.
State's Owned Asset Management
40 persons
40 persons
100%
4.
Finance Planning and Management
40 persons
35 persons
100%
5.
Public Relation and Protocol
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
6.
Internal Security
40 persons
40 persons
100%
7.
Institutional Accounting System (SAI)
40 persons
40 persons
100%
8.
Public Relation and Protocol
40 persons
40 persons
100%
B. INTELLIGENCE 9.
Intelligence Agent Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
10.
Intelligence Officer Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
11.
Basic Intelligence Investigation Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
12.
Intelligence Officer Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
13.
Basic Intelligence Investigation Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
14.
Intelligence Agent Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
15.
Intelligence Computer Forensic Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
16.
Intelligence Computer Forensic Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
C. SUPERVISION 17.
Technical Supervision
40 persons
38 persons
95%
18.
Supervision Management
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
19.
Auditor
40 persons
40 persons
100%
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
65
NO.
TYPE OF EDUCATION/TRAINING
1 D. SPECIAL CRIMES
2
ALLOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS 3
ACHIEVEMENT
%
4
5
20.
Joint Training Attorney, Judge, Police Class I
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
21.
Fishery Crimes Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
22.
Asset Recovery & Extradition Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
23.
Joint Training Attorney, Judge, Police Class II
40 persons
38 persons
95%
24.
Fishery Crimes Class II
40 persons
36 persons
90%
25.
Asset Recovery & Extradition Class II
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
26.
Corruption & Money Laundering Crimes
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
27.
Special Crimes Cases
40 persons
40 persons
100%
28.
Computer Forensic Class I
40 persons
37 persons
92,5%
29.
Computer Forensic Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
30.
Trial Advocacy For Attorney
40 persons
40 persons
100%
31.
Asset Tracing
40 persons
40 persons
100%
E. GENERAL CRIMES 32.
Wildlife Crime
40 persons
40 persons
100%
33.
Cyber Crime
40 persons
40 persons
100%
34.
Money Laundering
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
35.
Juvenile Crimes Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
36.
General Crimes
40 persons
40 persons
100%
37.
Case Management
40 persons
40 persons
100%
38.
Juvenile Crimes Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
39.
Environmental Crimes
40 persons
40 persons
100%
40.
Banking Crimes
40 persons
40 persons
100%
41.
Transnational Crimes
40 persons
40 persons
100%
F. CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 42.
Technical Attorney Advance I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
43.
Non Litigation (ADR) Class I
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
44.
Contract Drafting Class I
40 persons
40 persons
100%
45.
Civil and State Administrative Advance I
40 persons
36 persons
90%
46.
Technical Litigation Advance II
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
47.
Non Litigation (ADR) Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
48.
Contract Drafting Class II
40 persons
40 persons
100%
49.
Technical Insolvency
40 persons
39 persons
97,5%
450 persons
450 persons
97%
2410 persons
2379 persons
97,96%
II. FUNCTIONAL EDUCATION/TRAINING 50
Prosecutorial Training Class I - IX ACHIEVEMENT
66
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Tabel 38 Number of R.I Attorney Service Participated in Scholarship – Human Resources Development Program NO.
TYPE OF EDUCATION
ALLOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS
ACHIEVEMENT
%
1
2
3
4
5
34 persons 20 persons 30 persons
34 persons 20 persons 30 persons
100% 100% 100%
84 persons
84 persons
100%
19 persons 19 persons 19 persons
19 persons 19 persons 19 persons 19 persons
103 persons
103 persons
I. MASTER PROGRAM (S-2) 1 2 3
Master Program University of Indonesia Master Program UNHAS Master Program University of Andalas
Total Participants S-2 Program II. DOCTORATE (S-3) 1
Doctorate Program UNHAS - Class I Semester I - Class I Semester II
Total Participants S-3 Program Achievement
100% 100% 100% 100%
c. Capacity Development for Child Friendly Law Enforcers (Diversion and Restorative Justice) Table 39 Capacity Development Program for Child Friendly Law Enforcers (Diversion and Restorative Justice) No. 1.
Type of Education and Training Juvenile Crimes (ABH) Case Handling
Achievement 2013 Total %
Target 2013 80 persons
78 persons
97,50%
d. Functional Education and Training
In 2013 R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training performed Prosecutorial Education and Training (PPPJ) participated by 450 persons that was divided into 9 classes. Table 40 Prosecutorial Education and Training (PPPJ)
No.
Type of Education and Training
Target 2013
1.
Prosecutorial Education and Training (PPPJ)
450 persons
Achievement 2013 Total % 450 persons
100%
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
67
e. Performance of Donor Institution Collaborative Education and Training Program.
NO 1
2013 performance of Donor Institution and R.I Attorney Service Collaborative Education and Training Program were as follow. Table 41 Technical Education/Training Program Implemented by Donor Institution In Collaboration with R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training NAME OF TRAINING / TYPE OF AID Workshop for Judges and Attorneys on Application of Discretion In Decision Making for Corruption Cases
LEVEL Advance
2.
TRIAL ADVOCACY / Technical Workshop for Proper Criminal Court Comparison of Legal Systems In Indonesia and USA
Advance
3.
Diklat Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum bagi Aparat Penegak Hukum ( Penerapan Modul ABH) Development of Curriculum for Education and Training on Integrity Forensic Audit
Advance
4
5.
Focus Group Discussion Curriculum for Forensic Audit
6.
Focus Group Discussion Technical Material for Investigational Interview
68
Technical Workshop Technical Workshop Advance
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
IMPLEMENTER / REMARK ORGANIZER US Departement Conducted 5 times: of Justice/ US-DOJ 1. North Sulawesi Provincial Office of Overseas Attorney Office, April, 18th, Prosecutorial 2013, at Hotel Novetel Development, Manado Assistance and Training 2. East Kalimantan Provincial (OPDAT) Attorney Office, April, 22nd, 2013 at Hotel Aston Balikpapan 3. North Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office, August, 22nd, 2013 at Hotel JW Marriot Medan, Jl. Putri Hijau No. 10 Medan 4. Aceh Provincial Attorney Office, August, 26th, 2013 at Hotel Hermes Palace Jl. T.Panglima Nyak Makan Banda Aceh NAD 5. West Sumatera Provincial Attorney Office, August, 28th, 2013 at Hotel Grand Rocky Bukittinggi West Sumatera, Jl. Yos Sudarso No. 29 Benteng Bukittinggi. US Department of June, 24th-28th, 2013 08.30-10.00 Justice/US-DOJ Office of WITA, at Hotel The Jayakarta, Overseas Prosecutorial Lombok Jalan Senggigi KM 4 Development Assistance Lombok Barat. and Training (OPDAT) UNICEF, Ministry of Law September 2nd-14th, 2013 at and Human Rights R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training The Asia Faundation - September 2nd-14th, 2013 at USAID R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training The Asia Faundation USAID
September, 15th, 2013 at Hotel Kemang, Jakarta
AIPJ- USAID
Oktober, 7th, 2013, at Hotel
Graphic 9 Education and Training Bureau Performance in 2013 Target
Achievement 2410
600
2379
598
Manajement & Leadership
Technical & Functional
Construction/Procurement of Facilities and Infrastructure for Bureau of Education and Training in 2013 : Table 42 Construction/Procurement of Facilities and Infrastructure for Bureau of Education and Training No.
Type of Construction / Procurement
Target
Achievement
1.
Procurement for Interior
100%
100%
2.
Construction of Archive Building
100%
100%
3.
Construction of Warehouse Building
100%
100%
4.
Procurement for 4 wheeled vehicle (Bus)
100%
100%
5.
Procurement for Ambulance and Equipment
100%
100%
6.
Procurement for fully equipped Computer Units
100%
100%
100%
100%
Achievement
Remark
Graphic 10 Education and Training Bureau Performance Achievement in 2013 Target 100%
Achievement 100%
Construction of Infrastructure
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
69
BUREAU OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING ACHIEVEMENT IN 2013: In 2013 R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training has obtained accreditation from National Institution of Administration (LAN) for following types of programs a. Education and Training Management and Leadership:
on
- Leadership III Education and Training (Accreditation A) - Leadership IV Education and Training (Accreditation A) - Grade III Preparatory Program (Accreditation A) - Grade II Preparatory Program (Accreditation A) b. Technical Functional Education and
70
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
Training: - Technical Development Education and Training (Accreditation B) - Technical Intelligence Education and Training (Accreditation B) - Technical General Crimes Education and Training (Accreditation B) - Technical Special Crimes Education and Training (Accreditation B) - Technical Civil and State Administrative Education and Training (Accreditation B) - Prosecutorial Education and Training Program (Accreditation A) Expiration of 2013 Certificate ISO 9001 for R.I Attorney Service Bureau of Education and Training has been followed by an audit for year 2014 that awarded ISO Quality Management 9001-2008 to the bureau.
CHAPTER V
OTHER ACTIVITIES
CHAPTER V
OTHER ACTIVITIES
T
o implement Bureaucrati Reform towards Good Governance 2025 Attorney Service performance in 2013, E-Procurement (LPSE) LPSE has become a part of Bureaucratic Reform done in the line of management of procurement for goods and service. R.I Attorney Service LPSE performed electronical procurement for goods and service required by the institution that was developed to modify performance of procurement duties into a better, effective and efficient service system. E-Procurement or internet based online procurement of goods and service is an attempt to ensure transparent bureaucracy, minimalize misappropriation and shortening the long bureaucratic line that has been operated in R.I Attorney Service since 2011 through MoU between R.I Attorney Service 72
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
and Ministry of Finance LPSE. Procurement Service Unit (ULP) in R.I Attorney Service was established to create a professional procurement process that is free from intervention, corruption, collusion and nepotism, with the objective of developing a system that is able to minimize possibility of error of misappropriation in procuring goods and service, and to procure economical quality goods and services through effective and efficient means, and fair and transparent competition. Procurement activity for R.I Attorney Service in 2013 has temporarily undergone the LPSE system under Ministry of Finance. Currently R.I Attorney Service has been preparing the development of LPSE Mandiri and would implement its own ULP in 2014.
During preparation for LPSE Mandiri R.I Attorney General Office has delivered LPSE Application Management training at Bali Provincial Attorney Office on November, 13th – 15th, 2013, participated by 32 (thirty two) personnel from a number of Provincial Attorney Offices of Bali Provincial Attorney Office and District Attorney Office under the jusrisdiction of Bali province, West Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office, East Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office, South Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office, Central Kalimantan Provincial Attorney Office, Nusa Tenggara Timur Provincial Attorney Office, Nusa Tenggara NO 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28.
Barat Provincial Attorney Office and East Java Provincial Attorney Office. Dissemination of information over Presidential Regulation No. 70/2012 on Second Amendment on Presidential Regulation No. 54/2010 on Procurement of Goods and Service and National Certification Test for Procurement of Goods and Service at R.I Attorney General Office, Provincial Attorney Offices in Indonesia has been done in 2013, participated by 1.707 (One Thousand Seven Hundred Seven) personnel with graduates of 341 (Three Hundred Forty One) personnel as in the description below :
WORKING UNIT/ VENUE 2 R.I Attorney General Office & DKI Jakarta Provicial Attorney Office Aceh Provicial Attorney Office North Sumatera Provicial Attorney Office West Sumatera Provicial Attorney Office Riau Provicial Attorney Office Jambi Provicial Attorney Office South Sumatera Provicial Attorney Office Bengkulu Provicial Attorney Office Lampung Provicial Attorney Office West Java Provicial Attorney Office Central Java Provicial Attorney Office DI. Yogyakarta Provicial Attorney Office East Java Provicial Attorney Office West Kalimantan Provicial Attorney Office Central Kalimantan Provicial Attorney Office East Kalimantan Provicial Attorney Office North Sulawesi Provicial Attorney Office Central Sulawesi Provicial Attorney Office South Sulawesi Provicial Attorney Office Bali Provicial Attorney Office West Nusa Tenggara Provicial Attorney Office Maluku Provicial Attorney Office Papua Provicial Attorney Office North Maluku Provicial Attorney Office Banten Provicial Attorney Office Bangka Belitung Islands Provicial Attorney Office Gorontalo Provicial Attorney Office Riau Islands Provicial Attorney Office TOTAL
NO. of PARTICIPANTS 3 140 71 87 119 58 56 47 42 50 34 84 56 82 40 59 53 39 36 60 49 29 78 44 44 49 54 51 96 1707
GRADUATEE 4 38 3 14 42 1 25 5 11 6 6 7 2 23 8 1 5 4 0 18 16 14 8 9 5 3 3 7 82 366
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
73
74
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
CHAPTER VI
CONCLUSIONS
CHAPTER VI
CONCLUSIONS
T
he people of Indonesia in this time has gained better awareness of their constituency rights and obligations. The dynamic population demanded the aspects of convenience and promptness in administrative service. In accordance to the meet the public demands on information, R.I Attorney Service convey the 2013 Annual Report as the manifestation of R.I Attorney General 2013 Performance in delivering the best service to the justice enquiring public. R.I Attorney Service realized that despite many reforms for improvement of the institution, the public still required a series of overall changes in particular regards to
76
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
those related aspects of management, human resources in R.I Attorney Service and the organizations as well as quality improvement and acceleration of R.I Attorney Service performance in the service of legal assurance and sense of justice to the public, which would directly benefit the public in terms of correlation between legal assurance with improvement of people’s social well-being. Upon consideration over the response from the community, it was deemed necessary to do another series of arrangement actions within R.I Attorney Service in the future that will straighten R.I Attorney Service internal supervision system to enable preventive aspect and ensure objectivity
in the system of reward and punishment for Attorney Service personnel, organize personnel integrity aspect, improve human resources developmental effort by means of merit system, manage performance based budgeting system and maximize budget disbursement by complying to determined outputs, upgrade of means for and/or progress the operation of information technology for performing the duties of R.I Attorney Service, and last but not least, improve the well-being of adhyaksa personnel. In the attempt of doing a simultaneous and sustainable reform into a structure
within an institution, legal customs and the substance of performance, every phase of improvement needs to be done accordingly to the plan that must be measurable in a clear design as proper to the public expectation. To conclude this report, improved performance and maintained personnel integrity of R.I Attorney Service were expected to bring greater public trust for the institution and to enable R.I Attorney Service in keeping with the progress and changes of times to attain an Affluent, Just and Democratic Indonesia.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
77
APPENDIX
LIST OF PROVINCIAL ATTORNEY OFFICES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICES, AND BRANCH ATTORNEY OFFICES IN INDONESIA NO PROVINCIAL ATTORNEY OFFICES 1 1.
2.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICES
TYPE
BRANCH ATTORNEY OFFICES
3
4
5
2 ACEH
1.
BANDA ACEH
A
DI BANDA ACEH
2.
SABANG
B
3.
SIGLI
B
4.
LHOKSEUMAWE
B
5.
LANGSA
B
6.
TAKENGON
B
7.
MEULABOH
B
8.
TAPAKTUAN
B
9.
KUTACANE
B
1.
SIGLI DI KOTA BAKTI
2.
TAPAKTUAN DI BAKONGAN
1.
LUBUK PAKAM DI PANCUR BATU
2.
LUBUK PAKAM DI LABUHAN DELI
10. BIREUEN
B
11. LHOKSUKON
B
12. I D I
B
13. KUALA SIMPANG
B
14. SINABANG
B
15. CALANG
B
16. SINGKEL
B
17. BLANGKEJEREN
B
18. JANTHOI
B
19. BLANGPIDIE
B
20. SUKAMAKMUE
B
21. SIMPANG TIGA REDELONG
B
22. MEUREUDU
B
SUMATERA UTARA
1.
MEDAN
A
DI MEDAN
2.
BINJAI
A
3.
PEMATANG SIANTAR
A
4.
SIBOLGA
A
5.
LUBUK PAKAM
A
6.
TEBING TINGGI
B
7.
TANJUNG BALAI
B
8.
RANTAU PRAPAT
B
3.
RANTAU PRAPAT DI KOTA PINANG
9.
KABANJAHE
B
4.
KABANJAHE DI TIGA BINANGA
10. SIDIKALANG
B
11. TARUTUNG
B
5.
TARUTUNG DI SIBORONG-BORONG
12. PADANG SIDEMPUAN
B
6.
PADANG SIDEMPUAN DI SIPIROK
7.
PADANG SIDEMPUAN DI SUBUHUAN
8.
PADANG SIDEMPUAN DI GUNUNG TUA
80
13. GUNUNGSITOLI
B
14. KISARAN
B
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
1
2
3
4
15. SIANTAR
B
16. STABAT
B
17. BELAWAN
B
18. BALIGE
B
5 9.
STABAT DI PANGKALAN BRANDAN
10. BALIGE DI PORSEA 11. BALIGE DI PANGURURAN
19. PANYABUNGAN
B
12. PANYABUNGAN DI KOTANOPAN 13. PANYABUNGAN DI NATAL
3.
4.
5.
20. SEI RAMPAH
B
21. TELUK DALAM
B
22. DOLOK SANGGUL
B
23. LIMA PULUH
B
SUMATERA BARAT
1.
PADANG
A
DI PADANG
2.
BUKITTINGGI
A
3.
PAYAKUMBUH
B
4.
PARIAMAN
B
5.
SAWAHLUNTO
B
6.
SOLOK
B
7.
PADANG PANJANG
B
8.
BATUSANGKAR
B
9.
LUBUK SIKAPING
B
10. PAINAN
B
11. SIJUNJUNG
B
12. LUBUK BASUNG
B
13. TUA PEJAT
B
14. SIMPANG EMPAT
B
15. PULAU PUNJUNG
B
16. PADANG ARO
B
RIAU
1.
PEKANBARU
A
DI PEKANBARU
2.
RENGAT
B
3.
DUMAI
B
4.
BENGKALIS
B
5.
TEMBILAHAN
B
6.
BANGKINANG
B
7.
PASIR PANGARAIAN
B
8.
SIAK SRI INDRAPURA
B
9.
TELUK KUANTAN
B
10.
PANGKALAN KERINCI
B
11.
BAGANSIAPIAPI
B
JAMBI
1.
JAMBI
A
DI JAMBI
2.
MUARA BULIAN
B
3.
MUARA BUNGO
B
14. TELUK DALAM DI PULAU TELO
1.
PAYAKUMBUH DI PKL KOTA BARU
2.
PAYAKUMBUH DI SULIKI
3.
SOLOK DI ALAHAN PANJANG
4.
PAINAN DI BALAI SELASA
5.
LUBUK BASUNG DI MANINJAU
6.
SIMPANG EMPAT DI TALU
1.
BENGKALIS DI SELAT PANJANG
1.
MUARA BULIAN DI MUARA TEMBESI
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
81
1
6.
7.
8.
2
3
4
4.
SUNGAI PENUH
B
5.
BANGKO
B
6.
KUALA TUNGKAL
B
7.
SAROLANGUN
B
8.
MUARA TEBO
B
9.
MUARA SABAK
B
10.
SENGETI
B
SUMATERA SELATAN
1.
PALEMBANG
A
DI PALEMBANG
2.
KAYU AGUNG
B
3.
BATURAJA
B
4.
LAHAT
B
5.
LUBUK LINGGAU
B
6.
MUARA ENIM
B
7.
SEKAYU
B
8.
PRABUMULIH
B
9.
PAGAR ALAM
B
10.
PANGKALAN BALAI
B
11.
TEBING TINGGI
B
BENGKULU
1.
BENGKULU
A
DI BENGKULU
2.
CURUP
B
3.
ARGAMAKMUR
B
4.
MANNA
B
5.
MUKOMUKO
B
6.
TAI S
B
7.
BINTUHAN
B
8.
TUBEI
B
9.
KEPAHIANG
B
1.
BANDAR LAMPUNG
A
LAMPUNG
5
2.
MUARA SABAK DI NIPAH PAJANG
1.
BATURAJA DI MARTAPURA
2.
BATURAJA DI MUARA DUA
3.
MUARA ENIM DI PENDOPO
1.
DI BANDAR LAMPUNG
9.
82
BANDAR LAMPUNG DI PELABUHAN PANJANG
2.
KALIANDA
B
3.
METRO
B
4.
KOTABUMI
B
5.
LIWA
B
6.
GUNUNG SUGIH
B
7.
SUKADANA
B
8.
BLAMBANGAN UMPU
B
9.
MENGGALA
B
10.
KOTA AGUNG
B
DKI JAKARTA
1.
JAKARTA PUSAT
A
DI JAKARTA
2.
JAKARTA UTARA
A
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
2.
LIWA DI KRUI
3.
KOTA AGUNG DI PRINGSEWU
4.
KOTA AGUNG DI TALANG PADANG
1
10.
11.
2
3
4
3.
JAKARTA BARAT
A
4.
JAKARTA TIMUR
A
5.
JAKARTA SELATAN
A
JAWA BARAT
1.
BANDUNG
A
DI BANDUNG
2.
CIREBON
A
3.
BOGOR
A
4.
SUKABUMI
A
5.
PURWAKARTA
A
6.
GARUT
A
7.
TASIKMALAYA
A
8.
BEKASI
A
JAWA TENGAH
9.
CIBINONG
A
10.
CIMAHI/BALE BANDUNG
A
11.
DEPOK
A
12.
INDRAMAYU
B
13.
SUMEDANG
B
14.
KUNINGAN
B
15.
MAJALENGKA
B
16.
CIAMIS
B
17.
KARAWANG
B
18.
CIANJUR
B
19.
SUBANG
B
20.
SUMBER
B
21.
CIBADAK
B
22.
CIKARANG
B
23.
BANJAR
B
24.
SINGAPARNA
B
25.
CIMAHI
B
1.
SEMARANG
A
2.
SURAKARTA
A
3.
PEKALONGAN
A
4.
MAGELANG
A
5.
PURWOKERTO
A
6.
TEGAL
A
7.
PATI
A
8.
CILACAP
A
9.
KUDUS
B
10.
KLATEN
B
11.
SALATIGA
B
12.
REMBANG
B
13.
PEMALANG
B
14.
PURBALINGGA
B
15.
PURWOREJO
B
DI SEMARANG
5
1.
SEMARANG DI PELABUHAN SEMARANG
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
83
1
12.
13.
84
2
3
4
16.
KEBUMEN
B
17.
SRAGEN
B
18.
KENDAL
B
19.
BLORA
B
20.
BOYOLALI
B
21.
BREBES
B
22.
DEMAK
B
23.
JEPARA
B
24.
KARANGANYAR
B
25.
SUKOHARJO
B
26.
WONOGIRI
B
27.
BANJAR NEGARA
B
28.
TEMANGGUNG
B
29.
WONOSOBO
B
30.
BANYUMAS
B
31.
BATANG
B
32.
PURWODADI
B
33.
AMBARAWA
B
34.
SLAWI
B
35.
MUNGKID
B
36.
KAJEN
B
DAERAH ISTIMEWA
1.
YOGYAKARTA
A
YOGYAKARTA
2.
SLEMAN
A
DI YOGYAKARTA
3.
WONOSARI
B
4.
WATES
B
5.
BANTUL
B
JAWA TIMUR
1.
SURABAYA
A
DI SURABAYA
2.
MALANG
A
3.
JEMBER
A
4.
KEDIRI
A
5.
MADIUN
A
6.
PASURUAN
A
7.
BOJONEGORO
A
8.
BONDOWOSO
A
9.
PAMEKASAN
A
10.
SIDOARJO
A
11.
KEPANJEN
A
12.
BANYUWANGI
A
13.
B LITAR
A
14.
MOJOKERTO
B
15.
PROBOLINGGO
B
16.
JOMBANG
B
17.
PONOROGO
B
18.
GRESIK
B
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
5
1
14.
15.
2
3
4
19.
LUMAJANG
B
20.
TULUNG AGUNG
B
21.
TRENGGALEK
B
22.
NGANJUK
B
23.
MAGETAN
B
24.
TUBAN
B
25.
NGAWI
B
26.
SUMENEP
B
27.
LAMONGAN
B
28.
SAMPANG
B
29.
BANGKALAN
B
30.
PACITAN
B
31.
SITUBONDO
B
32.
BANGIL
B
33.
KRAKSAAN
B
34.
TANJUNG PERAK
B
35.
BATU
B
36.
NGASEM
B
37.
MEJAYAN
B
KALIMANTAN BARAT
1.
PONTIANAK
A
DI PONTIANAK
2.
SINGKAWANG
A
3.
SINTANG
B
4.
KETAPANG
B
5.
SANGGAU
B
6.
MEMPAWAH
B
7.
PUTUSIBAU
B
8.
SAMBAS
B
9.
BENGKAYANG
B
10.
NGABANG
B
11.
SEKADAU
B
KALIMANTAN TENGAH
1.
PALANGKARAYA
A
DI PALANGKARAYA
2.
SAMPIT
B
3.
KUALA KAPUAS
B
4.
MUARA TEWEH
B
5.
PANGKALANBUN
B
6.
BUNTOK
B
7.
PURUK CAHU
B
8.
TAMIANG LAYANG
B
9.
KASONGAN
B
10.
KUALA PEMBUANG
B
11.
SUKAMARA
B
12.
NANGA BULIK
B
13.
KUALA KURUN
B
14.
PULANG PISAU
B
5
1.
SANGGAU DI ENTIKONG
2.
SAMBAS DI PEMANGKAT
1.
KUALA KAPUAS DI PALINGKAU
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
85
1 16.
17.
18.
19.
2
3
KALIMANTAN SELATAN
1.
BANJARMASIN
A
DI BANJARMASIN
2.
KANDANGAN
B
3.
KOTABARU
B
4.
MARTAPURA
B
5.
AMUNTAI
B
6.
BARABAI
B
7.
TANJUNG
B
8.
RANTAU
B
9.
PLEIHARI
B
10.
MARABAHAN
B
11.
BANJARBARU
B
12.
BATULICIN
B
13.
PARINGIN
B
KALIMANTAN TIMUR
1.
BALIKPAPAN
A
DI SAMARINDA
2.
SAMARINDA
A
3.
TENGGARONG
A
4.
TANAH GROGOT
B
5.
TANJUNG REDEP
B
6.
TARAKAN
B
7.
NUNUKAN
B
8.
BONTANG
B
5
9.
TANJUNG SELOR
B
10.
SENDAWAR
B
11.
SANGATTA
B
12.
MALINAU
B
13.
PENAJAM
B
SULAWESI UTARA
1.
MANADO
A
DI MANADO
2.
TONDANO
B
3.
KOTAMOBAGU
B
1.
KOTAMOBAGU DI DOMUGA
4.
TAHUNA
B
2.
TAHUNA DI SIAU
5.
BITUNG
B
6.
TOMOHON
B
7.
AMURANG
B
8.
MELONGUANE
B
3.
MELONGUANE DI BEO
9.
AIRMADIDI
B
10.
BOROKO
B
SULAWESI TENGAH
1.
PALU
A
DI PALU
2.
LUWUK
B
1.
LUWUK DI BUNTA
2.
LUWUK DI PAGIMANA
3.
TOLI-TOLI DI LAULALANG
4.
TOLI-TOLI DI OGOTUA
3.
86
4
TOLI-TOLI
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
B
1
2
3 4.
POSO
4 B
5.
DONGGALA
B
6.
BANGGAI
B
7.
PARIGI
B
5 5.
TOLI-TOLI DI BANGKIR
6.
POSO DI KOLONADALE
7.
POSO DI TENTENA
8.
POSO DI BUNGKU
9.
DONGGALA DI SABANG
10. DONGGALA DI TOMPE 11. PARIGI DI TINOMBO 12. PARIGI DI MOUTONG 8.
BUOL
B
13. BUOL DI PALELEH 14. BUOL DI LOKODIDI
20.
21.
9.
AMPANA
B
SULAWESI TENGGARA
1.
KENDARI
A
DI KENDARI
2.
BAU-BAU
B
3.
KOLAKA
B
4.
RAHA
B
5.
UNAAHA
B
6.
WANGI-WANGI
B
7.
LASUSUA
B
8.
ANDOOLO
B
9.
PASARWAJO
B
1.
MAKASSAR
A
SULAWESI SELATAN
15. AMPANA DI UNA-UNA/WAKAI
1.
DI MAKASSAR
MAKASSAR DI PELABUHAN MAKASSAR
2.
PARE-PARE
A
3.
PALOPO
A
4.
SUNGGUMINASA
A
2.
SUNGGUMINASA DI MALINO
5.
WATAMPONE/BONE
A
3.
BONE DI POMPANUA
4.
BONE DI LAPARIAJA
5.
BONE DIKAJUARA
6.
MAROS DI CAMBA
7.
BALUKUMBA DI KAJANG
8.
MAKALE DI RANTEPAO
6.
MAMUJU
B
7.
MAROS
B
8.
BANTAENG
B
9.
PINRANG
B
10.
SENGKANG
B
11.
SOPPENG
B
12.
BARRU
B
13.
BULUKUMBA
B
14.
JENEPONTO
B
15.
ENREKANG
B
16.
MAJENE
B
17.
MAKALE
B
18.
PANGKAJENE
B
19.
SELAYAR
B
20.
POLEWALI
B
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
87
1
22.
23.
2
3
4
21.
SIDENRENGRAPPANG
B
22.
SINJAI
B
23.
TAKALAR
B
24.
MASAMBA
B
25.
MAMASA
B
26.
BELOPA
B
27.
MALILI
B
28.
PASANGKAYU
B
BALI
1.
DENPASAR
A
DI DENPASAR
2.
SINGARAJA
A
3.
KLUNGKUNG
B
4.
BANGLI
B
5.
AMLAPURA
B
6.
GIANYAR
B
7.
NEGARA
B
8.
TABANAN
B
NUSA TENGGARA BARAT
1.
MATARAM
A
DI MATARAM
2.
PRAYA
B
3.
SELONG
B
4.
SUMBAWA BESAR
B
5.
RABA
B
6.
DOMPU
B
NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR
1.
KUPANG
A
DI KUPANG
2.
SOE
B
3.
KEFAMENANU
B
4.
ATAMBUA
B
5.
ENDE
B
6.
MAUMERE
B
7.
LARANTUKA
8. 9. 10.
WAINGAPU
5
9.
MALILI DI WOTU
1.
KLUNGKUNG DI NUSA PENIDA
1.
KUPANG DI SEBA (SEBU)
B
2.
LARANTUKA DI WAIWERANG
RUTENG
B
3.
RUTENG DI REO
BAJAWA
B
1.
AMBON DI BANDANAERA
2.
AMBON DI SAPARUA
24.
25.
MALUKU
11.
WAIKABUBAK
B
12.
KALABAHI
B
13.
LEWOLEBA
B
14.
BAA
B
15.
LABUAN BAJO
B
16.
OELAMASI
B
1.
AMBON
A
DI AMBON
88
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
1
2
3 2.
26.
27.
MASOHI
4 B
3.
TUAL
B
4.
SAUMLAKI
B
5.
NAMLEA
B
6.
DOBO
B
PAPUA
1.
JAYAPURA
A
DI JAYAPURA
2.
BIAK
B
3.
MANOKWARI
B
4.
SORONG
B
5.
FAK-FAK
B
6.
MERAUKE
B
7.
WAMENA
B
8.
NABIRE
B
9.
SERUI
B
10.
TIMIKA
B
1.
TERNATE
B
2.
SOASIU
B
3.
TOBELO
B
4.
LABUHA
B
5.
SANANA
B
6.
WEDA
B
BANTEN
1.
SERANG
A
DI SERANG
2.
TANGERANG
A
3.
TIGARAKSA
A
4.
PANDEGLANG
B
5.
RANGKASBITUNG
B
6.
CILEGON
B
KEPULAUAN BANGKA
1.
PANGKAL PINANG
A
BELITUNG
2.
SUNGAILIAT
B
DI PANGKAL PINANG
3.
TANJUNG PANDAN
B
4.
MENTOK
B
5.
MANGGAR
B
6.
TOBOALI
B
7.
KOBA
B
GORONTALO
1.
LIMBOTO
B
DI KOTA GORONTALO
2.
GORONTALO
B
MALUKU UTARA DI SOFIFI
28.
29.
30.
5 3.
MASOHI DI GESER
4.
MASOHI DI PIRU
5.
MASOHI DI WAHAI
6.
TUAL DI WONRELI
1.
TERNATE DI MOROTAI
2.
TERNATE DI JAILOLO
1.
1.
SUNGAILIAT DI BELINYU
LIMBOTO DI KWANDANG.
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
89
1
31.
2
3
4
3.
TILAMUTA
B
4.
SUWAWA
B
5.
MARISA
B
KEPULAUAN RIAU
1.
TANJUNG PINANG
A
DI TANJUNG PINANG
2.
BATAM
A
3.
TANJUNG BALAI KARIMUN
B
5
1.
TANJUNG BALAI KARIMUN DI TANJUNG BATU
90
4.
RANAI
B
5.
DAIK LINGGA
B
ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY RI 2013
2.
TANJUNG BALAI KARIMUN DI MORO
3.
RANAI DI TAREMPA
COVER BELAKANG
ATTORNEY REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Jl. Sultan Hasanuddin No. 1, Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta Selatan Phone. (021) 720 3062, 720 3061, 722 1568, 722 1388, 722 1390, 722 1391, 722 1392, 739 2210, 739 2245, 739 2351 Website:http://www.kejaksaan.go.id
